Both situations and players don't deserve to play for UConn.
Also, I believe charges were dropped on Wolfe, huge difference than being acquitted.
Being acquitted would mean that there was an expensive trial at which the state failed to prove that the defendant was guilty of a charged crime.
Enosch probably had the charges 'dropped' after completing the family violence program. It was a family case because his girlfriend was the victim.
The program is one of many get out of jail free cards or statutory second chances permitted in CT. For the most part, you only get one. You do not get to ask for accelerated rehabilitation after using the family violence program, for example.
Another such program is the alcohol education program which leads to a dismissal of DUI charges in CT. I'd bet that is what Tyler will petition the court for, unless there is a defense to be made on some factual issue.
One requires learning about the dangers of family violence and controlling anger. The other involves learning about the dangers of DUI and alcohol use generally.
The prior charges against Olander in FL were about trespass and were dismissed. I am sure that resort areas have many such cases and that most result in dismissals or small fines. The local police simply want to restore order as quickly as possible. Rehabilitating an offender in an out of state trespass case not something that a state is willing to spent money on.
I suppose one could argue that Wolfe's transgression is more serious because he assaulted someone. Alternatively, depending on facts we cannot know, some might argue that Olander risked more seriously injuring many.
Overall, I think the two CT incidents were relatively minor and equivalent. The FL trespassing case is even more minor that those two violations.