- Joined
- Sep 20, 2011
- Messages
- 415
- Reaction Score
- 414
It's an interesting read, but the one part i quibble about is the history. None of the kids being recruited remembers the Yankee Conference, none of them remember the SEC not being king of the hill, none of them remember Oregon pre-2K, etc. History for recruits is the last few years and the fact that we can't sell our history is not because we can't point to what we did in the 60s and 70s; it's because we have done nothing this decade.
What the article implies is we need a "name" head coach to attract the recruits. Then winning can attract the next wave. While winning and attendance are spuring expansion, meanwhile, on a parrallel track, our academic and research platform is elevated to AAU status. We are then a prime candidate for the next wave of expansion and realignment. But back to coaching. Names are iffy things. For every Tuberville there's a Wandstadt. Frankly, let's hope for a new OC next year, a turnaround year for PP and a bowl game. Given our current circumstance, that's better than wishing for failure so we can get a new coach.
GDL is not the key to that success.
Is the writer an intern at the paper or a grad assistant to PP?
"It's incredible how far we've fallen in national perception in the P era.
Being compared to pre-Schiano Rutgers now. God almighty.
"Greg Schiano did the same thing at Rutgers. Think about Rutgers football before Schaino got there and where it is now. If I'm a UConn fan and I see that happening to Rutgers, I have to believe that it can happen for UConn, too."
It's incredible how far we've fallen in national perception in the P era.
Being compared to pre-Schiano Rutgers now. God almighty.
How far has UConn fallen in the national perception? You really think anyone outside of CT is impressed with UConn's body of work so far? I think people expected UConn to be terrible when they moved to D1A, sort of like the Duke football of the BE - and it didn't happen. So it was a nice story. But it should all be kept in perspective. UConn has gone bowling - a bunch of mid tier bowls. Great. A BCS bowl with a 4 loss team and the nation cried about the injustice of such an undeserving team getting in. And then proceeds to get blown out by OU. A win at ND. In overtime against a mediocre Irish team that sees its coach fired shortly thereafter.
I'd love to see UConn become great, don't get me wrong. But you have to be in a lofty place before you can fall far, and if you think the nation has ever been impressed with UConn football, I couldn't disagree with you more.
During the Edsall years, I think most knowledgeable college football respected UConn's body of work in such a short period of time.
Agreed.
Nobody in the SEC or B1G was going to say UConn was a great team, but I think everyone knew we were solid. Take that Stevie Superior and the Gamecocks.
Regardless of where we fell on the national scale in the Edsall years it was typically solid/average. Now, after two 5-7 seasons, you would think we are one of the worst programs in FBS by the way people talk about UConn.
It's a small thing, but I remember Herbstreit picking UConn over Michigan 3 seasons ago on College Gameday. Now, that's one guy and one (wrong) prediction, but I think if you would have told UConn/the country in 2002 that a respected analyst would have been picked UConn over Michigan in Ann Arbor, I think you would have been called crazy. No doubt UConn was crashing the party.
We fought for respect the past decade and I think we won most fans over. However, the past two seasons have seemingly erased all that equity.