Dogbreath2U
RIP, DB2U
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 3,495
- Reaction Score
- 6,708
My sources tell me.....
You mean ESPN! LOL old news now!My sources tell me.....
Good day...
That was the point, after all.You mean ESPN! LOL old news now!
I don't see how this is a good hire for the Lakers. Luke Walton is basically a player still. He has no head coaching experience.
And don't give me the 28 game win streak during Kerr's absence, because my dog could have coached the Warriors this year and they still would've won ruffly the same number of games.
It's like the Lakers can't let go of their glory days and move into a rebuilding phase. They gave Kobe like half their salary cap the last few years, hired Byron Scott, signed Metta f*king World Peace and now hired Luke Walton.
I don't see how this is a good hire for the Huskies. Kevin Ollie is basically a player still. He has no head coaching experience.I don't see how this is a good hire for the Lakers. Luke Walton is basically a player still. He has no head coaching experience.
And don't give me the 28 game win streak during Kerr's absence, because my dog could have coached the Warriors this year and they still would've won ruffly the same number of games.
That's not a fair comparison. College basketball vs. one of the most storied franchises in the history of sports. I never had a problem with hiring Ollie. He came with high praise from everyone he's ever been in contact with and was hand-picked by Calhoun.I don't see how this is a good hire for the Huskies. Kevin Ollie is basically a player still. He has no head coaching experience.
And don't give me the 2014 championship, because my dog could have coached Jim Calhoun's recruits that year and they would have got roughly as far in the tournament.
I'm assuming you're referring to me...For all the reasons you could s___ on the Lakers, this seems like a strange one. It seems like the only decent decision they've made recently.