So you work at the car wash? I always thought that was you Chief... nice eyebrows btw... have an A1A day with Andre and the UConn bishes!I am plugged in.
You got me that time Mets. You’ve cut
it to 387-2.
It’s hilarious though watching y’all
follow her lead how she is resposible for nothing.
There's not evidence that AD Dave is going anywhere. I don't know what criteria they will use for the next pres but I doubt athletic connections will be one of them. We'll see.The thing that bothers me about the current situation is that with a new president coming in and perhaps a new AD as a result, UConn will then be led, once again, by people without the necessary cultivated connections to give the Huskies a shot at a P5 berth.
There's not evidence that AC Dave is going anywhere. I don't know what criteria they will use for the next pres but I doubt athletic connections will be one of them. We'll see.
That’s not what I’m hearing. There’s more optimism in Tempe after a bumpy start to his regime. Look for a competitive team with a few upsets over the better Pac12 teams. It’s more likely that Edwards will surprise his naysayers.Herm Edwards (will) destroy what's left of their FB program.
Yeah that's right, it's all the new UConn President's fault. Warde (Nero) Manuel was just an innocent bystander following her lead.You are right on some things but you couldn’t be more wrong about the ACC.
This. I'm not going to sit here and pretend to know the actual statistics, but I always find it amusing how people here trash SH because of our athletic situation while ignoring how much she elevated the University as a whole. Does our current situation look dire athletically, sure. However, that's not her number one priority. I know we want it to be, and that this is a sports message board, but many of you just ignore all the good she's done for this University. Losing her will be a big loss and I hope we find someone who will continue to move this University on a positive direction. Our state needs it more then ever right now.There's not evidence that AD Dave is going anywhere. I don't know what criteria they will use for the next pres but I doubt athletic connections will be one of them. We'll see.

Nope, no numbers. Just want to point out that message has not gotten through or been widely disseminated. The perception is that the initial rise in external R&D funding has not been sustained. That UConn is no closer to AAU membership than before. Are perceptions wrong?Ok, all you SH haters can throw your numbers at me and tell me I'm wrong....![]()
I am plugged in.
You think it’s easy? I spoke to SH on the subject. AAU membership (like a sorority) is by invitation only. There are only 62 schools in the club. And while many are looking to be invited, since 2002 only two schools have been admitted into the AAU. Just two!. Boston University in 2010 and Georgia Tech in 2012. That’s it. Nobody else. In fact during that same timeframe Nebraska was kicked out in 2011 and Syracuse withdrew in 2011 when it realized it no longer met the criteria and wanted to avoid the “Nebraska embarrassment”Just want to point out that UConn is no closer to AAU membership than before.
Yeah that's right, it's all the new UConn President's fault. Warde (Nero) Manuel was just an innocent bystander following her lead.
And we are making progress in AAU metrics. It is just a long way from where we were to where we want to be.You think it’s easy? I spoke to SH on the subject. AAU membership (like a sorority) is by invitation only. There are only 62 schools in the club. And while many are looking to be invited, since 2002 only two schools have been admitted into the AAU. Just two!. Boston University in 2010 and Georgia Tech in 2012. That’s it. Nobody else. In fact during that same timeframe Nebraska was kicked out in 2011 and Syracuse withdrew in 2011 when it realized it no longer met the criteria and wanted to avoid the “Nebraska embarrassment”
At the risk of mixing metaphors, we were adrift in the AAU desert before Susan Herbst came on board. What she’s done to improve our chances has been extraordinary, and however elusive the invitation may be, the effort will go on.
I think you are at the point, where you just acknowledge your Casual Fandom, and let Chief dissect the complexities of CR. Enjoy the summer. ChiefIt’s getting weird Chief.
Yet, the AD must do the work on the ground. It was Jurich's hard working efforts that positioned Louisville's admission the ACC. I have to agree with huskyrob1 here.Conference Realignment is a Presidents’ club game, not the AD’s. Chief understand that’s a common misperception but the Presidents not the AD’s drive the realignment bus.
#ChiefCertified
That's why I knew that Suzie and her hair and make-up dog and pony show was going to bomb in the Big12 presentation with the good-old boys watching. What doesn't fit and Why?????Conference Realignment is a Presidents’ club game, not the AD’s. Chief understand that’s a common misperception but the Presidents not the AD’s drive the realignment bus.
#ChiefCertified
I know it was so frustrating when all the other candidates but us got accepted to Big 12!That's why I knew that Suzie and her hair and make-up dog and pony show was going to bomb in the Big12 presentation with the good-old boys watching. What doesn't fit and Why?????

Of course it is not easy. There are benchmarks. But the general perception is that UConn's dashboard needles have barely moved relative to those benchmarks. You are apparently inferring that they have. OK, please share those data with us. I can be convinced and I am sure others can be as well.You think it’s easy? I spoke to SH on the subject. AAU membership (like a sorority) is by invitation only. There are only 62 schools in the club. And while many are looking to be invited, since 2002 only two schools have been admitted into the AAU. Just two!. Boston University in 2010 and Georgia Tech in 2012. That’s it. Nobody else. In fact during that same timeframe Nebraska was kicked out in 2011 and Syracuse withdrew in 2011 when it realized it no longer met the criteria and wanted to avoid the “Nebraska embarrassment”
At the risk of mixing metaphors, we were adrift in the AAU desert before Susan Herbst came on board. What she’s done to improve our chances has been extraordinary, and however elusive the invitation may be, the effort will go on.
If that's so then what specifically, in your opinion, did she do wrong?Conference Realignment is a Presidents’ club game, not the AD’s. Chief understand that’s a common misperception but the Presidents not the AD’s drive the realignment bus.
#ChiefCertified
Are there instances of those satisfying the benchmarks being rejected?
Did not built friendly relationships with other Presidents until late in her tenure.If that's so then what specifically, in your opinion, did she do wrong?
To be fair, she came in without much time to do that, right? That is why I am concerned about yet another regime change. No time to develop those relationships unless the incoming people already have them. Of course, UConn seems to be G5 in academics too so the chances of getting a really big name seem slim.Did not built friendly relationships with other Presidents until late in her tenure.
They have every internal politically correct group and political connected type represented on that silly 44 person search committee plus an external national vendor - I wonder if anyone is even thinking conference realignment?To be fair, she came in without much time to do that, right? That is why I am concerned about yet another regime change. No time to develop those relationships unless the incoming people already have them. Of course, UConn seems to be G5 in academics too so the chances of getting a really big name seem slim.
Of course it is not easy. There are benchmarks. But the general perception is that UConn's dashboard needles have barely moved relative to those benchmarks. You are apparently inferring that they have. OK, please share those data with us. I can be convinced and I am sure others can be as well.
You also inferred that there is a clique-sh aspect to membership. Is that really true? Are there instances of those satisfying the benchmarks being rejected? Or, conversely, those not meeting the benchmarks being accepted? I rather doubt that.
Not to worry, the benchmarks aren't in the box anyway. Get those things lying flat for more than a year or two and then we can have a discussion about being on the outside looking in."Upstater," where are you? I believe you have, in previous posts, suggested that the AAU has no wish to increase the denominator while the numerator (research grants) is languishing.
There's not evidence that AD Dave is going anywhere. I don't know what criteria they will use for the next pres but I doubt athletic connections will be one of them. We'll see.
Proof?He’s been sniffing around for other jobs ever since he got here.