UConn athletic department deficit reached $42 million in 2019 with a decline in ticket sales and league revenue | Page 4 | The Boneyard

UConn athletic department deficit reached $42 million in 2019 with a decline in ticket sales and league revenue

Whatever, if people will pay it, charge it. This stuff isn’t cheap, and yes, you can drop football to FCS but you won’t save any money. Drop football altogether, then yeah, you’ll save money but you’ll also be the only major state u without football. Dropping football makes no sense, so let’s just try to win football games instead. Stupid.
 
Whatever, if people will pay it, charge it. This stuff isn’t cheap, and yes, you can drop football to FCS but you won’t save any money. Drop football altogether, then yeah, you’ll save money but you’ll also be the only major state u without football. Dropping football makes no sense, so let’s just try to win football games instead. Stupid.

FCS schools such as Lehigh, Lafayette and Holy Cross spend 5, 6, 7 million and take in revenues of 5 or 6 million. They lose money on football but we're talking several hunded thousand, not $10 million. Truth is you would save money playing New Hampshire, Maine and Albany and Holy Cross but is the drop in prestige worth it?
 
"Student Aid" of $17.7M
(This is a phantom number largely generated by charging full out of state tuition for each athlete.)

CDRA "Rent" of $3.5M.
(This is one state entity paying another one. The high "rent" for the XL and the Rent masks the lack of profitability of the CDRA and inflates the cost of athletics at UConn.)

That's $21.2M of the $42M short fall.

I haven't looked at the most recent numbers but in the past UConn's "administrative overhead" was higher that the average P5 school that is a place I'd look for reductions.

Keep in mind as well that the school estimates that travel costs will drop by $2M next year.

UConn can get this to a more 1) reasonable number by changing the way they account for athlete tuition; and
2) changing our "rental agreement" with the CDRA to profit split rather than a fix fee. That's a pretty easy fix. Clean up administrative overhead and start winning and all of sudden we back in the black, or at least close.

So is $21M a reasonable amount to spend on advertising/marketing for a $1B+ yearly institution? I'd say so.
 
UConn is at a small financial disadvantage because so many of the athletes are out of state students...

Say, compared to FSU:

For the 2018-19 school year, the AVERAGE cost of an in-state, undergrad athletic scholarship was approximately $22,456 and out-of-state, undergrad was $36,804. Our student-athletes are currently, and traditionally, almost evenly divided between Florida residents and non-Florida residents. That means that half are subject to in-state tuition and half to out-of-state tuition...total athletic scholarship costs of $11.5 million.

The Athletic Department is required to pay all of the student-athletes’ scholarship expenses, including tuition. Gifts from annual Seminole Booster donors (Golden Chief, Silver Chief, Tomahawk, etc.) have been transferred to the Athletic Department to pay those scholarship costs.
 
.-.
FCS schools such as Lehigh, Lafayette and Holy Cross spend 5, 6, 7 million and take in revenues of 5 or 6 million. They lose money on football but we're talking several hunded thousand, not $10 million. Truth is you would save money playing New Hampshire, Maine and Albany and Holy Cross but is the drop in prestige worth it?
Oh great. Now you want us compared to Lehigh and Lafayette? Great schools but swim in different markets.
 
UConn is at a small financial disadvantage because so many of the athletes are out of state students...

Say, compared to FSU:

For the 2018-19 school year, the AVERAGE cost of an in-state, undergrad athletic scholarship was approximately $22,456 and out-of-state, undergrad was $36,804. Our student-athletes are currently, and traditionally, almost evenly divided between Florida residents and non-Florida residents. That means that half are subject to in-state tuition and half to out-of-state tuition...total athletic scholarship costs of $11.5 million.

The Athletic Department is required to pay all of the student-athletes’ scholarship expenses, including tuition. Gifts from annual Seminole Booster donors (Golden Chief, Silver Chief, Tomahawk, etc.) have been transferred to the Athletic Department to pay those scholarship costs.
I'm not sure that it accounted for based upon the domicile of each student athlete

Regardless, since UConn is operating at capacity, I'm not sure that opportunity cost is the best way to account for the cost of student athletes
 
FCS schools such as Lehigh, Lafayette and Holy Cross spend 5, 6, 7 million and take in revenues of 5 or 6 million. They lose money on football but we're talking several hunded thousand, not $10 million. Truth is you would save money playing New Hampshire, Maine and Albany and Holy Cross but is the drop in prestige worth it?


So their football revenue is double ours? What?
 
I'm not sure that it accounted for based upon the domicile of each student athlete

Regardless, since UConn is operating at capacity, I'm not sure that opportunity cost is the best way to account for the cost of student athletes

Many universities turn away kids and are at full capacity...FSU's 2019 class had 57,000 applications received and they admitted 19,230.

But...maybe that is not the issue....

I wonder if the NCAA allows waivering all out of state tuition for athletes on scholarship if that benefit isn't available to all students?

I understand that it may not make a difference on "full ride" scholarships where all costs are school supported....but what happens to all the partial scholarships? Do they get automatic in state tuition even if out of state?
 
Many universities turn away kids and are at full capacity...FSU's 2019 class had 57,000 applications received and they admitted 19,230.

But...maybe that is not the issue....

I wonder if the NCAA allows waivering all out of state tuition for athletes on scholarship if that benefit isn't available to all students?

I understand that it may not make a difference on "full ride" scholarships where all costs are school supported....but what happens to all the partial scholarships? Do they get automatic in state tuition even if out of state?
Fair points, but how tuition is accounted for is essentially a journal entry. It can be whatever the school the school wants it to be.
 
Fair points, but how tuition is accounted for is essentially a journal entry. It can be whatever the school the school wants it to be.

You sure about that?

I know Florida public universities must report in-state vs out of state students....the tuition figures would not jive with the reported numbers.

A journal entry is auditable.
 
.-.
An auditor will follow a charge through the system to the source document...including the original application.

And may "test" the source document.
 
Last edited:
You sure about that?

I know Florida public universities must report in-state vs out of state students....the tuition figures would not jive with the reported numbers.

A journal entry is auditable.
Different thing right? Student athletes aren't paying tuition, at least for major sports.

I'm not aware of any external standard for allocating the cost of student athletes, are you? As long as the debit to athletic department and the credit to the university is reasonable it should be fine. Where it arguably gets trickier is partial grants, but there the amount that tuition is reduced is quantified.

Charging a student athlete the gross amount of out of state tuition doesn't reflect reality since it is a number that virtually no one pays.
 
UConn is at a small financial disadvantage because so many of the athletes are out of state students...

Say, compared to FSU:

For the 2018-19 school year, the AVERAGE cost of an in-state, undergrad athletic scholarship was approximately $22,456 and out-of-state, undergrad was $36,804. Our student-athletes are currently, and traditionally, almost evenly divided between Florida residents and non-Florida residents. That means that half are subject to in-state tuition and half to out-of-state tuition...total athletic scholarship costs of $11.5 million.

The Athletic Department is required to pay all of the student-athletes’ scholarship expenses, including tuition. Gifts from annual Seminole Booster donors (Golden Chief, Silver Chief, Tomahawk, etc.) have been transferred to the Athletic Department to pay those scholarship costs.

Actual cost of delivery of an education is the same no matter where people come from. This is an accounting convention.
 
Actual cost of delivery of an education is the same no matter where people come from. This is an accounting convention.

Yes..But:

One may ask..if as you posted...

"Actual cost of delivery of an education is the same no matter where people come from. This is an accounting convention."

Why are different tuition fee schedules set in the first place?

A state university exists to educate the citizens of the state and there is almost always state taxpayer money allocated for that purpose.

Taxpayers of one state may not desire to pay tax money to educate citizens of other states.

Florida's public four year institutions have their tuitions set/approved by the Florida Legislature...and the legislature recognizes that fact and sets higher out of state fees.

In Connecticut, the State Board of Regents sets tuition for all state institutions except for the University of Connecticut..which is set by a single campus board.

The University of Connecticut, while suffering from what the President terms inadequate funding, still was funded $328 million in state funds...

The problem for the university is that UConn in 2019 is funded at the level it was in 2008...

And the cavalry doesn't appear to be coming...

“It looks like moving forward, tuition and fees will continue to fund an ever-increasing portion of the operation of the University of Connecticut,” said Rep. Gregg Haddad, D-Mansfield and co-chair of the appropriations subcommittee on higher education. “I wonder at what point do those increases in tuition and fees impact the choices students are making."

One might ask...can you afford to educate young people from other states?

And if out of state folks on athletic scholarship are charged differently than regular students, how does the NCAA view that?

And what would the NCAA say about all of the partial scholarship sports where tuition is split between an individual and a scholarship? Extra benefit if they pay in-state tuition?
 
Last edited:
Yes..But:

One may ask..if as you posted...

"Actual cost of delivery of an education is the same no matter where people come from. This is an accounting convention."

Why are different tuition fee schedules set in the first place?

A state university exists to educate the citizens of the state and there is almost always state taxpayer money allocated for that purpose.

Taxpayers of one state may not desire to pay tax money to educate citizens of other states.

Florida's public four year institutions have their tuitions set/approved by the Florida Legislature...and the legislature recognizes that fact and sets higher out of state fees.

In Connecticut, the State Board of Regents sets tuition for all state institutions except for the University of Connecticut..which is set by a single campus board.

The University of Connecticut, while suffering from what the President terms inadequate funding, still was funded $328 million in state funds...

The problem for the university is that UConn in 2019 is funded at the level it was in 2008...

And the cavalry doesn't appear to be coming...

“It looks like moving forward, tuition and fees will continue to fund an ever-increasing portion of the operation of the University of Connecticut,” said Rep. Gregg Haddad, D-Mansfield and co-chair of the appropriations subcommittee on higher education. “I wonder at what point do those increases in tuition and fees impact the choices students are making."

One might ask...can you afford to educate young people from other states?

And if out of state folks on athletic scholarship are charged differently than regular students, how does the NCAA view that?
Mmm, but none of that really impacts the cost to the school of education, right? I get the sense that you know that.

And what would the NCAA say about all of the partial scholarship sports where tuition is split between an individual and a scholarship? Extra benefit if they pay in-state tuition?
As noted above is the most logical approach just to account for the amount of the scholarship? The amount of the partial scholarship is a line item on the students bill.
 
Pure out of state tuition waivers that aren’t available to the rest of the student body (i.e. neighboring state reciprocity agreements) are generally not allowed by the NCAA.

Also the NCAA requires the reporting of tuition amounts and cost of attendance for both in-state and out of state student athletes each year.
 
.-.
Yes..But:

One may ask..if as you posted...

"Actual cost of delivery of an education is the same no matter where people come from. This is an accounting convention."

Why are different tuition fee schedules set in the first place?

A state university exists to educate the citizens of the state and there is almost always state taxpayer money allocated for that purpose.

Taxpayers of one state may not desire to pay tax money to educate citizens of other states.

Florida's public four year institutions have their tuitions set/approved by the Florida Legislature...and the legislature recognizes that fact and sets higher out of state fees.

In Connecticut, the State Board of Regents sets tuition for all state institutions except for the University of Connecticut..which is set by a single campus board.

The University of Connecticut, while suffering from what the President terms inadequate funding, still was funded $328 million in state funds...

The problem for the university is that UConn in 2019 is funded at the level it was in 2008...

And the cavalry doesn't appear to be coming...

“It looks like moving forward, tuition and fees will continue to fund an ever-increasing portion of the operation of the University of Connecticut,” said Rep. Gregg Haddad, D-Mansfield and co-chair of the appropriations subcommittee on higher education. “I wonder at what point do those increases in tuition and fees impact the choices students are making."

One might ask...can you afford to educate young people from other states?

And if out of state folks on athletic scholarship are charged differently than regular students, how does the NCAA view that?

And what would the NCAA say about all of the partial scholarship sports where tuition is split between an individual and a scholarship? Extra benefit if they pay in-state tuition?

Right. But ultimately with regard to any given student - the cost of delivery of his/her education varies really on their major, etc. Not where they are from.
 
CL82..it is not the cost to the school...it is the subsidizing by state tax payers of out of state students...and the NCAA's stance on treating out of state sutudents differently if they have an athletic scholly...that is the crux.
 
Right. But ultimately with regard to any given student - the cost of delivery of his/her education varies really on their major, etc. Not where they are from.

OK...Are history majors charged considerably more tuition than math majors? I don't follow the relevancy of your comment to in-state vs out of state tuition charges.
 

The gist, if FBS doesn't work out, then go to FCS. Well that's true for Uconn and every other FBS program, even Alabama. Nothing new here. I still insist there are plenty of positives to sell this program to kids/fans and media. Five P5s on the schedule next year with only a few months to put it together. It is already more interesting than any recent schedules.
 
OK...Are history majors charged considerably more tuition than math majors? I don't follow the relevancy of your comment to in-state vs out of state tuition charges.

They aren't - but the reality is that if you wanted to assign a cost of delivery to each student - you could. That's not the way it works. But a history major and a chemistry major probably don't cost the same to educate. The fact that they both get charged the same price goes into the pricing policy - much like in-state/out-of-state tuition.

Point being - there is a pricing policy - and there is a cost of delivering services. The budgets are managed holistically - to achieve a desired outcome - demographics, etc. But to look at the AD math and say it is absolute - just isn't accurate. That is a cost accounting exercise - which is very much subject to decisions on how senior management wants to look at things. The only "audited" figures happen at the consolidated University level.
 
.-.
NO...

The difference between in state and out of state tuition is not the cost of education..but rather..

The cost of a partially government subsidized education vs an unsubsidized education.

Connecticut citizen-student tuition costs are subsidized in part by the Connecticut taxpayer...

Not so for out of state students who must bear the difference in the cost without subsidy.

Although the cost of educating an out of state student and in-state student may be the same...the cost to the university is greater for a student for which they do not receive state monies to educate.

And that is why there is such a thing as out of state tuition for public universities whose costs are partially subsidized by state taxes.

The University of Miami unlike Florida's public universities, as a private, charges the same for Florida students as it does for out of state students.

Same with Duke...private..no difference between tuition for in-state and out of state.
 
And in Connecticut...Yale does not differentiate tuition costs by state residence...because, as a private without a state government partial subsidy for Connecticut citizens, their costs are actually the same for in state and out of state.
 
What are guys arguing about? 'Cause it seems like apples and dump trucks.
 
NO...

The difference between in state and out of state tuition is not the cost of education..but rather..

The cost of a partially government subsidized education vs an unsubsidized education.

Connecticut citizen-student tuition costs are subsidized in part by the Connecticut taxpayer...

Not so for out of state students who must bear the difference in the cost without subsidy.

Although the cost of educating an out of state student and in-state student may be the same...the cost to the university is greater for a student for which they do not receive state monies to educate.

And that is why there is such a thing as out of state tuition for public universities whose costs are partially subsidized by state taxes.

The University of Miami unlike Florida's public universities, as a private, charges the same for Florida students as it does for out of state students.

Same with Duke...private..no difference between tuition for in-state and out of state.

That's a pricing convention. But it doesn't have anything to do with the cost of delivery. I'm not debating the merits of it - I'm just saying that it using in/out of state tuition numbers when calculating what it costs to deliver a scholarship doesn't make any sense. As a straw man - if the 2022 team is completely comprised of in-state players, does the cash flow of the school get any better? No. But the fake math that will spawn news articles in 2022 will say that the program is more profitable.

The issue being - we aren't getting money for the scholarships - so assigning different values to something that we are giving away for free is a notional concept - and pretty meaningless.
 
The athletic department was given a shelf life the moment Gampel was built at 8k seats and the Rent was built in East Hartford. Too busy trying to save Hartford instead helping Storrs reach it’s potential as an actual college town.
 
The athletic department was given a shelf life the moment Gampel was built at 8k seats and the Rent was built in East Hartford. Too busy trying to save Hartford instead helping Storrs reach it’s potential as an actual college town.

It didn't help - but hiring bad coaches was really the culprit.
 
.-.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,278
Messages
4,561,119
Members
10,454
Latest member
Uconn84


Top Bottom