nelsonmuntz
Point Center
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 45,930
- Reaction Score
- 38,037
In the event (which I think is very slim) that the ACC wanted to go to a hybrid model and the Big East schools, who rejected the hybrid approach when they left to form the current Big East are suddenly willing to entertain it... I don't see a wholesale merger. The ACC has the money and the power... they can be selective; they're not chasing Butler/DePaul (they have Notre Dame covering Indy & Chicago). Providence is stuck between BC & UConn & may be left out, while St. John's and Villanova would probably make the cut.
That would be stupid and self destructive for all involved. No one is doing that.
UConn’s strength is that there is only one UConn. There are no other expansion options for the ACC, except maybe Boise. There are certainly no expansion candidates that 1) bring a basketball brand name, 2) have a credible football program, 3) bring a valuable market. Every year this reality becomes more pronounced.
The ACC is not going to add a handful of basketball only programs and these programs wouldn’t leave the Big East. The biggest and most obvious reason is that the ACC can’t afford to buy them, nor are the Big East schools in a desperate situation financially. A full merger gives both sides security and brings the Big East basketball agreement with the schools to pay for it.
It may be too late to matter. With House, there are likely several ACC schools that are fine running out the current contract and gradually downgrading athletics. There is little incentive for these schools to do anything big to change their trajectory.