cockhrnleghrn
Crowing rooster
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
- Messages
- 4,466
- Reaction Score
- 8,410
Congratulations on the passing and shooting clinic.
Gabby also had 5 asts, but Wilson had 16 reb and 6 blks
I like this AP statement:I believe both Gabby & Wilson each had 14 pts & 14 rebounds, and Wilson played more minutes. Now you tell me who should be the NPOY?
Omg the announcing was awful. Didn’t call the game, obviously biased and while I love Lobo, I feel like she tries so much to be unbiased that she doesn’t always call it like she should. Does anyone else agree?
Don't know if it was just the home whistle, but seems to be called for at most 1 of every 3 fouls she commits, and her defender gets called for 3 fouls for everyone that is actually committedI would give Wilson 1 block maybe 2 but the rest were clearly fouls. Damn that girl gets all the calls.
Yup and Lou had more fouls tonight than we’ve seen all season. Now we’re they all fouls? Not really...She did have 6 blocks but on at least 3 she fouled the shooter and the refs "missed" it.
I would give Wilson 1 block maybe 2 but the rest were clearly fouls. Damn that girl gets all the calls.
How many of those rebounds were her own missed shots?Wilson was 4-18 from the floor! Whut? I knew I saw her miss a bunch of shots, but holy cow. If not for FTs....
edited--she did have 16 rebounds and 6 blocks
Dee Kantner is really the only decent referee in the women's game. She is human and makes mistakes, but she is legit relative to others I have seen.
And yet as I always say, any sufficiently good enough team overcomes such obstacles. Adjusts to how the calls are going to go, and moves on. To me whether the refereeing was good, bad, or atrocious is irrelevant. Were you good enough to beat the team despite the crowd, the atmosphere, lack of your point guard in the second half, center on the bench, second center playing no so good, bad refs, bad hair, bad wifi. So what? Yesyesyesyesyes. This is UConn.Glad we are not the only people feel the refs suck tonight...
+10.UCONN just had a 34 point lead on the defending National Champions and although they got very little from Z and Dangerfield offensively, they won the game by more than 20 points. Still people are finding little things to whine and complain about. That's too bad. I believe if someone had told BY'ers before the game that UCONN would win by more than 20 points most would have said yes, we will take that. Well, they won by that much and still the complaints continue. I'm a UCONN fan but, after a game like tonight, I have nothing but good things to say. I wish we had a team in St. Louis that was in the top 50. Just saying.
Baloney. She is anti-UConn? Really? So if all the calls went UConn's way, she is a good ref? I have seen other schools say exactly the same thing. "She is anti-bla-bla-bla". Well guess what? Individually you fans are all "right". Collectively you are all "wrong", because in that case, she is being consistent. Your only argument is that she is consistently poor. I can accept that. I have a different opinion, however, because I value that kind of consistency in officiating.You have to be kidding. She has been anti UCONN as long as I remember. The team and Geno must cringe ever time they see her on the schedule. She has absolutely no consistency in her calls.
Players presser for SCar:
Agree to disagree... She is pretty anti-UCONN and she is pretty bad.Baloney. She is anti-UConn? Really? So if all the calls went UConn's way, she is a good ref? I have seen other schools say exactly the same thing. "She is anti-bla-bla-bla". Well guess what? Individually you fans are all "right". Collectively you are all "wrong", because in that case, she is being consistent. Your only argument is that she is consistently poor. I can accept that. I have a different opinion, however, because I value that kind of consistency in officiating.
I tried to help but you didn't want to listen