I don't understand this statement. Are you saying that gays are not equal in value or significance to straights?
You're doing exactly what I said my issue was.
I'm saying that gay people, as individuals, are entitled to the same legal rights as non-gays. Shouldn't that be enough?
I'm insulted for having the opinion that two guys getting it on is eeew?
See the point? The point is, many gay people don't just want equal rights. They also want to be viewed as one equivalent variation of several possibilities. And, if you don't accept that position, you are vilified, even if you completely support their equal treatment under the law, as I do.
Does that help?
The result, of course, culturally, is that some gay people don't just want equal access to marriage, military, and such - what some want is to change the culture so that people don't view homosexuality as a disturbing/repulsive aberration.
I absolutely support the rights of gays, but I also absolutely support the rights of people to be disturbed/offended by the behavior. Many gays don't support that 2nd right.
An example of where this becomes a battleground is, for example, in the public classrooms, where some gay advocates would want to move the curriculum toward materials that normalize gay relationships and present it as an equivalent variation to heterosexual interaction to young children. The problem, of course, is that many people view homosexuality as an aberration, not a variation, and they would not want their children subjected to that curriculum.
There's your fight right there.
That's not equal treatment under the law - that's equal treatment under the culture. That's the real battle that's being fought - the marriage thing is simply one trench in that war.