The problem that voters face this year is that you actually have to find 25 teams worthy of the top-25.
Excellent point. It must be hard for the voters to make much sense out of the cluster-mess resumes of most of the top 35 to 50 teams. Good example is 14-5 (4-3 BE Conf) UConn beats ND on their floor a couple weeks ago, and then ND goes and beats #1 SU the other night. Now is SU not as good as the voters thought? Is UConn not as bad as their records seems to point to?
The voters take into account each week who beat who and who lost to who and if the results are wildly all over the place like it has been this year, with
team A beating Team B, but huh, then losing to Team C who beat what-the-f#%$ Team B, their heads begin to explode.
This sort of thing always happens, but it seems to be happening a lot more often this year.
The field just seems like one big cluster of flawed teams. Now didn't the SU loss take place without Fab Melo who's been playing well this season? Was someone else out for that game? With their full compliment of players I still think SU is one of the top teams in the nation, while UConn on the other hand, had F-4 to E-8 talent, but is playing like a bubble team right now...granted not with its compliment of players (missing Ryan Boatright). IMO, with RB all season long, I think this team would be around 19-1 or 18-2, and ranked somewhere in the Top 10.