- Joined
- Dec 14, 2015
- Messages
- 8,762
- Reaction Score
- 59,022
A win considering what it could’ve been.Sure doesn't feel like a win.
A win considering what it could’ve been.Sure doesn't feel like a win.
Should he have ever came back as soon as he did?
He was clearly never “right”
I thinking and hoping Hurley might try DC and Samson on the floor at the same time. It would definitely take some of the defensive pressure off of DC and might shield him so to speak from getting whacked under the basket, tripping or falling, etc. and would also help with rebounding, and also might give open shots for Newton, Cam, and Karaban on the perimeter.Trust the trainer. He was in the locker room with DC. He knew the situation better than anyone else.
He talked to DC when he went back to the bench and saw his movement.
He's definitely going to fall behind, but hopefully he peaks at the right time....he's a big guy being asked to play a lot of minutes....might keep the rest of his body somewhat more fresh compared to the competition when tourney time begins.I’m worried he’s going to have to recondition again like he did at the start of the season. He was just getting back into regular shape.
We have no way of knowing. But I just don’t think he was fully healthy when he returned. All of the wincing and the running gingerly was worrisome. We’ve been staring at this elephant in the room since he came back.These things aren’t black and white.
Another way to put it is that waiting an extra 2 weeks would not have substantially lowered his risk for re-injury.
Obviously it sucks but if he needed surgery he’d be out for the yearSure doesn't feel like a win.
NopeDid anyone really think he was going to play?
No freaking idea why they had him playing vs the Pine Bluffs of the world.
You think the fact that he played against Arkansas Pine Bluff led to the ankle injury he suffered 11 days later?
To be fair, it seems it’s not an ankle injury after all.You think the fact that he played against Arkansas Pine Bluff led to the ankle injury he suffered 11 days later?
No, this isn’t necessarily correct. Could be a peroneal tendon issue which would absolutely feel like an ankle sprain pre-MRI but would be a lot less painful. This also makes sense with Dr. Dan saying there wasn’t much swelling.To be fair, it seems it’s not an ankle injury after all.
As far as big men and feet, I think Joel sat out for 2-3 years to fully heal his when he got to Philly (which they had no problem doing because of “The Process”) and Chet I think had foot issues too which made him miss his first year.I posted pretty quickly that it did not look like an ankle. We won’t get anything else from UConn, so we can speculate and guess, but for those of us that have played sports and pay attention to detail, you kind of block out what coaches and others say about injuries. It is all BS and more with Hurley than most any coach I have seen. He has his reasons for being guarded about an injury, so take it as a statement and not criticism. But anyone who really watched and thought that was an ankle injury my suggestion is to pay attention better. I pledge not to post on this topic again. I will close by saying this. If we see DC back on the floor in January we will be lucky. And if he is on the floor in January we should be crossing fingers, legs and eyes that we don’t have a rinse and repeat issue. Big men and feet, only one solution time, time and more time. When you think they are ready wait longer. He hurt it on a pretty low impact play. He was never right and finally let it loose because he got it in his head that he was being tentative for no good reason. His body knew why he was being tentative. So as soon as he starts looking like DC wham re-injured.