UCONN to new Big East | Page 2 | The Boneyard

UCONN to new Big East

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,393
Reaction Score
69,717
I sure hope women's basketball wouldn't go this route. UConn would be left with ~9 nonconference games.

 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,826
Reaction Score
45,807
any thoughts on how this might effect UConn WBB recruiting? Good/Bad/No Change
 
Joined
Apr 23, 2012
Messages
157
Reaction Score
436
If I'm not mistaken, Fox owns the Big East TV rights but is sub-leasing them to CBS/CBSSN.

Some questions to keep in mind, even if er can't know the answers yet:

--What would UConn share of the Fox/CBS package bring in?

--Would ESPN try to keep UConn in the AAC by cutting UConn a bettter deal and would the AAC be okay with that?

--Would there be a better chance of keeping the SNY coverage in the AAC (if ESPN wants to cut UConn a better deal) or in the BE?

--Does everyone on the Boneyard get CBSSN? If not, how do the subscription prices compare with those for ESPN+
 

Plebe

La verdad no peca pero incomoda
Joined
Feb 22, 2016
Messages
19,393
Reaction Score
69,717
Dana O'Neil, formerly of ESPN and now with The Athletic, has a positive take (written from the perspective of men's basketball):


For UConn, this is the ultimate rescue operation, the offer saving the university from itself. Snookered by the lure of a Fiesta Bowl bid in 2011, the basketball-proud institution decided to become a football school — except not a very good one — and found itself standing on the fault line of the conference realignment tectonic plate. The highs of that bowl-bid season have slowly eroded into one low followed by another, the school tethered to a stadium that sits 25 miles from campus and nearly empty on most fall Saturdays. In the meantime, the basketball program, built on storied rivalries with Georgetown and Villanova, was pushed out of its natural fit and into forced marriages with the likes of Tulsa, Houston and Tulane. Not surprisingly, it hasn’t gone well.​
 

cockhrnleghrn

Crowing rooster
Joined
Jan 27, 2014
Messages
4,395
Reaction Score
8,264
Is the BE conf really that much of an improvement to AAC in WBB? A little bit, maybe, but not a lot.
IMO, not really; it is a bit of an improvement in MBB, though. The only improvement, conference-wise, is for WBB to be in P5. The same goes for football. I don't see an overall benefit for you guys to move from the AAC to the NBE.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2014
Messages
9,874
Reaction Score
29,425
--Does everyone on the Boneyard get CBSSN? If not, how do the subscription prices compare with those for ESPN+
I get CBSSN as part of my cable package with Cox (Phoenix). I'm sure they're charging me something for it, buried in the package rate. I have a package that includes all kinds of sports channels (local & national PAC-12, FS1, FS AZ, NBA, MLB, NFL channels, etc). I'm sure it's nowhere near $5.00/mo just for CBSSN.
 

MSGRET

MSG, US Army Retired
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
6,422
Reaction Score
35,790
I believe for the MBB it will allow for a lot more games to be televised on SNY and the WBB team will be able to get more Nationally televised games on both FOX and CBS. ESPN will be very upset with the loss of UConn, but they hurt themselves by first not pushing for UConn when the Big East originally broke up and then basically telling UConn the heck with you with this new TV deal. It should also help with both recruiting and travel.
 
Last edited:

diggerfoot

Humanity Hiker
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
1,552
Reaction Score
8,707
IMO, not really; it is a bit of an improvement in MBB, though. The only improvement, conference-wise, is for WBB to be in P5. The same goes for football. I don't see an overall benefit for you guys to move from the AAC to the NBE.
Did you skip over Plebe's comparison chart (easy to do once these threads get long). There is a huge difference between the two in WBB: Mean Massey for AAC = 143; Mean NBE = 71. Huge! And UConn would in turn being pulling up the NBE even higher, rather than its Herculean effort of pulling up the AAC.

On edit: I don't know if this would be much of a factor or not, we do fairly well with OOC scheduling already, but it's got to be more appealing to a good OOC school scheduling and losing to us with what our rating will be in the NBE over the AAC.
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2016
Messages
12,826
Reaction Score
45,807
one positive.........................I'll certainly be there if and when UConn comes to play at Seton Hall in South Orange NJ.............although perhaps that game will be moved to a larger venue..............
 

DefenseBB

Snark is always appreciated!
Joined
Nov 10, 2016
Messages
7,914
Reaction Score
28,741
First and foremost any P5 Conference could care less if the Football team is any good. They care SOLELY about the television markets that the school plays in. Hence Rutgers (with as an atrocious FBB program there’s is) getting a bid from the Big10 to capture the NY media market.
Second, to field a competitive P5 football team, you need 40-50% of the talent in your backyard (the New England/NY State/Long Island and frankly THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN as youth football in our region and passion for youth football is horrendous. Programs cannot recruit 85 players nationally and it is cost prohibitive.
Third, the state budget will not tolerate more heavy losses by the Athletic Department whose loss leader is Football.
Fourth, WCBB is a minor consideration at best in this decision as Conference revenue is non-existent in WCBB. UConn’s best play is to keep the SNY contract to help with the budget (#3 above)
Fifth, schools like Villanova, Gonzaga, St.Mary’s do well focusing on basketball and UConn could do just as well especially considering our pedigree in hoops.
The reality is no New England school could ever draw enough or create enough revenue from sales to support a D1 football team. We have 3 pro teams alone that occupy our consciousness. Add in 3 pro basketball teams, 4 pro hockey teams and 3 pro baseball teams and our time is completely consumed. Don’t believe me, listen to any Boston or NY Sports show, then go down south and tune in. Huge difference in focus. So while I absolutely respect the passion @UConnNick shows and see his perspective on his logic, it blinds him to the reality that is New England regarding college football. Humbly submitted.
 

TheFarmFan

Stanford Fan, Huskies Admirer
Joined
Nov 28, 2018
Messages
1,962
Reaction Score
13,941
Not sure if this has been discussed here or before, but this article from the Courant earlier this year indicated that, in fact, football was not helping UConn and is not, in fact, a "revenue" sport. Or, at least, it's much more a deficit sport than a revenue sport, to the tune of an $8.7m deficit in 2018 alone. That's staggering. The second biggest loser? The other supposed "revenue" sport, men's basketball, at $5m. WBB came in third at a $3m deficit. (But at least they win championships!)

As it is, at most two of the AAC schools are in a bus-drive distance of UConn (Temple and Navy), so away games mean hauling every single athlete on an airplane, and presumably it also requires extra nights at hotels. So I wonder if assumptions about the importance of "revenue sports" are faulty, at least at UConn? My sense is that the costs associated with football are enormous for any school, given the number of players, the costs of travel, the maintenance of stadiums, and the very small number of home games (seriously, think about this: you need a very costly football stadium for 6-7 total games per year, and the best you can do with it the rest of the year is soccer, maybe). My views on this may be idiosyncratic for a hard-core college sports fan, but I also think football is a long-term loser, given CTE and the costs associated with staffing and supporting the sport.

This may hurt UConn in the short term, but I do think it's the long-term road to sustainability, because college athletics across the board are not sustainable as presently configured. Right now most of college sports are supported by a combination of huge university subsidies and bloated media rights package, neither of which will last for much longer. University subsidies will not be sustainable as costs in higher ed continue to rise and the appetite for $70k costs of attendance continues to wane and universities realize they need to do serious belt-tightening across the board. And media revenue is built on a decaying foundation of pre-cord-cutting bloated $100+ per month cable packages that generated insane revenues for ESPN and the other sports networks and that, in turn, led to huge media rights packages. Folks are cutting cords right and left, and millennials are not going to pay $100 per month just to stream sports. Trust me, I am one, and Sling at $30 per month is more than enough for me, thankyouverymuch. I am almost certain the next round of media deals will be smaller than the current ones, because they're just not sustainable.
 

UConnNick

from Vince Lombardi's home town
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
5,076
Reaction Score
14,074
I sure hope women's basketball wouldn't go this route. UConn would be left with ~9 nonconference games.



It likely will. Why would they do women's BB differently?
 
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
21,670
Reaction Score
52,471
First and foremost any P5 Conference could care less if the Football team is any good. They care SOLELY about the television markets that the school plays in.

No.

Of course it is a range of factors. Otherwise, Pitt, Syracuse, & WVa never would've been invited.
 

triaddukefan

Tobacco Road Gastronomer
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
19,467
Reaction Score
59,500
UConn's best bet for football might be the CAA (Colonial Athletic Association).

I said the same a few months ago.

They could join the CAA for football only..old Yankee conference foes like New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Maine, plus nearby schools like Albany and Stonybrook.

Throw out the record books when the Huskies and the Wildcats, Rams, or Black Bears meet up in East Hartford in front of friends and family.
 

UConnNick

from Vince Lombardi's home town
Joined
Sep 17, 2011
Messages
5,076
Reaction Score
14,074
IMO, not really; it is a bit of an improvement in MBB, though. The only improvement, conference-wise, is for WBB to be in P5. The same goes for football. I don't see an overall benefit for you guys to move from the AAC to the NBE.

This past season the AAC was better than the NBE, and that gap will inevitably widen in future years. The AAC will have far more money than the NBE to continue improvement in BB. Houston, UCF, Cincinnati, and now Memphis are emerging as powers in BB, and Wichita State should be much improved.

IMHO, I think the UConn administration is pissed about the SNY deal getting axed in the new AAC media deal, but I also think they're running scared, believing the overall competition in football and men's BB in the AAC is too much to ever overcome on a restricted AD budget.
 

oldude

bamboo lover
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
16,881
Reaction Score
149,584
I’ve been advocating for this move for several years now. UConn, as well as the state of CT, cannot continue to absorb the red ink of trying to run a big time college football program in the long shot hope that some P5 conference will eventually accept them.

UConn WBB will be just fine, cutting their travel budget substantially, while renewing traditional rivalries. Villanova MBB has thrived in the BE. I expect the same for UConn WBB.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
2,605
Reaction Score
11,532
I think it's more than a little bit:

Massey:
43 UCF16 Marquette
65 Cincinnati23 DePaul
96 South Florida56 Butler
117 Houston57 Georgetown
145 Tulane66 Villanova
157 Temple72 Creighton
170 Tulsa76 St. John's
179 East Carolina85 Providence
196 SMU102 Seton Hall
197 Wichita St155 Xavier
206 Memphis
Mean: 143Mean: 71
Lol. Love it when facts get in the way
 

Online statistics

Members online
584
Guests online
4,988
Total visitors
5,572

Forum statistics

Threads
157,111
Messages
4,083,537
Members
9,980
Latest member
Texasfan01


Top Bottom