Uconn Basketball considering joining the Big 12 in 2026 | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Uconn Basketball considering joining the Big 12 in 2026

People are looking just at the "now" and divorcing context. Louisville hit #1 in the polls for the first time ever in the ACC. Then their coach melted down. Then they hired a clown.

Syracuse had a very good beginning to their time in the ACC, but Boeheim was way past his prime.

Pitt lost their coach. . . and they weren't some traditional power anyway, so they were always a poor coaching hire away from returning to where they were in the 1990s.

BC was never really all that good.

Basketball-wise, Miami has been fine. Virginia Tech has been fine.

As long as we have Hurley, we'll be fine in MBB. We'll be fine in WBB for a few more years, and that will continue if we are in a real conference afterwards. Football literally has nowhere to go but up.
This is correct. And Miami football actually did exactly what they said they would do. In the Big East they felt they needed to win at all costs due to the way the Big East distributed money. In the ACC they got a guaranteed equal payout. So they cleaned up their act largely
 
Not at all.
The Big 12 schools must have agreed with him in 2023 when they voted to not allow UConn to join.
He mentioned that it may not be in the best interest of the athletes to travel so far to play, and that a stable conference today may not be as stable in the future.
His reasoning was logical & he showed compassion for the athletes.
As a US Senator he knows how to evaluate complex issues.
The proof will be whether the Big 12 actually allows UConn to join this time around or not.
Stay tuned & we'll see what happens.
I disagree. He’s out of his element on this topic
 
UConn Mega-Booster Takes Stance on Huskies Possibly Joining the Big 12


 
I'm not a fan of this move. I don't like the geography, the absence of historical rivalries, the long delay for football to join.
I the ACC is a far better fit for the Huskies. Imagine the rivalry with Duke, NC, NCState, Miami, BC, GaTech, etc. And, far less travel.
Sooner or later the ACC is going to lose FSU and Clemson. Once that happens, UConn is the logical addition. Even BC will agree.
Wait for the ACC, please!
 
I'm not a fan of this move. I don't like the geography, the absence of historical rivalries, the long delay for football to join.
I the ACC is a far better fit for the Huskies. Imagine the rivalry with Duke, NC, NCState, Miami, BC, GaTech, etc. And, far less travel.
Sooner or later the ACC is going to lose FSU and Clemson. Once that happens, UConn is the logical addition. Even BC will agree.
Wait for the ACC, please!
Disagree. You take the bird in hand because there’s no guarantee they’ll get an ACC invite if FSU and/or Clemson leave. They may instead backfill with a southern AAC school (like SMU) or or one of the PAC 2. You can’t take that chance & pass on the guaranteed opportunity to get in the 3rd best conference that preserves both your basketball & football programs long term.

If the AAC wants to extend an (unsolicited) invite to Uconn, they should step up and do it now while there’s continued uncertainty about the B12.
 
I'm not a fan of this move. I don't like the geography, the absence of historical rivalries, the long delay for football to join.
I the ACC is a far better fit for the Huskies. Imagine the rivalry with Duke, NC, NCState, Miami, BC, GaTech, etc. And, far less travel.
Sooner or later the ACC is going to lose FSU and Clemson. Once that happens, UConn is the logical addition. Even BC will agree.
Wait for the ACC, please!
 
.-.
I'm not a fan of this move. I don't like the geography, the absence of historical rivalries, the long delay for football to join.
I the ACC is a far better fit for the Huskies. Imagine the rivalry with Duke, NC, NCState, Miami, BC, GaTech, etc. And, far less travel.
Sooner or later the ACC is going to lose FSU and Clemson. Once that happens, UConn is the logical addition. Even BC will agree.
Wait for the ACC, please!
I must have missed where the ACC commissioner is pitching us to their presidents.
 
I must have missed where the ACC commissioner is pitching us to their presidents.
This. So we have no conversation with the ACC. There is the hope that maybe at some point in the future something shakes loose in the ACC, while that something (at least according to everything out there) also moves some of the other schools people want us to play out of the ACC (UNC for example). We can get more money now, in a conference that is better for many sports. All reasons to hold out hope for a conference that has never even shown interest to turn down a commissioner who clearly wants us. Got it.
 
It seems to me if espn wanted the ACC to survive and compete long term, it would treat the ACC like the SEC and pay them their money. Instead it is using the GOR to keep them captive at below market rates. I know it's not that simple but that's the way it seems.

I tried to envision a scenerio where the ACC sticks together and competes with the P2 even if a couple of players leave. I don't see it. I'm sure UNC would rather go to the P2 and be a .500 team rather than compete in its homegrown conference.

I'm sure the ACC will take Oregon St, Washington St, USF, FAU, ECU, Temple, Tulane and Trinity before it invites UConn.

ACC is dead to me. Big East until the Big XII invitation comes.
 
I think that the Big 12 is slowly morphing into a powerhouse basketball conference and, as such, realizes that the addition of Uconn is definitely to their advantage. It would probably be a good move even with the travel issues and with the losses of Texas and Oklahoma I feel Uconn can at least compare to some of the lower football teams in the conference.
they're already a powerhouse basketball conference, better than the Big East.
 
.-.
I'm not a fan of this move. I don't like the geography, the absence of historical rivalries, the long delay for football to join.
I the ACC is a far better fit for the Huskies. Imagine the rivalry with Duke, NC, NCState, Miami, BC, GaTech, etc. And, far less travel.
Sooner or later the ACC is going to lose FSU and Clemson. Once that happens, UConn is the logical addition. Even BC will agree.
Wait for the ACC, please!
Problem is that the ACC is never logical when it comes to UConn. They will take Tulane and USF before UConn.
 
I'm not a fan of this move. I don't like the geography, the absence of historical rivalries, the long delay for football to join.
I the ACC is a far better fit for the Huskies. Imagine the rivalry with Duke, NC, NCState, Miami, BC, GaTech, etc. And, far less travel.
Sooner or later the ACC is going to lose FSU and Clemson. Once that happens, UConn is the logical addition. Even BC will agree.
Wait for the ACC, please!
Then what? What those teams leave for the Big 12?
 
The pro B12 folks seem so hostile to any opposition, and clearly the only argument for going is money. But will basketball actually get more money? I get it’s good for football and baseball fans.
 
The pro B12 folks seem so hostile to any opposition, and clearly the only argument for going is money. But will basketball actually get more money? I get it’s good for football and baseball fans.
This isn't a serious comment.

Who will get more money out of this?? THE UCONN ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT!!

It's good for UConn. When you state that "clearly the only argument for going is money", it makes me glad that you don't run the athletic department. It turns out you can't run it without.... money...
 
The pro B12 folks seem so hostile to any opposition, and clearly the only argument for going is money. But will basketball actually get more money? I get it’s good for football and baseball fans.
At this point I’m convinced you people can’t comprehend revenue sharing and its implications.

Please stop posting about this until you understand why UConn basketball can’t compete at a national championship level if we don’t have comparable revenue sharing capabilities to our contemporaries.

Top recruits in men’s and women’s basketball will not take significant pay cuts to play for us, our coaches cannot make up for that talent gap. Short term we’ll be alright, but one year the new financial realities of college basketball will hit, and you’ll be wondering why we didn’t push harder to continue competing at the highest level.

Wake up.
 
.-.
At this point I’m convinced you people can’t comprehend revenue sharing and its implications.

Please stop posting about this until you understand why UConn basketball can’t compete at a national championship level if we don’t have comparable revenue sharing capabilities to our contemporaries.

Top recruits in men’s and women’s basketball will not take significant pay cuts to play for us, our coaches cannot make up for that talent gap. Short term we’ll be alright, but one year the new financial realities of college basketball will hit, and you’ll be wondering why we didn’t push harder to continue competing at the highest level.

Wake up.
The lack of foresight from so many people, especially national media members who cover the sport, is pretty unbelievable. I'm not sure these people could make a plan of what to make for dinner before they go to the grocery store.
 
At this point I’m convinced you people can’t comprehend revenue sharing and its implications.

Please stop posting about this until you understand why UConn basketball can’t compete at a national championship level if we don’t have comparable revenue sharing capabilities to our contemporaries.

Top recruits in men’s and women’s basketball will not take significant pay cuts to play for us, our coaches cannot make up for that talent gap. Short term we’ll be alright, but one year the new financial realities of college basketball will hit, and you’ll be wondering why we didn’t push harder to continue competing at the highest level.

Wake up.
Also one year the power conferences will make their own basketball tourney and have their own selection criteria that may or may not involve the small conferences in some lessor form. Never underestimate their ability to hog everything they can
 
The pro B12 folks seem so hostile to any opposition, and clearly the only argument for going is money. But will basketball actually get more money? I get it’s good for football and baseball fans.
We can debate whether it would be a good move for the football and baseball fans. The reality is that it should be a good move for both programs, the athletic department as a whole and the school (which in all candor is how we should look at this).

It will also be a great opportunity for the men's basketball program (even if we do limit the number of games that we play annually with Seton Hall, Providence, DePaul and Georgetown).

One thing nobody has brought up yet: a few years down the road, if we have a year where are 21-10 with a loss in the BET semifinals, finished tied for third in the BE and are left out of the big dance because they only picked two BE schools how will our fan base react? Look at what they did to Seton Hall this past season and tell me they'll never marginalize the BE to a two bid league.
 
We can debate whether it would be a good move for the football and baseball fans. The reality is that it should be a good move for both programs, the athletic department as a whole and the school (which in all candor is how we should look at this).

It will also be a great opportunity for the men's basketball program (even if we do limit the number of games that we play annually with Seton Hall, Providence, DePaul and Georgetown).

One thing nobody has brought up yet: a few years down the road, if we have a year where are 21-10 with a loss in the BET semifinals, finished tied for third in the BE and are left out of the big dance because they only picked two BE schools how will our fan base react? Look at what they did to Seton Hall this past season and tell me they'll never marginalize the BE to a two bid league.
The end game is both the football and basketball money, and they don't care about any of the little guys. Big time betting has taken over college sports and they don't need the little guys upsets to have people watch.
 
At this point I’m convinced you people can’t comprehend revenue sharing and its implications.

Please stop posting about this until you understand why UConn basketball can’t compete at a national championship level if we don’t have comparable revenue sharing capabilities to our contemporaries.

Top recruits in men’s and women’s basketball will not take significant pay cuts to play for us, our coaches cannot make up for that talent gap. Short term we’ll be alright, but one year the new financial realities of college basketball will hit, and you’ll be wondering why we didn’t push harder to continue competing at the highest level.

Wake up.
You’re right, I don’t understand how revenue sharing is going to work. It seems to me that for basketball to get more money, either UConn basketball would have to make more in the B12 or basketball would share in (distant future) football money. I’m not sure either will happen.
 
.-.
You’re right, I don’t understand how revenue sharing is going to work. It seems to me that for basketball to get more money, either UConn basketball would have to make more in the B12 or basketball would share in (distant future) football money. I’m not sure either will happen.
About $20 million in revenue will go to players. It's essentially a salary cap on revenue. How that is divided is yet to be seen.

If you're only making $7m off your media contract then you have to make up a $13m difference in order to compete. And that's just on salaries. If you're making $31m then you've got another $8m that can be spent on other things.

It's really not complicated to see why we will need more money when this goes into effect next year.

We're already heavily subsidized, so this means we need to come up with another $20m/yr if we want to be competitive in athletics. Even with the new big east contract we're losing $13m right off the bat.
 
About $20 million in revenue will go to players. It's essentially a salary cap on revenue. How that is divided is yet to be seen.

If you're only making $7m off your media contract then you have to make up a $13m difference in order to compete. And that's just on salaries. If you're making $31m then you've got another $8m that can be spent on other things.

It's really not complicated to see why we will need more money when this goes into effect next year.

We're already heavily subsidized, so this means we need to come up with another $20m/yr if we want to be competitive in athletics. Even with the new big east contract we're losing $13m right off the bat.
OK, but that doesn’t answer whether basketball will actually get more money in the B12 or whether the difference will go to football.
 
OK, but that doesn’t answer whether basketball will actually get more money in the B12 or whether the difference will go to football.
The athletic department gets more money. They don't write a check to the basketball team or the football team. The athletic department gets the money and uses it to help fund all athletic operations.
 
OK, but that doesn’t answer whether basketball will actually get more money in the B12 or whether the difference will go to football.
Yes it does. Because to be competitive you're going to have to spend the max level of cash. Big XII money helps us get to that level of spending. Otherwise we have to ask the state and donors for more money to hit the cap.

Imagine being in the Big East and independent in football, and having to keep up spending even with other big east teams. It's basically impossible. Dropping football would be in the cards and then we're eternally doomed
 
I'm not a fan of this move. I don't like the geography, the absence of historical rivalries, the long delay for football to join.
I the ACC is a far better fit for the Huskies. Imagine the rivalry with Duke, NC, NCState, Miami, BC, GaTech, etc. And, far less travel.
Sooner or later the ACC is going to lose FSU and Clemson. Once that happens, UConn is the logical addition. Even BC will agree.
Wait for the ACC, please!I

I cannot understand why we keep turning the ACC down! What is our leadership thinking?
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,361
Messages
4,567,759
Members
10,469
Latest member
xxBlueChips


Top Bottom