I didn't even think of that strategy until after the fact. In retrospect, Kemba may have been a good choice for the 2011 team member.The intrigue in "Reverse Sheep" will be: did people pick the obvious answer, assuming that nobody else would pick the obvious answer to avoid matching?
And if everyone else thinks that way, it's better to pick the more obscure answer. But if everyone thinks that way, then the obvious answer is better.
It's an endless loop.
I didn't even think of that strategy until after the fact. In retrospect, Kemba may have been a good choice for the 2011 team member.
The intrigue in "Reverse Sheep" will be: did people pick the obvious answer, assuming that nobody else would pick the obvious answer to avoid matching?
And if everyone else thinks that way, it's better to pick the more obscure answer. But if everyone thinks that way, then the obvious answer is better.
It's an endless loop.
I was reviewing for mistakes and realized that I incorrectly gave @RayIsTheGOAT and @breezy a point each when they should've had zero for their answers. Sorry guys, but I giveth and I taketh away. Good luck in the second half everyone!!!George Washington (-6) : Matrim55, Tenspro2002, Minicoop69, navery12, Deepster, david
Minnesota (-3) : CTBasketball, Giscombe12, bcisco
Stanford (-2) : jfuchs91, KemBuckets21
Dayton (-1) : RayIsTheGOAT
West Virginia (-1) : breezy (just made the cut)
Incorrect Answers:
BYU (0) : partyATkemba
UNC (0) : DaveHuskiesFan (runner-up in 2011)
SMU (0) :Cassius Klaiber, KingOPancakes (they were the runner-up 2014)
Xavier (0) : Chin Diesel
Tennessee (0) : mauconnfan
Kentucky (0) : KOisKing
I'm also ashamed of myself, but just slightly less so.I'm ashamed of myself.
I have this game but didn't choose it. That probably means 10 others chose the same one.
Question #14:
Name a videogame that the UConn brand appeared in.
This was a weird one with lots of varied answers so it should be interesting.
I'm ashamed of myself.
I'm also ashamed of myself, but just slightly less so.
I think it depends on the number of possible choices.
If the number of possible choices is low, it's probably better to go with the cheeky/obvious answer since there's a good chance people will match your less-obvious answer anyway.
If the number of possible choices is high, it's probably better to go with an obscure answer. In this scenario, there's a higher probability of someone else thinking cheekily and matching your obvious answer than of someone else matching your obscure answer.
The psychology for "Reverse Sheep" is a lot more complex than for "Sheep". This should be interesting.
Actually, the "Sheep" psychology is pretty well understood, and the phenomenon even has a name: the Keynesian Beauty Contest.
Agreed on all counts. In fact, I am using google forms. I'd be faster if I were any good with them.Hey Mano, I love this game. We could do this about almost everything, but the analyzing of data must suck. I suggest google forms possibly. It would be a little easier to analyze. Just a thought.
I guess I mean having us type in the form instead of you. There is a add on called flubaroo that can score things for you.Agreed on all counts. In fact, I am using google forms. I'd be faster if I were any good with them.