I never said it wasn't going to work.
I like how you admit that you don't know how they will make money on it - odd that you can have that opinion but be so certain that it's going to turn into a revenue stream for conferences.
I went to an FCS school and continue to watch games online. I am not surprised at how they look - my point was that it is essentially unacceptable for a P5 game to look like that.
Anyone else have AN ENTIRE PAGE of ignored content?
The wackos must be out in full force.
So ESPN and the others won't have to worry about twitter according to you? Don't worry - it's only the entire point of this thread.I'm unclear what your point is. FCS games will never have the same production as FBS p-5 football games. Neither will olympic sports. That won't change and it certainly has nothing to do with twitter.
Yeah this dude is a joke. Next case.This is funny. You are essentially bragging about not being able to handle people with different opinions than yours so you resorted to putting everyone who has a different opinion than you on ignore. Such a badass. LOL.
Excellent contribution BTW.
So to summarize the UConn crowd does not see streaming live sports through places like twitter and hulu is not a sustainable path to income. I on the other hand already see twitter paying 7 figures for NFL games and see twitter buying live sports content right and left so it appears to be an increasing tend with more and more live sports being streamed on twitter which will result in income for the conferences as this evolves.
So ESPN and the others won't have to worry about twitter according to you? Don't worry - it's only the entire point of this thread.
I'm just wondering if they plan on steaming FBS games with the sameness infrastructure? That's all. I understand the utility of it for the FCS and Olympic sports - just wonder if it's viable for the FBS.Again, I am unclear what the level of production has to do with this. I"m not trying to be a jerk but I simply don't see the connection. These FCS, D3, and olympic sports from FBS schools will always be of lower quality production. No reason to waste money on producing a water polo match.
ESPN already streams plenty of FCS level games and they are all of much lower production quality than what you see on ESPN, ESPN2, etc.. Same on LHN with stuff like softball and volleyball games. Same with BTN. Same with PACN. So if twitter streams similar low level content it will likely be of similar production levels coming from the in house production on campuses along with production partners that were already mentioned. Now as they obtain more valuable content from conferences like the PAC and B1G you will see better production for things like basketball games. I believe they will be next as they have content that can already be sold directly to Twitter with no involvement from ESPN or FOX.
If the Big 12 expands or not I expect the AAC to expand West and try to rework their TV deal. That might be the opportunity Twitter is looking for as far as valuable college content that is reasonably priced. For what amounts to very little $ needed to outbid ESPN Twitter could obtain an enormous amount of college content for what amounts to the p-5 TV payout for a couple of schools. Go West and add an audience that is already trained to stream while picking up some nice brands for the conference including BYU. Heck a Twitter/FOX combo might even make more sense as far as bidding for that TV content if we are to believe FOX wants valuable Eastern time zone content.
I'm just wondering if they plan on steaming FBS games with the sameness infrastructure? That's all. I understand the utility of it for the FCS and Olympic sports - just wonder if it's viable for the FBS.
Anyone else have AN ENTIRE PAGE of ignored content?
The wackos must be out in full force.
Whaler isn't' destroying anyone on this board that I have seen. The fact that you think so is hilarious. All he is doing is letting his butthurt show, hardly an internet badass.Three in a row by Whaler destroying someone,
Anyone else have AN ENTIRE PAGE of ignored content?
The wackos must be out in full force.
Disney's nibbling around purchasing Twitter which would instantly result in a thread about Roku streaming AAC games for gobs of money.
Not quite. I have five posts on this page. Three in a row by Whaler destroying someone, then yours, then one by auror. Someone "dim" must have called Whaler a troll and then said something stupid (shockingly) about Twitter. I guess we are staying on subject?
It's the Okie dope under his new handle. It is on topic though - everyone is going to print money from streaming. Except nobody actually knows where the money comes from.