We Lead The Conference In Fouling | Page 2 | The Boneyard

We Lead The Conference In Fouling

UConn plays aggressive defense and isn't particularly quick at the 1, 2, or 4 as others have noted. Johnson does foul a lot. And our coach has said more than a few questionable things to the refs over the years. That can't help the situation.

That said, Karaban does seem to get hit with lots of fouls on virtually nothing.
 


This doesn’t seem right imo.


The only team even close is St John's. And they play defense more aggressively trying to create turnovers. You supposed to foul more when you're reaching in all game long.

Conversely Alex is being called for fouls when he's literally standing there with his hands above his head (read hands not coming down or reaching in)
 
We do foul but it seems like Karaban gets the poopy end of the stick on a lot of his fouls.
I agree. Although it is tough to see on TV, but it seems Karaban (and others) stand straight up with arms high. Not making any contact. Iknow there is also the body, but even our bigs do the same. Maybe I need to look closer.
 
We are slow at the 1, 2 and 4 with a foul-happy 5. I'm not terribly surprised.

BE refs also suck.
I'd be curious what last year's numbers show, when we were elite defensively both as individuals and as a team.
 
This is a complete repeat of last year where we apparently “fouled a lot” in the Big East but seemed to play perfectly clean in March and in non-conference. The league needs to get this under control ASAP. Tell me which other conference black balls their best team like the Big East does to UConn? Maybe the BE officials are still pissed at Hurley for calling them out in his press conference after we won the national championship.
 
There is a very strange game vs. Manhattan when both teams were only called for 6 fouls this season. If you throw that out as an outlier ...

UConn vs. Big East teams this season: 19.3 fouls per game
UConn vs. non-Big East teams this season: 17.2 fouls per game

UConn vs. Big East teams last reg. season: 18.0 fouls per game
UConn vs. non-Big East teams last reg. season: 18.6 fouls per game

And the other side of that. Fouls called on our opponents:

Big East teams vs. UConn this season: 17.8 fouls per game
Non-Big East teams vs. UConn this season: 18.9 fouls per game

Big East teams vs. UConn last reg. season: 18.0 fouls per game
Non-Big East teams vs. UConn last reg. season: 16.3 fouls per game
So, this year:

In BE play: We are called for 1.5 more fouls per game than our opponents.
In OOC play: We are called for 1.7 fewer fouls per game than our opponents.
Net differential: 3.2 fouls less favorable in BE play

Last year:

In BE play: we were called for the same number of fouls as our opponents.
In OOC play: we were called for 2.3 more fouls per game than our opponents.
Net differential: 2.3 fouls more favorable in BE play

I'm surprised by last year's numbers, where it felt like we routinely got a horrible whistle in conference but I don't remember much consternation in the OOC.

But this year we are absolutely getting a much worse whistle in conference than OOC.
 
.-.
So, this year:

In BE play: We are called for 1.5 more fouls per game than our opponents.
In OOC play: We are called for 1.7 fewer fouls per game than our opponents.
Net differential: 3.2 fouls less favorable in BE play

Last year:

In BE play: we were called for the same number of fouls as our opponents.
In OOC play: we were called for 2.3 more fouls per game than our opponents.
Net differential: 2.3 fouls more favorable in BE play

I'm surprised by last year's numbers, where it felt like we routinely got a horrible whistle in conference but I don't remember much consternation in the OOC.

But this year we are absolutely getting a much worse whistle in conference than OOC.
This is really interesting.

However i think our biggest gripe as a team (and fanbase) is UNCALLED fouls against us which is far more difficult to quantify.
Until someone decides to watch all our games in slow motion and count the fouls against us that weren't called, we won't know how bad this is.
 
I wonder what’s the correlation between good defensive teams and fouling. I ask because Pitino usually has that rep and they’re high up there too.
Always felt Pitino teams were deliberately testing what the refs would allow on a game to game basis
 
So, this year:

In BE play: We are called for 1.5 more fouls per game than our opponents.
In OOC play: We are called for 1.7 fewer fouls per game than our opponents.
Net differential: 3.2 fouls less favorable in BE play

Last year:

In BE play: we were called for the same number of fouls as our opponents.
In OOC play: we were called for 2.3 more fouls per game than our opponents.
Net differential: 2.3 fouls more favorable in BE play

I'm surprised by last year's numbers, where it felt like we routinely got a horrible whistle in conference but I don't remember much consternation in the OOC.

But this year we are absolutely getting a much worse whistle in conference than OOC.
Most likely because the BE teams we’ve played against this year run iso plays more often than the OOC teams.
 


This doesn’t seem right imo.

The gap between us and #3 is bigger than the gap between #3 and last. Yeah that doesn’t seem right to me either. But we’ve always had our opinions of reffing; this simply confirms what we knew with the actual numbers.
 
.-.
I think part of this is also how deep the team is, so there is less worry. Lot of closer games typically means more D and probably more fouls.
Remember also that with Donovan out, Alex is covering bigger players when he plays small ball center.
 
Marquette is the mystery to me. They start harassing the ball handler 3/4 court every possession. Usually there is more contact with Marquette even before the ball enters the front court and look where they are on the list. This is quite revealing.

Who needs to foul when your coach can be a 6th defender?
 
I'm sure the lack of athleticism at certain spots plays into it, and Samson definitely plays defense with his arms too much. But there do seem to be plenty of times where Newton gets hammered on a drive with no call and on the next possession a guy gets breathed on and he's shooting free throws. I'm not exactly watching these games objectively though.

Yeah I complain too, but there are definitely calls that happen in our favor that don't look even remotely close to fouls. So my guess is it all pretty much evens out in the end.
 
That shouldn't be a thing. It's where the conference needs to step in.

It's how reffing is at every level. Sucks, bit it's true. There's not evidence enough to punish a ref, but it's happening.
 
.-.
Yeah I complain too, but there are definitely calls that happen in our favor that don't look even remotely close to fouls. So my guess is it all pretty much evens out in the end.
This thread is proof that it doesn't even out in the end
 
This thread is proof that it doesn't even out in the end

Looking at number of fouls called against a particular school doesn't constitute proof. You also have to look at how many fouls were called against our opponents. Even then, teams have different playstyles. Our guards this year aren't great at staying in front of their man, which leads to drives into the paint, which leads to more foul calls.

I thought we got screwed on foul calls early on in conference play last year, but this year has been mostly even. 4 games is way too small a sample to be concerned.
 
Marquette is the mystery to me. They start harassing the ball handler 3/4 court every possession. Usually there is more contact with Marquette even before the ball enters the front court and look where they are on the list. This is quite revealing.
Big East lets that bumping and grabbing go. Seton Hall plays that way too.
 
So, this year:

In BE play: We are called for 1.5 more fouls per game than our opponents.
In OOC play: We are called for 1.7 fewer fouls per game than our opponents.
Net differential: 3.2 fouls less favorable in BE play

Last year:

In BE play: we were called for the same number of fouls as our opponents.
In OOC play: we were called for 2.3 more fouls per game than our opponents.
Net differential: 2.3 fouls more favorable in BE play

I'm surprised by last year's numbers, where it felt like we routinely got a horrible whistle in conference but I don't remember much consternation in the OOC.

But this year we are absolutely getting a much worse whistle in conference than OOC.
I am much less concerned with the fouls call on UConn that the fouls our opponents are called for. Our BE opponents getting away with turning the game into a brawl is a problem for us.
 
I am much less concerned with the fouls call on UConn that the fouls our opponents are called for. Our BE opponents getting away with turning the game into a brawl is a problem for us.

It makes for some unpleasant nights in conference but when the tournament rolls around that's pretty much in the rear view mirror. It's also why I suspect some BE teams' styles might not travel well in March.
 
Aggressive play wins, weak/passive play doesn't.

Now show me every conference - one column for total fouls, the other for total wins.

If ya win, smile and be proud. Lose? Suck it up and move on. Complaining about refs is embarrassingly weak.
 
Last edited:
.-.
Shouldn’t we be pressing less if some of these guys are getting beat off the dribble so easily? We don’t really get turnovers from playing them so tight

We don't pressure for TOs. We pressure to limit 3pt attempts. The idea is that we have Johnson/Clingan--both great shotblockers-- to mitigate the risk of a blow-by if we pressure too much.

At times teams get to the rim at-will vs us because we pressure non-shooters when our bigs aren't stopping shots at the rim. SJU last year, SHU this year comes to mind.
 
# of fouls is only part of the equation - since we can't know how many weren't called.

What feels off to me is the type of fouls called against the sides - in game it feels like UConn gets called for soft fouls a lot and their opponents don't get called for body blows. I mean in the last game some dude jumped up, landed on Castle, and no whistle. Castle was standing there like "are you kidding me?!".
 
We don't pressure for TOs. We pressure to limit 3pt attempts. The idea is that we have Johnson/Clingan--both great shotblockers-- to mitigate the risk of a blow-by if we pressure too much.

At times teams get to the rim at-will vs us because we pressure non-shooters when our bigs aren't stopping shots at the rim. SJU last year, SHU this year comes to mind.
1704836531572.png


I guess we are doing good at stopping three point attempts but they are hitting them at a decent clip. I was surprised our two point defense is so good maybe it’s just a couple games we get burnt bad.
 
View attachment 94924

I guess we are doing good at stopping three point attempts but they are hitting them at a decent clip. I was surprised our two point defense is so good maybe it’s just a couple games we get burnt bad.

Not sure you're reading that correctly. From what I'm seeing our opponents both take few attempts from deep (#17) and don't hit very many (#262).
 
Not sure you're reading that correctly. From what I'm seeing our opponents both take few attempts from deep (#17) and don't hit very many (#262).
Houston is #4 at 26.4% so it looks like our 3pt percentage allowed isn’t that great
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,289
Messages
4,561,604
Members
10,455
Latest member
UConnGabby


Top Bottom