- Joined
- Dec 25, 2011
- Messages
- 7,181
- Reaction Score
- 8,747
There is no cry for a BC-UConn football game in Greater Boston. It has less interest than a BC- Umass football scheduled game. That's understandable, as there are far, far more graduates of the Massachusetts State College system living within a 50 mile radius of Boston than there are Uconn graduates living within a 50 mile radius of Boston. So while its understandable that in Connecticut, or among UConn grads that there is a strong aching to play BC in football, such a scheduled game in Boston doesn't do much of anything at all for the vast majority of non BC alums in Greater Boston that follow BC football and go over to Chestnut Hill to see the games there.
But, there is a cry for BC versus Holy Cross football games? By who? The over +70 alumni crowd who remenber when HC had big-time sports (and owned BC)? When I lived in Boston, I took a friend, who is a multi-generation BC alumn, to BC at UConn at the Rent and he took me to the game at Alumni. He actually enjoyed the Rent and went to two more games (non BC games) with me noting that unless one is a MAJOR donor to BC and thus can use to adjacent parking deck to Alumni, getting to UConn football games is easier than BC (a slight exaggeration; but, it is a long bus ride from Needham to Newton -http://www.bceagles.com/ot/event-parking.html) and UConn has a better tailgating scene. What we both agree upon, and I believe it is the point that you and leadership in the Heights miss, is that New England needs UConn and BC, who are the only 2 major football programs in the region, to thrive for the sake of college football in New England. College football thrives because of fierce local rivalries, such as Alabama/Auburn, UCLA/USC, Army/Navy, Michiganetc. Those programs do not run away from it, they embrace it.