All of our arguments have some merit. But the reality is various entities are trying to tilt the equations towards themselves while realizing they have to rely on others. And since no one knows the future with absolute certainty a good part of the decision making process is about probabilities for success. Models are changing constantly.
I agree totally, I just lean toward the status quo. With a growing student debt problem, the P5 school presidents would have a hard time standing in front of Congress justifying their non-profit status and ever increasing tuition, against what have been obvious revenue grabs in moving first to BCS and now to P5, and then destroying what's great about the NCAAT.
I'm anything but antitrust expert, but I've seen enough politicians grandstand to believe that the tipping point would be eliminating 200+/- schools from the tournament for an obvious money grab. How else would they justify shutting out schools that clearly deserve to play in the tournament in favor of a winless BCU team.
I do agree that if the P5 thought they could get away with it, and make more money, they would probably try.
No matter where anyone stands on the issue, I've now worked in a winless BCU team into consecutive posts. That should create some cohesion here.