- Joined
- Apr 29, 2024
- Messages
- 203
- Reaction Score
- 1,019
Yeah,,, btw, I can't wait to see Nathan McHaney play at Gampbell Puhvillione.come on man, the hilarious misspellings are on the other thread
Yeah,,, btw, I can't wait to see Nathan McHaney play at Gampbell Puhvillione.come on man, the hilarious misspellings are on the other thread
Pssh that's Nathan Mahoney.Yeah,,, btw, I can't wait to see Nathan McHaney play at Gampbell Puhvillione.
They should do a study and plan for it, if a recent one doesn't already exist. At least to show some consideration if by a miracle we get into a stable power conference.I would love it but on-campus football is whole other beast. Very tall task.
They are still paying off the stadium in Hartford there is zero chance they build a new stadium on campus at this pointThey should do a study and plan for it, if a recent one doesn't already exist. At least to show some consideration if by a miracle we get into a stable power conference.
I can't endorse spending millions of dollars on a bluff.They should do a study and plan for it, if a recent one doesn't already exist. At least to show some consideration if by a miracle we get into a stable power conference.
When I saw this article I was confused because aren’t they already in the early phases of remodeling the XL Center? That reno is already a $100M project, can’t imagine the state managing to afford both.
If USF can do it we can do it tooI can't endorse spending millions of dollars on a bluff.
That doesn't convince me.If USF can do it we can do it too
They’re working that too:
-> A decade-old push to renovate downtown Hartford’s aging XL Center that recently suffered a setback amid rising costs could get a significant boost of as much as $45 million in state funding under a spending bill that cleared the state legislature late Tuesday.
The bill, which is now headed to Gov. Ned Lamont for his signature, increases the amount of funding the state is willing to spend on the renovation project, from $80 million to $125 million <-
Why would they go with 30 year bonding. I'd be fine to wait 10 years before the new on-campus stadium is built.They are still paying off the stadium in Hartford there is zero chance they build a new stadium on campus at this point
Left pocket to right pocket, merely proceduralWhy would they go with 30 year bonding. I'd be fine to wait 10 years before the new on-campus stadium is built.
For what it's worth, Connecticut pays 2.7 million a year to the state to use Rentschler Field six times a year.
Except that at $2.7 million expense makes the athletic department financials look worse. If we agree that it is a net nothing, why not eliminate it and make the athletic department financials look $2.7 million better?Left pocket to right pocket, merely procedural
see CT lawmakers doling out millions in unspent federal funds (courant.com)leftover federal funds were burning a hole in the legislators' pockets so they released it for Gampel, new $625MM for UConn 2000 funding, etc.
Someone with $100,000,000. Couldn’t $100,000,000 almost build a new football stadium?Who pays for this?
Almost? I hope so.Someone with $100,000,000. Couldn’t $100,000,000 almost build a new football stadium?
Someone with $100,000,000. Couldn’t $100,000,000 almost build a new football stadium?
Almost? I hope so.
That's crazy.Florida Board of Governors approves plan for USF's $340 million stadium
The approved stadium will include 35,000 seats and host USF's football and women’s lacrosse teams.www.wusf.org
That’s reality…That's crazy.
That's what The Rent cost over 20 years ago. With mostly bench seats.Someone with $100,000,000. Couldn’t $100,000,000 almost build a new football stadium?