For the rest of you - other than this Z guy
It makes no sense for a University to let a third party developer OWN this property or sell land
What I’m trying to convey ... there are Public Finance Vehicles (Tax Exempt Bonds at tiny interest rates and 30 year fully amortizing) and they do gimmicks that may fool a Newspaper writer ... but are done commonly to protect bond holders & the Public Entity.
I’m certain I am right - because I do this for a living. The Bonds fully amortize in 30. The University - a related party - owns the Facility outright at that point (the Shell LLC made up goes away & the Fee Developer never has ownership). There’s no frigging way a third party developer owns a University building today; manage it - yes. But earlier we saw the University does maintenance; another key Term - it’s run like all the other athletic facilities. Management means (possibly) being the employer of staff & some tasks.
Development Fees are significant for the developer. Etc etc
Try going more than 5 posts without mentioning how important you are. Try it.
Fishy does private development and is very good at it. You'd never know it, because he manages to not talk about how great he is all the time like you do.
I don't understand why UConn doesn't just bond the entire arena. Make a real, legitimate effort. Which this is not. In any way, shape or form. Its totally half-cocked and doesn't need you going all third eye to say how Actually, Its Good.
PS- 95% of Robert Moses' developments should be torn down and thrown in the dustbin of history. And every public benefit corporation should be rendered illegal. Every one of them.