I enjoy the seeding exercise bc it's a bit of jigsaw puzzle, trying to keep teams from the same conference apart and also teams closer to home. Here's my first crack:
View attachment 18207
I'mm'a keep on saying this in whatever forum I see these discussions happen: imo, whatever team wins the Pac-12 (and/or is granted the highest tourney seed in the Pac-12) deserves to be placed in the CA regional. In your draft above, the best team in the Northeast (1-seed UConn) stays in the Northeast (CT). The best team in the Southeast (1-seed South Carolina) stays in the Southeast (KY). The best team in the Southwest (1-seed Baylor) stays in the Southwest (OK). But the best team on the West Coast (2-seed UCLA) gets shipped to the Northeast (CT). Meanwhile, the 3rd-best team on the West Coast (3-seed Stanford) gets placed in the CA regional. UCLA, in effect, gets punished for winning the Pac-12, while Stanford gets rewarded for coming in 3rd in the Pac-12. That's backwards, imo, and I really hope the seeding committee doesn't do that to whoever wins the conference.
Even though I doubt it will happen, can you put Tennessee in UCONN'S bracket ?
It makes me feel warm all over.
He has Kentucky not in Lexington which I didn't think was possible?
So you consider it better to be a #3 seed than a #2 seed?
The difficulty here is that I have MD as the overall #4 team - thus explaining why it gets shipped the West - and UCLA as the overall #8. Putting the #4 & #8 in the same region makes it much weaker than the other 3 regions, which isn't fair to the other teams.
A long way to go.
So you consider it better to be a #3 seed than a #2 seed?
Yes, as a UCLA fan, I would much much much rather see my team be a 3-seed in Stockton than a 2-seed in Bridgeport. It's not even close. It's not even close to close.
Seeing your bracket and Charlie's bracket (both of which send the Pac-12 champ to Bridgeport and the Pac-12's #3 team to Stockton) makes me hope my team loses just the right number of games a Pac-12 team has to lose in order to be seeded in the Stockton regional... a perverse distortion of the normal impulse that teams ought to have: to win absolutely every regular season (and conference tourney) game that they possibly can, in order to maximize their seeding/placement advantage in the NCAA tourney.
I'll take that bracket in a heartbeat!Bracketology with Charlie Creme
I'll take UConn's bracket #2 Cal, #3 Louisville #4 Virginia Tech. Don't see Va Tech ending up as a #4 seed, probably lower.
Here is the updated bracketology: Bracketology with Charlie Creme
3 AAC teams? Intersting and oddly the third isn't Temple but Tulane.
If they sent us to Stockton after sending us to Sioux Falls last year, the NCAA is garbage.
If they sent us to Stockton after sending us to Sioux Falls last year, the NCAA is garbage.
At least have the Regionals in desirable locations, lol.
Yes, as a UCLA fan, I would much much much rather see my team be a 3-seed in Stockton than a 2-seed in Bridgeport. It's not even close. It's not even close to close.
I agree. But honestly, at this point, I don't see a team that could stop us from getting to the final 4. As long as UCONN remains the top #1 seed, or perhaps the 2nd #1 seed, they won't have to face the 5th, 6th, or maybe even 7th best team in the nation. Having said that, I'd prefer to NOT see Maryland, Notre Dame, or FSU in our elite 8 bracket...I'll take that bracket in a heartbeat!