- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 5,805
- Reaction Score
- 15,836
lol what? This qualifies for the hall of fame of dumbest Boneyard posts of all time.I'm from the camp that decisions have consequences, so live with them. If BU had only three goaltenders, then they ASSUMED THE RISK. Why should any other HE team be disadvantaged by their decision making? I don't think it's a matter of old school/new school, but more of a reflection of today's societal norm that "it's not my fault".
Most teams in fact only have three goaltenders. It literally says in the NCAA rule book that you cannot suit more than three goaltenders - it's actually a bench minor to suit four goalies.
One of BU's is already in Covid protocols. The other got hurt in practice yesterday afternoon. That leaves one goalie. Add on to that no team has the ability to quickly (<24 hours) add roster players without them passing testing protocols. Hence we end up here and....
It also says in the NCAA rule book that a team cannot play with one suited goalie.
Nice try creating a strawman here. This is strictly NCAA rules with the added conditions of prior Covid infection. Nothing more, nothing less.
I guarantee you Ashton Abel would've seen 0 time this weekend, BU's current starting goalie remains uninjured and able to play. This injury would have no effect on the BU lineup. BU's best player still won't play tomorrow and my understanding is still would not play in a Sunday/Monday/Tuesday makeup game if it occurred. Therefore there's no argument here BU is "ducking" UConn to play them later with Farrance and Commesso back.
If BU were interested in "ducking" a team, wouldn't they have done it two weeks ago against BC while down their #1 goalie, Hobey-caliber defenseman, and four top-6 forwards including all 3 captains?
Last edited: