UConn 3 PT % Leaders | Page 2 | The Boneyard

UConn 3 PT % Leaders

Huskyforlife

Akokbouk
Joined
Feb 19, 2013
Messages
12,821
Reaction Score
53,775
Surprisingly, this is almost exactly where Tyrese was at at this point in the season last year. He was shooting 43% through the first 10 games and went 3-22 in the last 12 which dropped him to 32% for the year. It would be really hard to have a worse stretch of games this year, but it is fair to expect his number to drop off some the rest of the season.
Surprised nobody has mentioned this.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2016
Messages
1,719
Reaction Score
15,717
It actually takes more than a full NBA season for 3pt% to stabilize. It's more like a full career in college (or 2 years for really voluminous shooters). There's a LOT of variance in it, as this whole thread indicates. Shooting stroke can also be like a golf stroke where guys just lose it for a while and slump, and also people improve over the off-seasons, or have their roles and volume (and thus difficulty of shots) dramatically increase. So really, it never stabilizes in college. Polley with the one COVID shortened year and one injury shortened year is only a little over halfway to stabilizing.

As to your likelihood of shots model, there's actually 2 variables. The skill of the shooter and the difficulty of the shot (also called shot quality). So you'd expect Akok to make 12 average difficulty shots out of 23 only 4% of the time. But he pretty much takes only in rhythm open catch and shoot 3 pointers, which are probably closer to 40-50% makes for 35% average shooters.
Yeah, I totally get that degree of difficulty is a huge variable that I haven’t (and can’t) take into account. I wouldn’t expect 21 or 23 shots to tell us too much, but even if Akok is really a 40% shooter only on wide open, catch-and-shoot threes, I’ll take it.

The other factor is defense. Right now, Andre Jackson has been more or less allowed to shoot threes. If he makes a few more, they’ll start to cover him tighter, and his percentage will likely drop. Of course, that should open up other offensive opportunities. All of these are reasons why basketball statistics can be harder to make sense of than baseball statistics.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
14,691
Reaction Score
99,278
That was the next thing I wanted to look at was the splits against good opponents, but didn't get a chance to do yet. I'll post that later
I considered "high level" games Atlantis, WVU, St Bonaventure, PC, Seton Hall. Not really a significant difference other than Cole, but matches what @auror said above

Cole - 18/48 38% in high level and 12/42 29% in low level

Polley - 13/40 33% and 14/39 36%

Hawkins - 6/18 33% and 6/17 35%
 
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
868
Reaction Score
3,291
You could say the worse shooting percentage comes from the hardest working defender....but then there is Polley.
 

HuskyHawk

The triumphant return of the Blues Brothers.
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Messages
33,617
Reaction Score
87,965
I expected Akok to shoot better from 3 (not this well!), and Cole being low isn’t surprising based on his volume, but on the whole, this is indeed very surprising. And yes, I understand that some of these percentages can be explained by small sample sizes and degree of difficulty.



So the top 3 are the guys most of this board said couldn’t shoot. :confused: I find it entirely predictable. Really disappointed that Gaff isn‘t shooting better, and more often. Hoped he’d become a decent SG option.
 

Online statistics

Members online
508
Guests online
5,027
Total visitors
5,535

Forum statistics

Threads
162,431
Messages
4,309,549
Members
10,132
Latest member
Lafayette


.
..
Top Bottom