Way too early mock WNBA draft from ESPN | Page 2 | The Boneyard

Way too early mock WNBA draft from ESPN

Joined
Apr 6, 2021
Messages
1,489
Reaction Score
5,963
Did Paige really? Even Clark insinuated it but I feel like she didn't outright say she would come back. Paige and Clark are pro ready imo and probably have been since their freshman year. But it's definitely an interesting decision either way. Im not sure Reese is as ready.
In any event I liked the mock draft. Cardoso going to Minny, battling Dorka for a roster spot..
It's interesting Diamond Johnson is not on the list.
And Hailey Van Lith going top 5 is pretty cool. I know she has her critics.
I think I like ledger walker more than Amoore but if VTech can repeat their success id have to give her the credit she is due.
Just wanted to add as far as draft depth goes, it's kinda crazy. No Ayoka Lee on this list (Ms 60+ points in a game). No Mackenzie Holmes (sounds crazy but still think she deserved big 10 player of the year last year). No Alisa Pili (Pac 12 player of the year). Lastly Taiyana Jackson who we will see early this year on Kansas (6.6 athletic big that averages a double double and was top ten in blocks).I get the hesitancy to draft some of them ( lee - injury history, Holmes - size and athleticism, Pili -size) but these are some all time, college program altering players.
I wonder if it is wisest for those with the opportunity to stay, to use their covid year because of the pending wnba expansion in 2025. Like potentially more roster spots.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2020
Messages
2,393
Reaction Score
9,855
It’s all about Azzi. Paige won’t leave until she does.
I respect loyalty. Azzi might be one of the elements in Paige's equation to stay or go after this year. But I suspect that Azzi is a very minor component in that equation. Paige has much more important things to consider in my opinion. However, none of us knows her though process. At this point maybe she doesn't either.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
5,786
Reaction Score
20,357
Just wanted to add as far as draft depth goes, it's kinda crazy. No Ayoka Lee on this list (Ms 60+ points in a game). No Mackenzie Holmes (sounds crazy but still think she deserved big 10 player of the year last year). No Alisa Pili (Pac 12 player of the year). Lastly Taiyana Jackson who we will see early this year on Kansas (6.6 athletic big that averages a double double and was top ten in blocks).I get the hesitancy to draft some of them ( lee - injury history, Holmes - size and athleticism, Pili -size) but these are some all time, college program altering players.
I wonder if it is wisest for those with the opportunity to stay, to use their covid year because of the pending wnba expansion in 2025. Like potentially more roster spots.
Yes on Lee. I really like her. She is the potential top Big on the board. Just like Paige is the potential top guard on the board, It all depends on how she recovers from her knee injury and how the draft picks line up. The Fever don’t need a young big but some of the others do.
 
Joined
Jan 7, 2020
Messages
89
Reaction Score
563
Agree that right now you probably take Clark over Paige (well, I would take Paige but I think most non UCONN fans would reasonably take Clark). But it’s pretty easy to imagine Paige having a season that would make her a clear number 1. The biggest thing preventing that is how loaded the rest of the team is.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
5,786
Reaction Score
20,357
Agree that right now you probably take Clark over Paige (well, I would take Paige but I think most non UCONN fans would reasonably take Clark). But it’s pretty easy to imagine Paige having a season that would make her a clear number 1. The biggest thing preventing that is how loaded the rest of the team is.
N. The biggest thing preventing that is lingering doubt her injuries.
 

Dillon77

WBB Enthusiast; ND Alum, Fan
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Messages
6,198
Reaction Score
22,015
I can't really even look at the projected picks for a variety of reasons, some of which have been mentioned, some of which have not.
  • One that has is that this is the last year players affected by the Covid policies can play that card, so to speak, and stay an extra year.
  • NIL money and other circumstances. Who is making big/steady money? Who wants to get a freebie year of grad school?
  • The WNBA collective bargaining agreement is done in 2025. It's one reason why so many players are signing two year deals with their current teams. Could terms of the CBA also affect incoming players in a way to make staying in college a smart move from 2024-25?
  • Expansion. Angel Reese and others' topic: give us more chances to play (by upping the amount of slots in the league). This won't happen in 2024, but 2025? Let's hope so.

Fully expect Covid-affected players and their coaches from Clark and Bueckers to Maddy Westbeld to be very attentive to these issues right up to the deadline of declaring their readiness to go pro or stay on campus. To paraphrase those English philophers Joe Stummer and Mick Jones, "should I stay or should I go?"
 

Dillon77

WBB Enthusiast; ND Alum, Fan
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Messages
6,198
Reaction Score
22,015
Just wanted to add as far as draft depth goes, it's kinda crazy. No Ayoka Lee on this list (Ms 60+ points in a game). No Mackenzie Holmes (sounds crazy but still think she deserved big 10 player of the year last year). No Alisa Pili (Pac 12 player of the year). Lastly Taiyana Jackson who we will see early this year on Kansas (6.6 athletic big that averages a double double and was top ten in blocks).I get the hesitancy to draft some of them ( lee - injury history, Holmes - size and athleticism, Pili -size) but these are some all time, college program altering players.
I wonder if it is wisest for those with the opportunity to stay, to use their covid year because of the pending wnba expansion in 2025. Like potentially more roster spots.
Good calls, all.
I'll add one of the Irish to that list: 6'3" Maddy Westbeld, who might do better in the pro's than she did in college. She's got the physical stature to handle the rough play and that jumper is sweet.

However, so much depends on all the other factors I raised in a post about two minutes ago. Players like this might decide to go in 2024 if superstars stay in college in droves. This will be really interesting
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2022
Messages
930
Reaction Score
4,220
I can't really even look at the projected picks for a variety of reasons, some of which have been mentioned, some of which have not.
  • One that has is that this is the last year players affected by the Covid policies can play that card, so to speak, and stay an extra year.
  • NIL money and other circumstances. Who is making big/steady money? Who wants to get a freebie year of grad school?
  • The WNBA collective bargaining agreement is done in 2025. It's one reason why so many players are signing two year deals with their current teams. Could terms of the CBA also affect incoming players in a way to make staying in college a smart move from 2024-25?
  • Expansion. Angel Reese and others' topic: give us more chances to play (by upping the amount of slots in the league). This won't happen in 2024, but 2025? Let's hope so.

Fully expect Covid-affected players and their coaches from Clark and Bueckers to Maddy Westbeld to be very attentive to these issues right up to the deadline of declaring their readiness to go pro or stay on campus. To paraphrase those English philophers Joe Stummer and Mick Jones, "should I stay or should I go?"
So, you think there could be a Clash of opinions on the matter?
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
6,295
Reaction Score
37,119
Could be, Bone Dog, but at that stage of their (basketball) lives, considering they almost certainly won't be playing together in the WNBA, you really think Paige will base her decision on the course of her career on what Azzi does?
You 'wowed' me for this? I think you really misunderstood my comment. I merely reflected on how much these two friends have talked about wanting to play together in college. I never said anything about the pros. Your observation that they likely won't be on the same pro team is just another incentive for Paige to stay two more years at UConn because that's how much eligibility Azzi still has.
 
Joined
Nov 8, 2021
Messages
1,753
Reaction Score
8,812
You 'wowed' me for this? I think you really misunderstood my comment. I merely reflected on how much these two friends have talked about wanting to play together in college. I never said anything about the pros. Your observation that they likely won't be on the same pro team is just another incentive for Paige to stay two more years at UConn because that's how much eligibility Azzi still has.
Still wondering if Paige would base her decision about when she leaves UConn based on Azzi's plans/eligibility, as much as they are close friends... yet who knows what goes on in someone's mind?
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,910
Reaction Score
27,130
I’ll be very surprised if Paige isn’t on the roster in November of ‘24! Regardless of whether she wins her championship this season, why would she leave UConn, a place where she is (by far) the biggest star on campus, universally adored, and where she is already making far more money than she’ll make in the W? (even if that is not strictly true, as her sponsors will likely follow her there, she clearly makes plenty of $ already here at UConn)
No one knows but Paige herself of course, but an added benefit would be further strengthening that knee ( and the rest of her body) before embarking on what will likely be a grueling pro career.
I think it is likely she will want to play in Europe as well, where she will be able to make boatloads of money! If so, she will want to make sure her body is as prepared as possible. Finally, I think she stays in order to cement her standing as one of the all time greats here at UConn!

With her non-basketball income Bueckers may decide to forgo playing in Europe. She lives the game though and may not want to spend 8 months without competing. On the other hand she might want to extend her career and taking 8 months off to train and do other things would be kinder to her body. Or maybe she'll go to China like Maya. Shorter season and an amazingly diverse culture to explore. And the income opportunities for Bueckers in the far east are immense.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,910
Reaction Score
27,130
You 'wowed' me for this? I think you really misunderstood my comment. I merely reflected on how much these two friends have talked about wanting to play together in college. I never said anything about the pros. Your observation that they likely won't be on the same pro team is just another incentive for Paige to stay two more years at UConn because that's how much eligibility Azzi still has.

That's going to a factor in what she does. She sold Fudd on coming to UConn based on them playing together. They expected to play together for 3 years and so far it's zero. It's unlikely that they will play together in the pros except on the national team. I wouldn't be surprised if she stayed another year just to get in 2 years.
 

MilfordHusky

Voice of Reason
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
37,358
Reaction Score
127,088
Recall that Phee and Stewie are establishing a 3x3 league, so players may not go to Europe/Asia/Australia as often.
 

nwhoopfan

hopeless West Coast homer
Joined
Feb 16, 2017
Messages
30,106
Reaction Score
57,428
I hear you. I see different things. Stanford has done a very good job of using her in ways that don't lay bare her weaknesses.
Wow, do we ever see it differently. I think Stanford has mostly been hiding how dominant she can be. We've seen flashes. Maybe this year, with so many graduations and transfers, we'll get to see it more often.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
6,910
Reaction Score
27,130
N. The biggest thing preventing that is lingering doubt her injuries.

I don't think that's what you meant. She could lead the country in scoring, assists and steals and there would still be doubt and worry. I'll worry about both Fudd and Bueckers but doubt and worry are largely irrational.
Can Raven Johnson's knee stand 25-30 min a game? I don't remember any doubts last preseason about her coming back after her ACL.
Bueckers is a hot item in the media and the media will be telling us about her "fragile knee" all season. That's the nature of the media.
 
Joined
Apr 11, 2020
Messages
2,393
Reaction Score
9,855
That's going to a factor in what she does. She sold Fudd on coming to UConn based on them playing together. They expected to play together for 3 years and so far it's zero. It's unlikely that they will play together in the pros except on the national team. I wouldn't be surprised if she stayed another year just to get in 2 years.
If playing with Azzi next year, and maybe the year after, is the sole reason for Paige staying then Azzi should do her friend a favor and smack her upside the head.
 

CL82

NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions - Again!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
59,016
Reaction Score
219,678
1) Both Clark and Bueckers will be great additions to the teams that draft them, when they declare for the draft.

Agree. I also think that both are going to be really good for the WNBA as a league. Clark and Bueckers (and you could throw Azzi in there as well) are electric players that are fun to watch. I think of it as being similar to when Bird and Magic joined the NBA.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
5,786
Reaction Score
20,357
I don't think that's what you meant. She could lead the country in scoring, assists and steals and there would still be doubt and worry. I'll worry about both Fudd and Bueckers but doubt and worry are largely irrational.
Can Raven Johnson's knee stand 25-30 min a game? I don't remember any doubts last preseason about her coming back after her ACL.
Bueckers is a hot item in the media and the media will be telling us about her "fragile knee" all season. That's the nature of the media.
There were plenty of doubts in the preseason. Raven played some in the early season, but her starts didn’t happen til the stretch run. There are still questions about whether she is 100% what she was before the injury. Plus, Raven has been injured once. It’s twice for Paige.

The pros are unemotional. They look at everything. And it will be a factor they consider, If they consider Paige and Clark equal, 11 teams would choose Clark because of Paiges’ injury history - unless Minnesota trades for the first choice. It would cost them but I could see them trying it to get Paige to sell more tickets.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
5,786
Reaction Score
20,357
Agree. I also think that both are going to be really good for the WNBA as a league. Clark and Bueckers (and you could throw Azzi in there as well) are electric players that are fun to watch. I think of it as being similar to when Bird and Magic joined the NBA.
Azzi has shown nothing near the level of play of B&C. Great shooter but other than shooting she hasn’t shown what the other two have- the ability to carry her team to the championship game.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2011
Messages
7,415
Reaction Score
24,147
Good calls, all.
I'll add one of the Irish to that list: 6'3" Maddy Westbeld, who might do better in the pro's than she did in college. She's got the physical stature to handle the rough play and that jumper is sweet.

However, so much depends on all the other factors I raised in a post about two minutes ago. Players like this might decide to go in 2024 if superstars stay in college in droves. This will be really interesting
YES!! I am a huge Maddy fan, throw in Kylee Watson as well. Maddy gives me that pro level vibe. That is why I am hoping that the WNBA adds two teams over the next 2-4 years. I hate to see players of Maddy's skill set just sitting on the bench not playing or getting 4-8 minutes a game.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2022
Messages
6,295
Reaction Score
37,119
I'll add one of the Irish to that list: 6'3" Maddy Westbeld, who might do better in the pro's than she did in college.
I completely agree about Westbeld and Watson. Two very pro-ready players. I’m surprised neither was mentioned in Michael’s mock draft.

Also, just to be fair, I can’t really fathom how Cardoso doesn’t go a lot higher in the mock draft. Certainly ahead of Reese, whom she shutdown last season and will likely do so again. And maybe ahead of Brink. A mobile 6’7” player with soft hands who runs the floor really well, has a good touch around the rim and is a proficient rim protector. Maybe Caitlin and Paige go ahead of her if they opt for the draft this year. But I have a feeling Cardoso will have a tremendous pro career.
 

Dillon77

WBB Enthusiast; ND Alum, Fan
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Messages
6,198
Reaction Score
22,015
With all due respect to Michael Voepel, he can be blinded by the lights.
Tell me, if you read this about a projected #5 pick, would you pull the trigger?

"Considering their depth in the post, the (Dallas) Wings might opt for another guard with clutch shooting ability. Fill-in-the-blank (19.7 points per game last season) hasn't been considered a top-tier defender or distributor, but she will work on both aspects of her game this season after transferring to LSU from Louisville. It will be intriguing to see how she plays on a new team with so much talent. If she becomes a stronger all-around player, she will be more appealing as a pro."

Yes, I'm writing about Haily Van Lith, who Vopel has pegged at #5. Now, I'm in the midst of watching the Dallas Wings vs. the Aces and I agree with the 'depth in the post" part and maybe even the need for another outside shooter. However....

- I don't think spending a #5 pick on a 5'7" shooting guard who can run hot/very cold who is a "meh" defender at best or playmaker is the best use of the pick.. She'll have to show a lot this season to justify that high a pick, in my opinion. Also, why spend a #5 on a back-up shooting guard who will mostly watch Arike play?

- Dallas, knock on wood on with the injury gods, but Diamond DeShields and Lou Lopez-Senechal will be back from injury next year so that should also cover the wing spot, which Dallas could use.

- So, if you're looking for a shooting guard who plays defense and a handle, I'd rather give a player like Jacy Sheldon a chance. A Grace Berger-type of technically sound player who you can count on.

- BTW, regarding choosing a point guard for the Wings: Georgia Amorre is smart and shoots very well, too, but doesn't Crystal Dangerfeld do that, too? And Valerie Burton is there, but she's not really a scorer; having had her time dry up once Odyssey Sims was signed. Ah, what the heck, in GM Greg Bibb's world, the more is merrier.
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
2,805
Reaction Score
14,782
If you want a potential superstar, you take Clark. If you want a potential superstar with injury history, you take Paige.
So, if Clark gets injured twice this year will she also become a “potential superstar with injury history?” If I recall correctly, the “goat“ pg (Sue) could also have been labeled as having an injury history yet had an extremely long and successful career in the pros. The truth is, there’s no reliable way of predicting this kind of thing. Paige could play 12 more years and never suffer another injury or Clark could suffer a career ending injury tomorrow (God forbid)!
Sure, there are some instances where it is clear that a long career is doubtful, Morgan Tuck for example, but that’s because she had a clearly identifiable problem, (cartilage issues in her knee) that could be clearly IDed as likely to recur. Bill Walton, whose surgeon once compared the bones in his feet to ”peanut butter” was another example of a generational talent whose body was obviously not going to hold up for a long career. Our own Brittany Hunter was another supreme talent whose body betrayed her, though, to be fair, I believe her issue may have been a botched surgical procedure. Paige, as far as I can tell, has no such problem.
If I were drafting,I would definitely choose Paige over Clark as long as my medical staff found no chronic issues. Clark is great, she excites the fans with 35 ft threes but I believe Paige is simply a better player overall.
Admittedly, you really couldn’t go wrong with either of them, but imo, the material reason why anyone would choose Clark over Paige, is the injury thing. I believe if Paige had never suffered an injury, there would be no debate. So, really it comes down to whether you believe that Paige‘s two injuries were a result of some congenital weakness in her body or were rather freak injuries that simply happened.
 
Joined
Aug 8, 2013
Messages
2,805
Reaction Score
14,782
I don't see Brink up there, though she'll have a chance to broaden her game and show stamina and strength this season.
I am surprised to see Hailey Van Lith so high on this list! With all due respect, she is small, a middling shooter, and has no history as an effective point guard. She certainly has not shown herself (so far) to be to be anything but what she is, a scrappy, average shooting guard who has to take a lot of shots (18) in order to maintain her 19.7 point average.
She will certainly have to play pg in the pros yet has shown little to no inclination or talent for that position. It has been speculated that she left Louisville, whose head coach she had praised profusely the previous year, and went to LSU, basically for two reasons; one: to win a championship, two: to play point guard as preparation for the W. l am doubtful as to whether she can make that transition in the first place and also whether Kim will stick with her in that position if she struggles.
I wish her all the best though, as I truly do admire the feistiness, obvious hard work, will to win, and dedication that has led her to a place where she could be #5 on a mock draft for the premiere professional women’s league in the world. I will be shocked though, if she ends up being drafted at that level.
I suppose there is a scenario where it could happen though. If, as some are predicting, Paige, Caitlin, and Angel all stay for their covid year (and she (Hailey Van Lith) actually shows some point guard ability this season, then, in the absence of several of the biggest stars, she could possibly rise to #5 by default.
This leads me to another question. Would Geno want Cameron Brink if she entered the portal for her covid year? I’m thinking yes!
 
Last edited:

Online statistics

Members online
80
Guests online
1,405
Total visitors
1,485

Forum statistics

Threads
158,951
Messages
4,174,931
Members
10,044
Latest member
Chino323


.
Top Bottom