ShakyTheMohel
Is it 11:11 yet?
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2011
- Messages
- 8,835
- Reaction Score
- 20,907
Well, if you believe that BC is inherently evil and does not care about its student athletes health and welfare, it could easily be understood from that perspective it would seem to me. On the other hand, it is equally plausable that none of us has sufficient information on the medical condition to effectively evaluate the apparent difference of opinion from the medical community as they evaluate this athlete, and as he, his parents, and the school make their decision as to whether or not he is sufficienly fit enough to play football again..
There is definitely a grey area here that UConn wasn't willing to play in, yet BC was. Do you agree with that? Not sure if that makes BC 'inherently evil", but it definitely makes you question how much BC is concerned about the welfare of their athletes. Think about it...why would UConn want to not let a strong contributor on a bad team play? UConn has long history (and investment) with Brown and they know much more than BC about his condition. UConn also is coming off a bad year and really could use a strong player like Brown on the team. Yet..UConn says no to his return.
I think no matter how you look at this, it doesn't improve the perception that Adazzio is about winning at all costs. And it also appears Adazzio is all about winning right now at all costs (Phillips and now Brown). He is not building for the long term. He is trying to use this job to jettison out of BC as fast as possible. I know that Diaco has the same ambition, but he appears to be doing it the right way and he is not poaching players from other rosters to play one year.
