UConn v. University of Rhode Island Rams (Friday 3/26 @3p & Saturday 3/27 Doubleheader starting @1p @ Elliot Ballpark). Updated Times! | Page 8 | The Boneyard

UConn v. University of Rhode Island Rams (Friday 3/26 @3p & Saturday 3/27 Doubleheader starting @1p @ Elliot Ballpark). Updated Times!

Status
Not open for further replies.
We lost too many games during the interregional part of our season to settle for 2 out of 3 against northeastern opponents. We need better starting pitching if we're going to have any chance to get to the NCAAs without needing to win the conference tournament

To that point, I confess that my knowledge of Big East baseball is limited. Is there any team clearly better than us? Or does UConn have a legitimate chance to win the conference tournament?
 
To that point, I confess that my knowledge of Big East baseball is limited. Is there any team clearly better than us? Or does UConn have a legitimate chance to win the conference tournament?

UConn has been favored by most media who follow college baseball to win the Conference this year. They also were #1 in pre-season poll voted on by the coaches (Creighton was #2).

Where teams stand currently:
If they don’t clean up the little things that have been tripping them up it will be closer than it should be.
 
To that point, I confess that my knowledge of Big East baseball is limited. Is there any team clearly better than us? Or does UConn have a legitimate chance to win the conference tournament?

We are probably the best team in the conference. But in baseball, even more than in basketball, pinning your hopes to a conference tournament sucks because the best team loses a higher percentage of baseball games.
 
UConn has been favored by most media who follow college baseball to win the Conference this year. They also were #1 in pre-season poll voted on by the coaches (Creighton was #2).

Where teams stand currently:
If they don’t clean up the little things that have been tripping them up it will be closer than it should be.
Maybe, but at some point you have to ask yourself if this team, collectively, and not to be harsh, is a bunch of losers. It's barely statistically possible to be 9-12 when you're outhitting your opponents over that time .270 to .226. You can't be 9-12 when every hitter who comes up is likely to get almost one more hit every 20 at bats than your opponent. But this team finds all sorts of ways to lose. That goes from the creative ways, like allowing key steals of home and having the same runner thrown out at home 3 times in a game and a half, to the recurring ways, like being the worst team I've ever seen at moving runners from 2d to 3rd with no one out.

I'm sure we'll win more games when we lose now that we're only playing conference and regional opponents, but it's hard for me to believe that this is a team that will transform itself to play winning baseball such that we're a threat to get out of the first weekend of the NCAAs.
 
Very harsh to refer to them as a "bunch of losers". They lost a lot of close games to very good teams. A break here or there and they could have been 10-4 instead of 4-10. All those games were away. They could easily have gone 2-2 or 3-1 against Texas Tech the #7 team in the country at their park. Yes they need to get their starting rotation straightened out, but to give up on them this early is disgraceful and insulting. If they make the NCAA's as a 3 or 4 seed, I'm not sure many coaches are going to be happy to see them in the first round.
 
Very harsh to refer to them as a "bunch of losers". They lost a lot of close games to very good teams. A break here or there and they could have been 10-4 instead of 4-10. All those games were away. They could easily have gone 2-2 or 3-1 against Texas Tech the #7 team in the country at their park.

I just read a D1 Baseball blurb about Texas Tech:

“Texas Tech has been on quite a tear over the past month. The Red Raiders have won 19 of their last 20 games, and their surge continued over the weekend at home against South Florida. Tech outscored South Florida 31-10 in the three games, and lefthanded pitcher Patrick Monteverde was terrific again, striking out nine with no walks in seven shutout innings.”

They are up to #4 in both D1Baseball & Baseball America Top 25 polls.
 
.-.
Very harsh to refer to them as a "bunch of losers". They lost a lot of close games to very good teams. A break here or there and they could have been 10-4 instead of 4-10. All those games were away. They could easily have gone 2-2 or 3-1 against Texas Tech the #7 team in the country at their park. Yes they need to get their starting rotation straightened out, but to give up on them this early is disgraceful and insulting. If they make the NCAA's as a 3 or 4 seed, I'm not sure many coaches are going to be happy to see them in the first round.

The language is harsh but I don't know a better way to say it. Look, in any sport, sometimes the team is greater than the sum of its parts and sometimes the team is worse than the sum of its parts. When the team is worse than the sum of its parts, use whatever language you want but it's disappointing and it reflects on whether team is made up of players who know how to make winning plays or players who don't. When you're out hitting your opponents over 20 games by as much as we are, and you're struggling to get up to .500, it does reflect on folks. Not on whether they're great young men, but whether they know how to use their talent to win athletic contests.
 
I just read a D1 Baseball blurb about Texas Tech:

“Texas Tech has been on quite a tear over the past month. The Red Raiders have won 19 of their last 20 games, and their surge continued over the weekend at home against South Florida. Tech outscored South Florida 31-10 in the three games, and lefthanded pitcher Patrick Monteverde was terrific again, striking out nine with no walks in seven shutout innings.”

They are up to #4 in both D1Baseball & Baseball America Top 25 polls.

But that's the point, isn't it. If TTU clubbed us by 21 runs over 3 games, you don't learn about whether your team can or can't gut out a win. All you learn is that the other team is way better than you. When you lose games because you can't handle a steal of home, or make a proper slide with the game on the line, or moving a runner to third with no one out, what you're learning isn't that you don't have the talent to win. It's that you do have the talent to win but aren't getting it done.

But I'll leave it be. Someone forgot to send me the rules that the baseball team wasn't to be subject to the same kind of analysis and expectations that the football and basketball teams are. And that if you are harshly criticizing a team, that means you're "giving up on them." My bad.
 
When was it acceptable to call student-athletes "losers" on the football and basketball teams?? It's not acceptable at all and it was "your bad."
 
When was it acceptable to call student-athletes "losers" on the football and basketball teams?? It's not acceptable at all and it was "your bad."
I named no player. I called no individual a name. My post would not have been out of place at all on other boards. The team is playing below its talent level. When the basketball or football teams play below their levels (not that the football team can any more), the players and the teams get destroyed in the Boneyard. Sorry if you missed that all, but it's there. So do I feel a need to give a non-facetious apology? No. This team has the talent to have a much better record than they have to date. If your view is that we're all great but yet we keep losomh but there's nothing wrong with that -- well, I don't agree.
 
Last edited:
The UConn baseball team to date has played the 10th strongest schedule, according to the Warren Nolan website.
 
.-.
I named no player. I called no individual a name. My post would not have been out of place at all on other boards. The team is playing below its talent level. When the basketball or football teams play below their levels (not that the football team can any more), the players and the teams get destroyed in the Boneyard. Sorry if you missed that all, but it's there. So do I feel a need to give a non-factious apology? No. This team has the talent to have a much better record than they have to date. If your view is that we're all great but yet we keep lose but there's nothing wrong with that -- well, I don't agree.
Your point on lack of execution is correct. To me, it isn't that simple. Some guys just haven't performed as in the past- Wang, Dunlop, Chris Winkel. Some guys haven't been consistent- Reggie, Kyler. I look at the early season as a time to work out the wrinkles and then get start to smooth them out over the conference season and have them worked out by tournament time. There is time for this team and I still think it is more than capable of putting together a run. I would rather see that run during the Big East Tournament and NCAA Tournament than in March or April.

If you ask me, Texas Tech won't want to see us again in the NCAA tournament.
 



-> Player of the Week - Erik Stock, UConn, Jr., Utility (Virginia Beach, Va.)

Connecticut junior Erik Stock batted .471 (8-for-17) in a 3-1 week for the Huskies which included a 2-1 series victory over Rhode Island and a midweek win over Central Connecticut State. Stock led the league with eight hits last week and was in the top four in batting average, slugging percentage, on-base percentage, runs, runs batted in and doubles. He was second RBI with five. Stock played the outfield in all four games for UConn last week and did not commit an error but made 10 putouts. He had a multi-hit game in all four, crossing the plate a total of four times with a double and a triple. He also stole three bases. His slugging for the week was .706, his on-base percentage was .500. <-

-> Honor Roll: Patrick Gallagher, UConn, Fr., RHP
Second-year freshman starter Gallagher had a career outing in a 2-0 win for UConn over Central Connecticut. Gallagher pitched five scoreless innings with a career-high nine strikeouts. He allowed just one walk and three hits. <-
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,470
Messages
4,576,342
Members
10,485
Latest member
Cman


Top Bottom