WBBTakeover
It's that time again...
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2024
- Messages
- 1,363
- Reaction Score
- 2,633
How tall is this child???? Because if she's "only" 6'3, then Dawn must really be 5'2.

Agree with this.I think SC has gotten just about as much out of Feagin as you could ask since Watkins went down, but the team just doesn’t have a good matchup for a Betts or Oldacre-type post.
SC matches up well with ND, UConn, and LSU.
Doesn’t match up very well with UCLA or Texas.
I’m somewhat in the middle on USC.
It’s going to be all about the draw and the path come tournament time.
Didn’t SC beat Texas by a lot the 1st time?I think SC has gotten just about as much out of Feagin as you could ask since Watkins went down, but the team just doesn’t have a good matchup for a Betts or Oldacre-type post.
SC matches up well with ND, UConn, and LSU.
Doesn’t match up very well with UCLA or Texas.
I’m somewhat in the middle on USC.
It’s going to be all about the draw and the path come tournament time.
They did but it was one of the weirdest games I’ve ever seen. They got murdered on the glass and had something like 25 fewer field goal attempts. Texas just shot abysmally poorly. SC was in the game until the very end today and absolutely had a chance to win but I don’t think any SC fans expected a similar game in the rematch.Didn’t SC beat Texas by a lot the 1st time?
The whole thing is weird to me, but we'll get some clarity the next couple of weeks after (1) the Southern Cal-UCLA games and (2) the LSU/Texas game. For what it's worth, I don't see Notre Dame losing in the ACC (it's possible), but if they did--it may be to a surging NC State (don't think Duke has what it takes to challenge them).We fell to #4 in the AP. I don't know if I agree with that. Notre Dame, Texas and South Carolina all have 2 losses. Just based on the losses, I think South Carolina should have remained at #2. Texas has in the past 10 days had a 16 point loss and a 4 point win against South Carolina. I thought they would still value South Carolina over Texas in the rankings, but I guess not. I guess they value the recency of the loss over the whole picture. Notre Dame's two losses are much worse than Texas or South Carolina.
I would have ranked them:
1. UCLA
2. South Carolina
3. Texas
4. Notre Dame
I assume in bracketology we'll still be considered the #2 overall seed since that takes in the picture as a whole.
From your perspective, why is Notre Dame below Texas? Wouldn't their win over Texas put them ahead?We fell to #4 in the AP. I don't know if I agree with that. Notre Dame, Texas and South Carolina all have 2 losses. Just based on the losses, I think South Carolina should have remained at #2. Texas has in the past 10 days had a 16 point loss and a 4 point win against South Carolina. I thought they would still value South Carolina over Texas in the rankings, but I guess not. I guess they value the recency of the loss over the whole picture. Notre Dame's two losses are much worse than Texas or South Carolina.
I would have ranked them:
1. UCLA
2. South Carolina
3. Texas
4. Notre Dame
I assume in bracketology we'll still be considered the #2 overall seed since that takes in the picture as a whole.
I understand the sentiment but Texas's two losses are not as bad as Notre Dame's. Texas has losses to the current #2 and #4 teams. South Carolina has losses to the current #1 and #3 teams. Notre Dame has losses to #11 and an unranked team.From your perspective, why is Notre Dame below Texas? Wouldn't their win over Texas put them ahead?
An overtime win - at home? That doesn't count as much for Notre Dame as their losss to Utah,From your perspective, why is Notre Dame below Texas? Wouldn't their win over Texas put them ahead?i