- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 26,062
- Reaction Score
- 70,716
If this is true then it further credits that the leak was an intentional sabotage to a bball first podcaster by likely a bball first donor. Especially with the way it was worded to stir the pot ...imminent. When it was anything but....
We should assume that any leaks going forward that don't come from a more credible source like Dodd etc is an attempt to sabotage UConn bball leaving the BEAST.
You should ALWAYS assume that everyone is being strategic, and that any information, leaks have an agenda attached to them. Sometimes they're true, but you should always consider "who might benefit from this info being false?"
This has always been true, but moreso in the internet/24-hours news days. It's media consumption 101.