August_West
Conscience do cost
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 51,436
- Reaction Score
- 90,551
I'm not sure I would place too much weight in that. While it does sound nice (and winning it all five times is no small feat) this is to some extent rewarding us for the years we didn't get there.
Were we better off than Duke in 1990? Were we better off than Florida (1994), Mississippi State (1996), UNC (1998) or Mason (2006) for falling short in seasons we could have made it?
If in any one of those years, if we could somewhat rewrite history and give ourselves one or two more wins before that season ended without a title how many would say "no, I'd rather lose where we did to preserve our final four record"?
While I'm at it, would we have been better off if we lost to Missouri in 2009?
In 1990, yes we were better off than Duke.
UNLV wouldve smoked us. No thanks.
94 and 96 we wouldve won the title and been 14-1 so those hurt

