Methinks you folks attach way too much importance to having NYC, Philly, and other eastern seaboard towns in your neighborhood. Their large populations, none of which is particularly invested in college athletics, mean little in terms of program success. Case in point: with the exception of Houston and maybe Duke (if you take into account Durham's proximity to Raleigh), none of the teams in the Elite Eight is located in a high population center. Clearly, other factors define success.I'm not trying to crap on the league. Good God, everyone is having trouble reading lately.
My point was, and still is, that we NEED the Big East to step up their b-ball investment. I've already stated that we are the best non P4 league out there, and I've stated it multiple times.
Nova finally decided to go big and replace Neptune. Great. That's what we need. Schools like Seton Hall and DePaul and Providence are going to need to step up too. You should know more than most on this board that I was "all in" on Independent football and Big East Olympics. And it saved both.
This is an arms race. The entire Elite Eight were P4 schools. If half of our schools in the conference don't invest heavily (despite being in some of the highest population cities in the country), then we are our own worst enemy...
As regards football, consider a place like Tuscaloosa or even the whole state of Alabama. If there were a strong correlation between population and money, then how would you explain the University of Alabama's success monetarily and on the gridiron?