UConn Football Summer/Fall of 2017 - Camp REStorred | Page 9 | The Boneyard

UConn Football Summer/Fall of 2017 - Camp REStorred

Randy doesn't believe in preseason games during the season. Sherriffs worked the entire spring practice. It makes sense to give the guys arriving on campus in the fall an early look. Pindell getting prime snaps now doesn't mean much. If he is still running the 1's next week then we'll talk.

Or you can skim the daily practice coverage for turnovers. RE 1.0 played the guy who protected the ball.
 
SubbaBub said:
Randy doesn't believe in preseason games during the season. Sherriffs worked the entire spring practice. It makes sense to give the guys arriving on campus in the fall an early look. Pindell getting prime snaps now doesn't mean much. If he is still running the 1's next week then we'll talk.

Or you can skim the daily practice coverage for turnovers. RE 1.0 played the guy who protected the ball.
Expand ...


You've seen the INT's as well?
 
huskymedic said:
Expand ...

OK, I'm a little lazy to go and look this up but, have we ever scrimmaged 1/3 of the way through fall camp before? Maybe we did with RE v1. Regardless, it seems this is the new staff's way of "stressing" (see recent interview with OL coach JB Grimes) the talent to separate the 1's and 2's from the 3's so they can focus on the 1's and 2's the remainder of camp and develop some unit cohesion. I'm thinking OL and QB here, mainly.
 
.-.
cttxus said:
OK, I'm a little lazy to go and look this up but, have we ever scrimmaged 1/3 of the way through fall camp before? Maybe we did with RE v1. Regardless, it seems this is the new staff's way of "stressing" (see recent interview with OL coach JB Grimes) the talent to separate the 1's and 2's from the 3's so they can focus on the 1's and 2's the remainder of camp and develop some unit cohesion. I'm thinking OL and QB here, mainly.
Expand ...


I am too lazy too, but I believe a once a week scrimmage was the norm under Diaco too.
 
cttxus said:
OK, I'm a little lazy to go and look this up but, have we ever scrimmaged 1/3 of the way through fall camp before? Maybe we did with RE v1. Regardless, it seems this is the new staff's way of "stressing" (see recent interview with OL coach JB Grimes) the talent to separate the 1's and 2's from the 3's so they can focus on the 1's and 2's the remainder of camp and develop some unit cohesion. I'm thinking OL and QB here, mainly.
Expand ...

If they "scrimmaged" today as AD Dave alludes - this is at least #2 since camp started on the 29th by my count.
 

>>Carrezola is now exclusively a defensive end in coordinator Billy Crocker’s 3-3-5 defense, while Stapleton has found a home at outside linebacker.

“My position has definitely changed,” Stapleton said. “I am more of a traditional linebacker instead of the defensive end/linebacker I was playing before. My hand is not in the dirt as much, but I am still going to get down there from time to time. But I think it is cool that even though he is at defensive end and I am at linebacker, we both get to play at the same time which is really great. We always used to joke of who is going to become the first true d-lineman and he got the spot. Pretty soon he’ll be a 3-technique (interior defensive lineman).”>>

>>“Under Coach (Bob) Diaco, we were more of a conservative defense, bend but don’t break, now we are more attacking,” Britton said. “We are going to give up big plays but we are also going to get some big plays. I feel like I am better suited for the defense.<<
 
Last edited:
huskymedic said:
>>“Under Coach (Bob) Diaco, we were more of a conservative defense, bend but don’t break, now we are more attacking,” Britton said. “We are going to give up big plays but we are also going to get some big plays. I feel like I am better suited for the defense.<<
Expand ...
How does everyone feel about this? Big plays are bound to happen against any defense, but this quote makes it sound like they're expected to happen. Crocker's new defense, is attacking and forces turnovers but hopefully doesn't give up too many big plays.
 
LB is paper thin right now, especially with the injuries to Diggs/Levenberry that it'd concern me if Britton weren't pushing for a starting spot.
 
.-.
BNich said:
How does everyone feel about this? Big plays are bound to happen against any defense, but this quote makes it sound like they're expected to happen. Crocker's new defense, is attacking and forces turnovers but hopefully doesn't give up too many big plays.
Expand ...
It tells me we're not playing four corners in the first qtr. Attacking on defense (and, hopefully, offense) leads to rhythm, tempo, momentum.. all the things we were afraid of for the last few years. It means we're competing rather than hoping for low scoring and close. And finally, it tells the players that you believe in them.
 
BNich said:
How does everyone feel about this? Big plays are bound to happen against any defense, but this quote makes it sound like they're expected to happen. Crocker's new defense, is attacking and forces turnovers but hopefully doesn't give up too many big plays.
Expand ...

It sounds like a Don Brown defense. Which means 90% of the time it will be fun to watch, and 10% it will be painful. Remember those 3rd and 15s that would get converted? Those will be back. But...I still like the approach overall and it is much more entertaining to watch.
 
Edsall 1.0 played a bend but don't break defense. Very traditional 4-3. This time around he is playing the 3-3-5. The purpose of this defense is to disguise where the pressure is coming from and create TOs.

You can't have both. You can create pressure. Or lay back and keep everything in front of you.
 
BNich said:
How does everyone feel about this? Big plays are bound to happen against any defense, but this quote makes it sound like they're expected to happen. Crocker's new defense, is attacking and forces turnovers but hopefully doesn't give up too many big plays.
Expand ...

Defensive scheme matters most in context of the overall team.

Bend but don’t break is fine, if you have a similarly long-running offense. The problem arises when you can’t get the defense off of the field, and you then go 3 and out. Repeatedly. That’s exactly what the diasco caused.
 
BNich said:
How does everyone feel about this? Big plays are bound to happen against any defense, but this quote makes it sound like they're expected to happen. Crocker's new defense, is attacking and forces turnovers but hopefully doesn't give up too many big plays.
Expand ...
I'll take an aggressive attacking defense over playing four quarters of "prevent" any day of the week.
 
.-.
TheDoggPound said:
LB is paper thin right now, especially with the injuries to Diggs/Levenberry that it'd concern me if Britton weren't pushing for a starting spot.
Expand ...

I think TJ Gardner brings speed. Gardner and Beavers will be playing this year if Santana and Gilmartin can't deliver and Diggs cannot recover.
 
BNich said:
How does everyone feel about this? Big plays are bound to happen against any defense, but this quote makes it sound like they're expected to happen. Crocker's new defense, is attacking and forces turnovers but hopefully doesn't give up too many big plays.
Expand ...

If you are a firm believer that turnover ratio is more indicative of wins vs. losses than almost any other statistic, which I am, then this should make you feel great.

Teams like Western Michigan and San Diego State were among the top 5 in turnover margin last year, and they were also in the final AP top 25 ranking. That's not an accident. You can go back over the years and see the correlation, and it is really strong.

And LOL to the comment that we'll have to deal with the feeling of giving up a 3rd and 15, as if we didn't have that experience over the last few years anyways... ;)
 
ShakyTheMohel said:
It sounds like a Don Brown defense. Which means 90% of the time it will be fun to watch, and 10% it will be painful. Remember those 3rd and 15s that would get converted? Those will be back. But...I still like the approach overall and it is much more entertaining to watch.
Expand ...
beat me to it... was thinking the same thing. Brown's D was aggressive, brought pressure form all over the place, and it generated a lot of big plays on D, but did give up the occasional big play on O (I think Western Michigan just scored another 50+ yard TD at the Rent while I was typing this). I'm fine with that approach.
 
.-.
CL82 said:
I'll take an aggressive attacking defense over playing four quarters of "prevent" any day of the week.
Expand ...

Diaco was basically, bend then break.

The D was horrifically bad at turning the ball over.

I don't mind giving up big plays - that's football, but we need to make some big plays on D too.
 
scoobydoo said:
Diaco was basically, bend then break.

The D was horrifically bad at turning the ball over.

I don't mind giving up big plays - that's football, but we need to make some big plays on D too.
Expand ...

One sure sign will be comparing this season's tackles for loss with last season's. We should see an increase, hopefully a big one. It should be more exciting to watch an aggressive D trying to create turnovers vs. a passive D laying back and waiting for bad things to happen.
 
I'm most excited to see Skanes, Beals and Dixon at WR and Vickers and Hopkins in the backfield. I think these 5 guys could be due for a break out season in the new system. Looks like a lot of young fresh faces in the defensive backfield. But this will only be great for the future of the program. Some could potentially become 4 year starters.
 
.-.
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,269
Messages
4,560,756
Members
10,452
Latest member
WashingtonH


Top Bottom