JordyG
Stake in my pocket, Vlad to see you
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2016
- Messages
- 13,091
- Reaction Score
- 54,741
Hey, they all can't be Monet's. Some are just going to be Pollack's.The first half adds a whole new meaning to the expression, "winning ugly"![]()
Hey, they all can't be Monet's. Some are just going to be Pollack's.The first half adds a whole new meaning to the expression, "winning ugly"![]()
The first half adds a whole new meaning to the expression, "winning ugly"![]()
But a "W" is a "W" - ugly or not.
Or some are going to look like my 1 year old nephew's portraits.The first half adds a whole new meaning to the expression, "winning ugly"![]()
FirsPheesa is the only consistent scorer on the floor, so why not?[/QUO
First of all. Phees's strength is not handling the ball in the open floor, right now. Second , why even put her in that position when Gabby already has 3 fouls. Third, sounds like Geno was trying to prove a point.Pheesa is the only consistent scorer on the floor, so why not?
Keep a happy thoughtThis game is far from over.
30 pts up just like that

I'm a big fan of ImpressionistsHey, they all can't be Monet's. Some are just going to be Pollack's.
Me too. It's the Abstract Expressionists and the Modernists that fry my brain. Lou's 4th take away of the game.I'm a big fan of Impressionists