- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 2,003
- Reaction Score
- 11,015
one starWhat is the cut-off between 4 and 5 star?
one starWhat is the cut-off between 4 and 5 star?
.5 stars.What is the cut-off between 4 and 5 star?
The word "otherwise" is doing a lot of work hereThis Hurley GOAT stuff still cracks me up. He's had two consecutive championship seasons with an otherwise unspectacular tournament record. Did he ever get past the first round before 2023?
Do I think he's capable of continued success at UConn, absolutely. HOF - yes, absolutely. JC level success, yep.
But get back to me in ten years with this goat talk.
The word "otherwise" is doing a lot of work here
It is not correct, you win 6 games to win a national championshipCorrect. His wiki page has his tournament record as 14-4. The 14 is seven wins in '23 and seven wins in '24. If this is correct, he never won a tournament game until '23.
Yikes, you should probably learn how many games it takes to win the tournament before you decide to post in a thread about an otherwise lack of success in the tournament.Correct. His wiki page has his tournament record as 14-4. The 14 is seven wins in '23 and seven wins in '24. If this is correct, he never won a tournament game until '23.
Yikes, you should probably learn how many games it takes to win the tournament before you decide to post in a thread about an otherwise lack of success in the tournament.
Correct - 2003 commit is the earliest shown in their top 25. That's Charlie Villanueva.As Donyell and RIP are also missing, I'm thinking the starting point must be around 2000 or so.
Why are we doing this after a night when Auriemmia became the GOAT and literally had a goat there?!?!?Changes nothing. Two wins with four losses outside of '23 and '24, along with not qualifying for the tournament more often than not isn't even close to GOAT level coaching.
At least you learned he's won tournament games outside of the past two seasons and you learned how many games it takes to win the tournament.Changes nothing. Two wins with four losses outside of '23 and '24, along with not qualifying for the tournament more often than not isn't even close to GOAT level coaching.
As Geno said it's an entirely different sport. He can lay claim to best women's college basketball coach ever.Why are we doing this after a night when Auriemmia became the GOAT and literally had a goat there?!?!?
New generation GOAT is fair for now. Certainly not in overall GOAT conversation. 3 peat does put him firmly in it though.This Hurley GOAT stuff still cracks me up. He's had two consecutive championship seasons with an otherwise unspectacular tournament record. Did he ever get past the first round before 2023?
Do I think he's capable of continued success at UConn, absolutely. HOF - yes, absolutely. JC level success, yep.
But get back to me in ten years with this goat talk.
NCAA says otherwise. Most college basketball wins of all time, different sport or not.As Geno said it's an entirely different sport. He can lay claim to best women's college basketball coach ever.
At least you learned he's won tournament games outside of the past two seasons and you learned how many games it takes to win the tournament.
Can we outlaw the words 3 Peat here or at least make it a fine? It’s destructive Mojo.New generation GOAT is fair for now. Certainly not in overall GOAT conversation. 3 peat does put him firmly in it though.
Sarcasm? My argument?You just can't pull off sarcasm, especially when your argument is stupid. Adding two wins to Hurley's record changes nothing as far as the GOAT argument is concerned.
New generation GOAT is fair for now. Certainly not in overall GOAT conversation. 3 peat does put him firmly in it though.
Sarcasm? My argument?
Keep digging.
I made no Hurley is the greatest of all-time or new greatest of all-time argument. I used no sarcasm. You came into the thread to laugh at someone calling him the next generation GOAT. You then asked if Hurley has ever won a tournament game outside of the two national championships. You looked up his win total in NCAA tournaments and then said he's never won another NCAA tournament game outside of his two national championships. All I did was point out that you dunked on yourself.I was being generous. Your argument is just plain dumb. I've admitted many times that I know very little about basketball, so I tend to rely on facts.
I also know there is no person "ignored" by more registered users, than you. I peaked at four.
I made no Hurley is the greatest of all-time or new greatest of all-time argument. I used no sarcasm. You came into the thread to laugh at someone calling him the next generation GOAT. You then asked if Hurley has ever won a tournament game outside of the two national championships. You looked up his win total in NCAA tournaments and then said he's never won another NCAA tournament game outside of his two national championships. All I did was point out that you dunked on yourself.
We all know you know nothing about basketball and you're showing off you don't know what facts are either.
Congrats on your ignore count, remarkable achievement.
Again I made no argument about GOAT, New GOAT.You are choosing to die on a hill about two wins over ~15 year, but agree about my Hurley/GOAT position. That pretty much defines 'silly argument.' It's one step dumber than grammar police.
Take your pissing matches to a DM and stop turning threads into a your own bitchy little conversations.
You should really stop before you make a fool of yourself. Donovan was 35 and 20 at Marshall with no tournament appearances.Yikes, you should probably learn how many games it takes to win the tournament before you decide to post in a thread about an otherwise lack of success in the tournament.
Again I made no argument about GOAT, New GOAT.
I just pointed out the fact that Hurley has won tournament games outside of his back to back.
You said you tend to rely on facts.
What?You should really stop before you make a fool of yourself. Donovan was 35 and 20 at Marshall with no tournament appearances.
Cherry picked facts apparently using only one data point as a criteria. Your methodology is deeply flawed.I was being generous. Your argument is just plain dumb. I've admitted many times that I know very little about basketball, so I tend to rely on facts.
The rain it raineth on the justWhat?
Umbrellas are designed to keep people from getting wet.
Cherry picked facts apparently using only one data point as a criteria. Your methodology is deeply flawed.