Uconn hits a low GSR rate of 8% - national average @ 70 | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Uconn hits a low GSR rate of 8% - national average @ 70

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
3,989
Reaction Score
7,292
Wasn't the 2005-2010 time when Calhoun had yearly health problems? I know he was absent multiple times for them.
As one who has had multiple health problems since 06 I can tell you your mine says go but your body says no.
 

joober jones

Finally Non-Fat Guy
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
4,736
Reaction Score
9,654
It looks like there are 5 guys who were in school for a full 8 semesters in that time frame - Austrie, Dyson, Edwards, Adrien, Mandeldove. One graduated.

That isn't a big enough sample to get worked up about, especially since the next wave (Kemba, Donnell, Chuck) graduated - assuming Kemba took care of his last few credits.


I know Dyson graduated but wasn't aware Austrie didn't. That's kind of surprising.
 
Joined
Aug 28, 2011
Messages
27,766
Reaction Score
71,195
The black eye is that many of the non-graduates are millionaires. Drummond counts against us.

Guys like Tony Robertson who came back and got their degrees years later don't count. So any of the current group who come back later, will they still count against us. Guys who transferred and get their degrees elsewhere count against us even though they graduated.

In short, we are not as bad as that 8% makes us sound. Our numbers will never compete with Sacred Heart or Sienna. We are just a completely different case than most of the nation.
 

Mr. Wonderful

Whistleblower
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
2,782
Reaction Score
8,448
Graduation rates by any criteria are an awful way to measure the value of a student's experience at a university. It's a metric that doesn't even scratch the surface, actually. Drawing conclusions one way or the other is to give the subject more time than it merits.

Poor science makes me sad. People will believe anything if it has a percent sign attached.
 

ctchamps

We are UConn!! 6 >>>1!
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
17,272
Reaction Score
43,448
Graduation rates by any criteria are an awful way to measure the value of a student's experience at a university. It's a metric that doesn't even scratch the surface, actually. Drawing conclusions one way or the other is to give the subject more time than it merits.

Poor science makes me sad. People will believe anything if it has a percent sign attached.
And this is the crux of the matter. Nicely stated!
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,776
Reaction Score
14,246
How does a Wolf situation effect the graduation?
Since he wouldn't have been a scholarship player is he out of the mix?
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2011
Messages
5,776
Reaction Score
14,246
The black eye is that many of the non-graduates are millionaires. Drummond counts against us.
Drummond was a walk on.
Guys like Tony Robertson who came back and got their degrees years later don't count. So any of the current group who come back later, will they still count against us. Guys who transferred and get their degrees elsewhere count against us even though they graduated.

In short, we are not as bad as that 8% makes us sound. Our numbers will never compete with Sacred Heart or Sienna. We are just a completely different case than most of the nation.
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
92,476
Reaction Score
356,934
In short, we are not as bad as that 8% makes us sound. Our numbers will never compete with Sacred Heart or Sienna. We are just a completely different case than most of the nation.

Curious - Which schools would you put into the mix of the schools we should be competing with?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Online statistics

Members online
279
Guests online
2,577
Total visitors
2,856

Forum statistics

Threads
160,182
Messages
4,220,274
Members
10,083
Latest member
ultimatebee


.
Top Bottom