UConn's most clutch: Shabazz vs. Kemba | Page 2 | The Boneyard

UConn's most clutch: Shabazz vs. Kemba

Status
Not open for further replies.

August_West

Conscience do cost
Joined
Aug 29, 2011
Messages
51,422
Reaction Score
90,631
Loved Rip and he got his points at big times, but at winning time on that team it was El-Amin who ran the show.
 
Joined
Aug 25, 2011
Messages
14,040
Reaction Score
75,037
Loved Rip and he got his points at big times, but at winning time on that team it was El-Amin who ran the show.

I don't know. Khalid had a flair for the dramatic but his 0-fer against Gonzaga and airball at 75-74 get lost in the shuffle all the time. Lot of moxie though, obviously.

I will say that every time I think about the "most clutch" I only think about that '99 team collectively on March 29. I don't think that feeling when Langdon fell and the horn goes off will ever be duplicated. The will of that team was just tremendous, no fear whatsoever and they collectively nutted up and won a big time game against a team that most people thought was invincible. The game plan, the execution, all of it was just tremendous. What a team that was.
 

UConnSwag11

Storrs, CT The Mecca
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
14,199
Reaction Score
55,665
I thought AJ Price was pretty clutch in his last year (or two) - carried the 2009 team on offense more than once seemingly more by willing the ball in the hoop than any other reason. Maybe not in the same class as some of these other guys but carrying a team to a final 4 seems worth mentioning.
I almost jumped and yelled as much as i did when kemba beat pitt at msg

 

sdhusky

1972,73 & 98 Boneyard Poster of the Year
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
9,272
Reaction Score
6,556
I guess some of this depends on what is meant by most clutch. My putting Kemba at the top spot with Bazz closing the gap quickly is weighted more heavily on a winning time criteria, which is not a complete picture of clutch.

A player can have a horrible game but then knock down a big shot or makes a string of plays during the last 2 1/2 or so minutes of the game, such as the Nova guard who's name escapes me that I think was scoreless till he hit the game winning 3 against some top 25 opponent about a week or so ago.

This doesn't take into account performances where the player performs at a high level throughout a game making big time plays when the stakes are at their highest and is the primary contributor to the W.

Bazz has been remarkable this season where he's not only make a slew of winning time plays to help pull out the W, but he's been hitting some key baskets at some critical points in the game to prevent the opponent from pulling away for a big lead. Bazz made some huge plays when UF had extended the lead to 2-scores or more at different points in the game. One was on a 3 and another was a pass to Giffey who knocked down a big-time 3. It just seemed like whenever UF was about to shift the momentum, Bazz would knock down a big-time shot to move the needle in our favor.

Kemba was the same way. As time goes by, I can't remember how Rip was in this regard, but he was probably similar.

Rip's teams weren't in nearly as many close games and Bazz or Kemba
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
6,189
Reaction Score
19,930
sdhusky said:
Rip's teams weren't in nearly as many close games and Bazz or Kemba

Rip was really good at dagger shots. Up four with a minute to go, burying the 3 at the end of the shot clock that put a bow on it. He daggered Indiana in the second round of the NCAA before Washington (I think it was a corner 3 with a 3 point lead), and did it to Ohio State on a double-clutch in the FF. And a bunch in the regular season too - since we tended to let teams hang around. He also was remarkable carrying us past Gonzaga despite a box and one, with KEA on sabbatical. He beat them with two dump down passes to Jake for layups after scoring 24 on maybe 9-13 shooting.

Not as memorable as buzzer beaters, but Rip trademarked the clinching dagger.
 
Joined
Sep 14, 2013
Messages
1,208
Reaction Score
2,597
As of now it is Walker due to the significance of the buzzer beaters and great step backs. The guy was clutch and wonderfully talented!

However, Napier is a strong second and if he continues to pull those stunts he might overtake Walker. A player whose stock is rising to the top. He gotta keep it going!
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
3,097
Reaction Score
6,340
I guess some of this depends on what is meant by most clutch. My putting Kemba at the top spot with Bazz closing the gap quickly is weighted more heavily on a winning time criteria, which is not a complete picture of clutch.

A player can have a horrible game but then knock down a big shot or makes a string of plays during the last 2 1/2 or so minutes of the game, such as the Nova guard who's name escapes me that I think was scoreless till he hit the game winning 3 against some top 25 opponent about a week or so ago.

This doesn't take into account performances where the player performs at a high level throughout a game making big time plays when the stakes are at their highest and is the primary contributor to the W.

Bazz has been remarkable this season where he's not only make a slew of winning time plays to help pull out the W, but he's been hitting some key baskets at some critical points in the game to prevent the opponent from pulling away for a big lead. Bazz made some huge plays when UF had extended the lead to 2-scores or more at different points in the game. One was on a 3 and another was a pass to Giffey who knocked down a big-time 3. It just seemed like whenever UF was about to shift the momentum, Bazz would knock down a big-time shot to move the needle in our favor.

Kemba was the same way. As time goes by, I can't remember how Rip was in this regard, but he was probably similar.
Try another good Bazz thread from earlier in the season worth a look back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
288
Guests online
1,797
Total visitors
2,085

Forum statistics

Threads
161,123
Messages
4,251,714
Members
10,097
Latest member
Burnt Corn


.
Top Bottom