- Joined
- Apr 10, 2015
- Messages
- 11,334
- Reaction Score
- 25,045
OK, they play in the Euroleague. But perhaps Americans need to go pro sooner. American men certainly suffer from lack of training, spending perhaps a year in college, then sitting on benches in the pros. European pros, both in basketball and soccer, turn pro early, get excellent training in the basics, and then rule the world. How many of the NBA top picks who stick are from overseas? How many of the top pros?
Maybe that Euro League system is better than the American system. Those two Russian post players tore up an excellent American team of the best players in their age group. And before that, the Japanese came close to an upset.
Didn't the Americans lose the Pan-American games a year ago to Canada? And the U16 team lost in the semis? Time for us to wake up and smell the coffee....
In the OLYMPIC games--USA got smart and stopped using College Amateurs vs Russian Professionals.
As long as USA uses real HS/College kids vs Russian Pros--the win/loss record shall remain as it is.
I am against changing the American system for HS/College kids. We already have too many pro teams --the WNBA proves the point, their crowds are thin.
What needs to be done, at the international level, is to dictate that a level playing field must exist and all those competing in the U23 and under must not have Pro experience or full time jobs.
It was once so--. OR the USA must build a training program that trains Pro level players and maintains teams of specific age(s) from 10 years old until they age out of the program.
Easy to do in closed societies--much harder to do in the USA--parents like kids to be kids.
The Canada loss in Pan Am was caused by that coach using Moriah and Stewie in too many games too long. In the final game both were exhausted, AND, Kia had her greatest game ever up to that point and a few years beyond. Should Canada have played that USA team a week before or one later, USA would win.