MilfordHusky
Voice of Reason
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 37,437
- Reaction Score
- 127,712
Cameron is rather small and dated, but also iconic. Has there been discussion about expanding or replacing it?Interesting thread.
Cameron is rather small and dated, but also iconic. Has there been discussion about expanding or replacing it?Interesting thread.
Classic photograph. No freaking way would I do that.Notice they have 3 lines tethering them so should they fall it would only be a minor fall--unlike the Empire State construction--no tethers---100 times higher.
Maybe, or maybe not. It depends on whether they used the exact same roof design or not. It's obviously a pretty high maintenance choice, given the cost to replace it is what, more than a third of what it cost to build the entire place 27 years ago?
The cost estimate to repair and renovate the Houses of Parliament is about $9 Billion.A new roof costs a third of the original price after 27 years? Peanuts. The Arrigoni Bridge was built in 1938 for 3.5 million. After 62 years it cost $35 million just to repaint it.
I will be shocked if the roof is done by the start of the season. This is a unique roof and there is little history for estimating. Having worked with construction contracts for the government I can almost guarantee that unexpected issues will arise that will extend the completion date.
Maybe lots of away games early in the season?A new roof costs a third of the original price after 27 years? Peanuts. The Arrigoni Bridge was built in 1938 for 3.5 million. After 62 years it cost $35 million just to repaint it.
I will be shocked if the roof is done by the start of the season. This is a unique roof and there is little history for estimating. Having worked with construction contracts for the government I can almost guarantee that unexpected issues will arise that will extend the completion date.
Six seasons of away games. I think, by having the members move out for 6 years or so, they can keep the cost down to $9 billion.Maybe lots of away games early in the season?
Ok now we don't feel so badSix seasons of away games. I think, by having the members move out for 6 years or so, they can keep the cost down to $9 billion.
Home | Palace of Westminster Restoration and Renewal
Palace of Westminster renovation 'could take 32 years and cost £5.7bn'
Cameron is rather small and dated, but also iconic. Has there been discussion about expanding or replacing it?
On a recent history Channel it was said--pictures like this were staged with a photo back drop---Classic photograph. No freaking way would I do that.
A new roof costs a third of the original price after 27 years? Peanuts. The Arrigoni Bridge was built in 1938 for 3.5 million. After 62 years it cost $35 million just to repaint it.
I will be shocked if the roof is done by the start of the season. This is a unique roof and there is little history for estimating. Having worked with construction contracts for the government I can almost guarantee that unexpected issues will arise that will extend the completion date.
I believe the actual quote was: A Million here and a million there--pretty soon we are talking real money! I guess it was updated to the Billion because no one would believe a million was a lot of money---Just think a millionaire today --would only be worth 50,000 in 1960.As the late Everett Dirksen famously said, "A billion here, a billion there , pretty soon, you're talking real money."
P.S. This is a real Time cover.
Miss leading cost differentials- and better quality paint -higher paid painters--multiply the 1938 cost by about 30---the Gampel original costs by 20 and it brings them closer to the current equivalent with inflation adjusted costs. 1938 prices were depression cost--material and labor were about the lowest of the century.
Politician--usually don't do the hard thing--spend the money now --buy more, buy better-now--but 25 years from now is a long time --not! Rt 81 is being widened and repaired and bridges/cross overs added--the once farm or wooded land--now has houses on it--COSTs
The real cost of removing LEAD paint is the Labor--unless they are now using robots--and the poopy suits, breathing apparatus, the clean up areas--the containment, rules and regulation---lead paint removal --IS Labor intensive---jobs that take an hour-with regulations are hours longer--Time is money--look in the clock. Protecting rivers is pushing the late button--but I'm for it---there are extremely few, if ANY, clean rivers left-- However --since the day man walked upright--he threw everything into rivers or the ocean. Out of sight--out of mind.The high cost of painting had nothing to do with the cost of either the new paint or the labor, it was the cost of removing the old lead paint, none of which could be allowed to pollute the river.
You are right about elected officials being near-sighted. They see only as far as the next election.
I missed your reference to --lead paint containment in your initial posting--that alone would have tilted the cost --as you so artfully stated in the follow up. Are you sure your aren't a senator???The high cost of painting had nothing to do with the cost of either the new paint or the labor, it was the cost of removing the old lead paint, none of which could be allowed to pollute the river.
You are right about elected officials being near-sighted. They see only as far as the next election.
I missed your reference to --lead paint containment in your initial posting--that alone would have tilted the cost --as you so artfully stated in the follow up. Are you sure your aren't a senator???
Is this you?In my foolish pre-college youth---I worked on a domed roof, and in that time--no one thought of tethering--it got in the way of work--and there was always another nut needing the job.
Do what all my neighbors do: PUT A BLUE TARP OVER ANY HOLES IN THE ROOF!Completion date is end of October, and First Night is still cancelled.
The project manager on the job is planning on putting out a video update on progress next week. I will make sure it gets posted here.
When I came to CT in August 1973 from MO I went up to Hartford on Route 85 to Route 11 to Route 2. Coming home I had to get off in Salem and back to 85. I was told that the Route 11 project ran out of money falling $11 million short. You would think some visionary would say it's only going to get MORE expensive if we delay! Now some state agencies are saying it'll take close to a billion $ to finish Route 11! Keeping the dangerous 85 as one of the methods of getting to Hartford!
Back in the '90's East Lyme wanted to put additions on ELHS for the academic end and also a pool and field house complex.
The plans were drawn up with the pool being in the basement with 100 lockers for boys and 100 lockers for girls, training room, PE classrooms, and BB court and offices on first floor. The financing had approximately 72% returned by the state & federal! At the last minute they eliminated the athletic addition. They just put a pool in. After construction was finished the school board wanted to add an athletic addition and was priced out leaving an educational section for the 21st century and an athletic section that is back in the 1960's!
Two examples where forward planning would have solved many problems we face today in CT and EL!
I only wish---I was lucky --I got to enjoy the fresh air, winter or summer--. Funny, it was fun while doing it--retrospect --maybe not so great.Is this you?
Not at all. My post wasn't intended to be artful. The contract was titled "Painting of Bridge No XXX Arrigoni Bridge (Rte 66) over the CT River. (I don't recall the Br #).It's normal that steel bridge painting jobs includes the removal of the old paint. Perhaps I should have assumed that most aren't as familiar with this type of project as I so for that I apologize. My entire reason for posting was to show that the cost of repairing public structures is often much more than the original cost of those structures, not to mislead.
Labor is certainly a large part of the cost but it's the fact that they had to use containment and maintain negative air pressure within the containment that made it so expensive. It's not the hourly rate of the workers but the enormous amount of time that process involves. That and the fact that the bridge had to be kept open to traffic for the entire time.
Furthermore, it's not public employees who design and build these structures. It's done by private industry. But then, as we saw during the Rowland administration, elected officials can't always be trusted to hire the most qualified or efficient private contractors.