- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 13,457
- Reaction Score
- 35,958
Oh, they still suck. But so did DePaul.I hate to toss logic into the situation, but you do realize that even WITH the hypothetical improvements, those teams are all left with RPIs greater than 200, with one exception. Why on earth does it make logical sense that those teams could, should, or would beat teams with sub 100 RPIs when theirs is 100 places worse ?!!
The bottom line is, those teams SUCKED. And there is no reason to expect a team that sucks to beat a team that isn't good, but doesn't SUCK. For instance, South Florida sucked out loud. On no planet should we expect them to magically beat Bowling Green, Florida State, or Georgia Southern, regardless of their RPI being over 100.
I can't run a scenario where I can adjust all their RPIs at once. The improvement of one school's RPI improves all the teams they play. So if ECU jumped to 143, and the others jumped into the low 200s, for each individual time I ran it for Houston, ECU was still a sub-200 team.
Point being, almost all those teams would have been ranked between 100-200 rather than sub-200 if they just won their terrible games.
That has no net effect on whether they suck or not. But it has a net effect on our conference RPI, and each school's individual RPI.
It probably makes Tulsa and Temple tournament teams this year.
It would almost certainly have had us on the bubble.
With all the same results except those last 5 schools winning games against garbage teams.