I was actually kidding about getting 5 points but I did think giving 5 was too much. We took 36 foul shots they took 16 and fouls were 27 to 16. Just because you're at home doesn't automatically mean you will get that big a gap in fouls whether you drive it in or not. Calling people stupid is fine these days I guess, just watch the presidential candidates and their supporters, it's what parts of America has devolved to.
I will respectfully disagree on the premise UConn got too many FTs compared to Gtown and beg you to watch the game again before making that claim. I admit I focused mostly on the second half, and you may have a case for the first half.
First take away the final 6 FTs where UConm was fouled on purpose to end the game. That makes it 30-16 and 27-16. Now look at all the threes they took. They literally took double the number UConn did (30-15).
Consider the rarity of getting a foul on a three point attempt and you can start to see why they had fewer FTs and more fouls. More jump shots means being slower to get in the bonus and double bonus in addition to not drawing shooting fouls. That right there is the majority of the difference.
In fact the refs (at least in the second) called very few off the ball fouls and let both teams play under the rim on rebounds. I saw one bad miss call in Georgetowns favor which resulted in a three for them anyway. They got a good percentage of calls for the amount of times they actually drove the ball.
On the flip side, I saw one bad call in UConns favor, but the refs also swallowed their whistle on quite a few drives where there was enough contact where refs could have called something.
They had a poor game plan in bombing so many threes against a smaller team.