Charlie Crème still has them as a 7 seed! 😐There it is. Tennessee's losing streak runs to 6 to end the regular season, and they have lost 10 of 12. They should be about an 11 seed, but I know that's not what's gonna happen. In the play-in game too.
Charlie Crème still has them as a 7 seed! 😐There it is. Tennessee's losing streak runs to 6 to end the regular season, and they have lost 10 of 12. They should be about an 11 seed, but I know that's not what's gonna happen. In the play-in game too.
Likely based on their NET. I don't think that any of these bracketologists know how to use all the metrics, so they rely heavily on the only one they somewhat understand.Charlie Crème still has them as a 7 seed! 😐
Her colleague said Blakes and the Pauldo twins were from "the New Jersey area." They are, in fact, from New Jersey.I’m watching the Vandy/Lady Vols matchup and heard Carolyn Peck say Madison Booker plays for Tennessee. Her colleague didn’t correct her either.
![]()
She made a pass in today's game that just had my head spinning!I think an overlooked footnote in Blake’s game is her passing. Galvan is the floor general but I’ll take 4.6 assists/game from true PGs at most programs in the country.
There it is. Tennessee's losing streak runs to 6 to end the regular season, and they have lost 10 of 12. They should be about an 11 seed, but I know that's not what's gonna happen. In the play-in game too.
WowI'm sure Stanford has dropped off everyone's radar here, but it was fun being there to see them blow out Clemson 85-50 on Senior Day. Leaves me with hope for next year. Maybe the good vibes will keep players out of the portal.
There are about 35 teams that I would put their names in a hat and start drawing. The bubble is SO WEAK this year.where would you seed USC?
I posted this in the Tenn thread - Charlie Creme just saying something like, Tenn still deserves a #7 seed for keeping it close or playing competitive or something random vs Vandy. Me? I'm thinking, that's a six game losing streak at the end of the season, when IMHO, the committee should be looking at what teams are finishing strong. Still not buying the SEC is SO strong, etc, etc, when I'm looking at a 8-8 and 16-12 record, the latter wins of which were vs East Tennessee State, UT Martin, Belmont, Middle Tennessee, Coppin State, Winthrop, and Southern Indiana. And no, I am not disparaging those programs.Charlie Crème still has them as a 7 seed! 😐
how? The bubble is too big .Speaking of Mississippi St., they led early but are down 13 to LSU at the half. If they lose, they will drop to 5-11 in the SEC. How are they on the bubble? How?
When they try to push for expansion again; I hope a lot of people will remember how soft the bubble was and speak up.how? The bubble is too big .
how? The bubble is too big .
The perception of a strong conference beating each other up being better than teams out there playing solid hoop is too hard to overcome, Even for those that cannot get the premier teams to schedule them. And a confession - when teams with suspect records make it in, I usually pick the upset and will root for the underdogs, just because.Speaking of Mississippi St., they led early but are down 13 to LSU at the half. If they lose, they will drop to 5-11 in the SEC. How are they on the bubble? How?
I realize the bubble is big and soft, but losing 2/3 of your conference games should be an automatic disqualifier, regardless of conference, regardless of strength of schedule, NET, Quad 1 and 2 wins, anything. You lose that many conference games, you don't deserve it.how? The bubble is too big .
Not that anyone is even slightly interested, but Purdue and UCF notched wins in these hotly contested games.We've got a pair of "somebody has to win" specials going on right now--Purdue @ Northwestern and UCF @ Houston.