UConn is a Blue Blood | Page 14 | The Boneyard

UConn is a Blue Blood

Status
Not open for further replies.
mauconnfan said:
Wow Rob Parker is a moron lol!
Expand ...
I have zero issue with anyone saying we're not a "blue blood". The only category where UConn is in the top 10 is NCs. Not appearances, not SS, not EE, not FF, not championship games. Only titles.

The question to ask is: "Why does "blue blood" mean so much to UConn fans?" We already have enough hardware to have proven our worth.

Personally, I think it's really only four teams that merit "blue blood" status: UK, KU, UNC, UCLA. Duke is just about as "new money" as we are as they were meaningless prior to K. But they've only missed one tourney since he got there. They're like the Warren Buffet on the list.

Other than Duke's late entry to the club, I think the criteria for "blue blood" is fairly well denoted: 30+ Sweet Sixteens, 20+ Elite Eights, 15+ Final Fours, 10+ NC games, at least 4 NCs. Only five teams meet that, the true blue bloods and Duke.

For me, Indiana fell out of the club. They squandered their inheritance.

And one other thing... the term is absolutely meaningless in the context of the current college basketball environment.
 
storrsroars said:
I have zero issue with anyone saying we're not a "blue blood". The only category where UConn is in the top 10 is NCs. Not appearances, not SS, not EE, not FF, not championship games. Only titles.

The question to ask is: "Why does "blue blood" mean so much to UConn fans?" We already have enough hardware to have proven our worth.

Personally, I think it's really only four teams that merit "blue blood" status: UK, KU, UNC, UCLA. Duke is just about as "new money" as we are as they were meaningless prior to K. But they've only missed one tourney since he got there. They're like the Warren Buffet on the list.

Other than Duke's late entry to the club, I think the criteria for "blue blood" is fairly well denoted: 30+ Sweet Sixteens, 20+ Elite Eights, 15+ Final Fours, 10+ NC games, at least 4 NCs. Only five teams meet that, the true blue bloods and Duke.

For me, Indiana fell out of the club. They squandered their inheritance.

And one other thing... the term is absolutely meaningless in the context of the current college basketball environment.
Expand ...
Embrace the Nouveau Riche.
 
Another vote for being a Blue Blood from Pat Forde.

In subduing the determined San Diego State, 76–59, on Monday, the championship lineage continues. With a fifth national title under a third coach since 1999, UConn’s utter rampage through the bracket in this NCAA tournament firms up blueblood status. The Huskies separated themselves from the pack this postseason, winning six games by lopsided margins and, in the process, have separated themselves from any other program in the past quarter century.

College sports can be weirdly resistant to rising programs that challenge tradition, but there is no way to ignore or minimize what the Huskies have done. The list of Cadillac programs in the history of the sport must include UConn.

They’ve earned their title mementos. And Connecticut men’s basketball has earned its prominent place on the very short list of the blueblood programs in the sport.

 
HooperScooper said:
Another vote for being a Blue Blood from Pat Forde.

In subduing the determined San Diego State, 76–59, on Monday, the championship lineage continues. With a fifth national title under a third coach since 1999, UConn’s utter rampage through the bracket in this NCAA tournament firms up blueblood status. The Huskies separated themselves from the pack this postseason, winning six games by lopsided margins and, in the process, have separated themselves from any other program in the past quarter century.

College sports can be weirdly resistant to rising programs that challenge tradition, but there is no way to ignore or minimize what the Huskies have done. The list of Cadillac programs in the history of the sport must include UConn.

They’ve earned their title mementos. And Connecticut men’s basketball has earned its prominent place on the very short list of the blueblood programs in the sport.

Expand ...
Blue bloods drive Cadillacs. We're driving Ferraris.
 
storrsroars said:
I have zero issue with anyone saying we're not a "blue blood". The only category where UConn is in the top 10 is NCs. Not appearances, not SS, not EE, not FF, not championship games. Only titles.

The question to ask is: "Why does "blue blood" mean so much to UConn fans?" We already have enough hardware to have proven our worth.

Personally, I think it's really only four teams that merit "blue blood" status: UK, KU, UNC, UCLA. Duke is just about as "new money" as we are as they were meaningless prior to K. But they've only missed one tourney since he got there. They're like the Warren Buffet on the list.

Other than Duke's late entry to the club, I think the criteria for "blue blood" is fairly well denoted: 30+ Sweet Sixteens, 20+ Elite Eights, 15+ Final Fours, 10+ NC games, at least 4 NCs. Only five teams meet that, the true blue bloods and Duke.

For me, Indiana fell out of the club. They squandered their inheritance.

And one other thing... the term is absolutely meaningless in the context of the current college basketball environment.
Expand ...
I loved hearing Bilas say that the " Blue Bloods" are old to college basketball just like the Vanderbilts and Gettys are to American Business.......... He then said UConn is the present and future just like Gates and Musk! (don't quote be verbatim)
 
Something popped into my head that might be cool. The USWNT in soccer adds a star to the crest on their jersey whenever they win a World Cup. I think it would be cool to do something like that on the UConn men's jerseys. I know in the case of USWNT, it also drives additional jersey sales because fans want the newest one, and could do the same for UConn. If not on the jerseys, maybe in the striping on the shorts or something?
 
Waquoit said:
I say 1990.
Expand ...
This.

I keep seeing people say UConn has “only” been a great program for 25 years, but the correct number is 33. They also have Sweet 16s and Elite Eights dating back to the 1950s and 1960s, so there’s at least some historical success to point to in the longevity argument.

It’s to the point where the arguments against UConn being a blue blood are funny. For some reason, Indiana gets a lot of credit for its titles from 40+ years ago and Kansas is looked at favorably for consistently choking in the Final Four. People can prop them up all they want, but I would never trade UConn’s resume for theirs.
 
UCTitleTown said:
Something popped into my head that might be cool. The USWNT in soccer adds a star to the crest on their jersey whenever they win a World Cup. I think it would be cool to do something like that on the UConn men's jerseys. I know in the case of USWNT, it also drives additional jersey sales because fans want the newest one, and could do the same for UConn. If not on the jerseys, maybe in the striping on the shorts or something?
Expand ...
They did that on the jerseys around '11. My kemba jersey has stars on the pattern on back for the 3 NCs
 
Husky25 said:
"I'm not knockin'em." - Rob Parker.

Yes you are, Rob. That's your schtick. I don't know how he still has a audience, because he knocks on everyone. I suppose he's a sports entertainment provocateur, but it is so transparent.

No, UConn didn't beat a 1 seed, but they beat three teams that did. Two factors contributed to UConn's 5th title that were totally outside their control. 1) The Selection Committee did a sub-par job this go-'round, and 2) The 1s didn't take care of their own business. Heck, 3/4 of my Final 4, didn't make the second week.

Granted the brackets are set before the final AP poll is released, but they can't even fall back on that. In the week 18 poll, UConn and KSU were #11 and #12, respectively. UConn went 1-1 in the BET, up one spot to #10, and ended up on the 4 line. KSU lost in the BXIIT (after losing the week prior as well), was ranked #15 entering the Tournament, but maintained their higher seed. Ironically, if UConn was properly seeded, their chances of winning decrease.

Talking heads also still don't account for the increasing parity or that recruiting is ever evolving. Information has increased exponentially since the the 90's (Internet), let alone from 50-60 years ago when Sam Gilbert's money was taking care of Kareem, Bill Walton, and Gale Goodrich. For instance, what are the chances that a player like Johnell Powell ends up in Boca vs. IUPUI or Valpo in 1996? Not only has AAU exploded, there is so much coverage, that coaches on a tighter budget can still research recruits from their office. Now even consider the game changers that are NIL or the transfer portal, of which we are just seeing the scratches upon the surface. Gone are the days where one may just pencil in the 1s and 2s straight to the Sweet 16.
Expand ...
who is he? honest question.
 
storrsroars said:
The question to ask is: "Why does "blue blood" mean so much to UConn fans?"
Expand ...
it means absolutely zero to me. it's a way for people who have their hierarchy based on basketball 40+ years ago to feel superior. that's great for them. have at it.

how many of the people on social media arguing about "who's a blue blood" watched a college basketball game before 1990? look at anything close to recent history, and the story tells itself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
181
Guests online
4,414
Total visitors
4,595
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
164,677
Messages
4,406,152
Members
10,223
Latest member
Stronga12


.
..
Top Bottom