- Joined
- Aug 28, 2011
- Messages
- 2,275
- Reaction Score
- 2,941
I hate to toss logic into the situation, but you do realize that even WITH the hypothetical improvements, those teams are all left with RPIs greater than 200, with one exception. Why on earth does it make logical sense that those teams could, should, or would beat teams with sub 100 RPIs when theirs is 100 places worse ?!!I'm going to have a whole thread on this later...but this is the horror show this year:
View attachment 8804
I'll try to blow it up when I make the full post, but that was the bottom 5 teams OOC results and RPIs. And if they just didn't lose non-P5 sub-100 teams (not that hard) all of their RPIs would be much higher--higher even than they are listed there, every individual RPI improvement helps everyone else in the league.
(Edit: not sure why the attachment isn't larger, since it is bigger on my computer.)
The bottom line is, those teams SUCKED. And there is no reason to expect a team that sucks to beat a team that isn't good, but doesn't SUCK. For instance, South Florida sucked out loud. On no planet should we expect them to magically beat Bowling Green, Florida State, or Georgia Southern, regardless of their RPI being over 100.