2026 Recruiting: - Transfer Portal | Page 5 | The Boneyard

2026 Recruiting: Transfer Portal

superjohn said:
That's pretty much where I'm at. Despite our record I don't really like the construction of our team. Can't roll out another starting lineup with three set shooters and just one guy Silas who can get in the lane off the bounce. There's so much pressure on Silas and Tarris because as we've seen we have little margin for error especially when those three shooters can't hit anything as we saw against Marquette and in the Big East title game.

Pettiford sharing the backcourt with Silas would be awesome, IMO and Diop at power forward and sharing some of the center minutes. I would also never turn down Vaaks shot creation and talent. There will be a lot of really good/great players in the portal but I hope we are serious about some of these guys.
Expand ...
Vaaks is redundant. He is Solo 2.0. Chucker and no defense. Hard pass on him. He has zero athleticism too. So slow footed. No thanks
 
aburks41 said:
Portal needs for our starting lineup: Power Forward, another CG creator like Castle/Jackson who plays ferocious defense and slashes to the hoop, and another starting caliber center.

Starting lineup should be Silas, CG Portal, Landrew, PF Portal, Reibe or Portal Center (whoever wins the battle).

Bench: Stewart, Ross, Ball (unless he plays defense, he has to move to the bench), backup PG, then whoever loses the starting battle between Reibe/portal center).

Reibe needs to put on 20lbs of muscle if he wants to start next year. I think he'll develop nicely, but we should definitely get another beefy big to compete for that starting spot.

And we need to get back to having 2 PG-like players on the court at all times. Silas can't be alone out there again next season. He needs a robin.
Expand ...
Agree with almost everything on here. I see an almost open competition between Ross/Landrew to start at the 3, though I don’t see total minutes being too far off between the two. Ross either needs to take a big stride in his creation ability or whoever is at the 4 and 2 need to be able to supplement enough that he can be that pure 3 and D guy and not have pressure to create his own shot.
 
.-.
Can easily see the allure for Pettiford to come back home and play in BE/MSG games. PT is gonna be a key for him. Could see UConn/ST J/SH/Nova reaching out to him. Dan and his Dad are tight -think he surprised some folks by going Auburn.

A Demary/Pettiford backcourt combination would be explosive on offense and disruptive on D. Wouldn't have to worry about breaking any presses.
 
I am pretty sure we've seen the last of our non-athletic teams. Word is Hurley knows he needs to make the roster stronger and faster. He's got friends, including a couple of HOF coaches, telling him that. He also made his career having very physical and athletic payers that made up for their lack of skill with speed, power and hustle. The goal now needs to be players that have it all. Hopefully, our NIL coffers are up to the challenge.
 
Hoophound said:
I am pretty sure we've seen the last of our non-athletic teams. Word is Hurley knows he needs to make the roster stronger and faster. He's got friends, including a couple of HOF coaches, telling him that. He also made his career having very physical and athletic payers that made up for their lack of skill with speed, power and hustle. The goal now needs to be players that have it all. Hopefully, our NIL coffers are up to the challenge.
Expand ...
One thing we know about Dan - he can adjust when he sees a need for improvement. One thing we know about this staff - they can get it done.
 
superjohn said:
That's pretty much where I'm at. Despite our record I don't really like the construction of our team. Can't roll out another starting lineup with three set shooters and just one guy Silas who can get in the lane off the bounce. There's so much pressure on Silas and Tarris because as we've seen we have little margin for error especially when those three shooters can't hit anything as we saw against Marquette and in the Big East title game.

Pettiford sharing the backcourt with Silas would be awesome, IMO and Diop at power forward and sharing some of the center minutes. I would also never turn down Vaaks shot creation and talent. There will be a lot of really good/great players in the portal but I hope we are serious about some of these guys.
Expand ...
You could argue not getting Pettiford cost us 2 national championships.

If he’s on the team last year instead of Mahaney there’s a real chance we would have three-peated.

And his play on a team like this would add a new ceiling to what we’ve been all year. You could argue we don’t get Silas if he’s here, but man, that was maybe the most consequential recruiting battle we’ve had in a while, even more than Flagg.
 
.-.
Hoophound said:
I am pretty sure we've seen the last of our non-athletic teams. Word is Hurley knows he needs to make the roster stronger and faster. He's got friends, including a couple of HOF coaches, telling him that. He also made his career having very physical and athletic payers that made up for their lack of skill with speed, power and hustle. The goal now needs to be players that have it all. Hopefully, our NIL coffers are up to the challenge.
Expand ...
Very good points- Perfect example are the PC guys of BY interest-Vaaks and Jones. Both have NBA potential for different reasons. If I had to choose just one of these two guys-and there was mutual interest- I would ride with Jones. Much more athletic with a higher ceiling than Vaaks. IMO-Vaaks is less athletic but has a mature shot-making bag but with a limited commitment to D/boards. Do we need shot-makers next year? Yes- Still taking Jones.
 
Umami Zen said:
Very good points- Perfect example are the PC guys of BY interest-Vaaks and Jones. Both have NBA potential for different reasons. If I had to choose just one of these two guys-and there was mutual interest- I would ride with Jones. Much more athletic with a higher ceiling than Vaaks. IMO-Vaaks is less athletic but has a mature shot-making bag but with a limited commitment to D/boards. Do we need shot-makers next year? Yes- Still taking Jones.
Expand ...
I want both of those guys. Jones is great and everyone sees the potential. I think Vaaks would absolutely ball out in our system.
 
Hoophound said:
I want both of those guys. Jones is great and everyone sees the potential. I think Vaaks would absolutely ball out in our system.
Expand ...
I may be wrong on this-But my gut says Dan would hesitate taking both from a BE program assuming there's even interest on their part. Can see potential in both.. Some prognosticators predicting Kentucky would/will show interest in Vaaks once portal opens up.
 
superjohn said:
Why?
Expand ...
He has mentioned in the press for his disdain for taking BE guys from the portal. Do other BE coaches do it? Yes. Pitino for example. Could it be different this year with the PC guys? Who knows? Just stating my opinion based on his previous comments. BTW-Relating this to taking both vs one or the other. Times are changing in the NBE.
 
.-.
Umami Zen said:
He has mentioned in the press for his disdain for taking BE guys from the portal. Do other BE coaches do it? Yes. Pitino for example. Could it be different this year with the PC guys? Who knows? Just stating my opinion based on his previous comments. BTW-Relating this to taking both vs one or the other. Times are changing in the NBE.
Expand ...
it's different when a guy transfers because a coach gets fired vs doing what Pitino did with Hopkins
 
Umami Zen said:
He has mentioned in the press for his disdain for taking BE guys from the portal. Do other BE coaches do it? Yes. Pitino for example. Could it be different this year with the PC guys? Who knows? Just stating my opinion based on his previous comments. BTW-Relating this to taking both vs one or the other. Times are changing in the NBE.
Expand ...
I think he would really hesitate taking from PC even moreso, given his relationship with RI. Maybe the fact English is gone makes it possible. Not sure. Keeping talent in the conference is a win for the league. If they can lock up a coach quick, maybe that guy can lure them back.
 
I think with the coaching change at Providence, the 'rules' change as far as taking transfers from a school.
 
Last edited:
campcalhoun2009 said:
You could argue not getting Pettiford cost us 2 national championships.

If he’s on the team last year instead of Mahaney there’s a real chance we would have three-peated.

And his play on a team like this would add a new ceiling to what we’ve been all year. You could argue we don’t get Silas if he’s here, but man, that was maybe the most consequential recruiting battle we’ve had in a while, even more than Flagg.
Expand ...
1773849841312.gif
 
RuffRuff said:
I think he would really hesitate taking from PC even moreso, given his relationship with RI. Maybe the fact English is gone makes it possible. Not sure. Keeping talent in the conference is a win for the league. If they can lock up a coach quick, maybe that guy can lure them back.
Expand ...
This makes no sense.
 
Hoophound said:
I am pretty sure we've seen the last of our non-athletic teams. Word is Hurley knows he needs to make the roster stronger and faster. He's got friends, including a couple of HOF coaches, telling him that. He also made his career having very physical and athletic payers that made up for their lack of skill with speed, power and hustle. The goal now needs to be players that have it all. Hopefully, our NIL coffers are up to the challenge.
Expand ...
The motion offense was new and took folks by surprise IMO. that offense needs smart players that can shoot. Defenses have adapted (holding, clutching, etc) so now it's time for the staff to evolve the offense again...maybe by getting more athletic
 
.-.
Drame said:
I think we need 4 players from the portal. Center, PF and 2 pgs. Demery is a CG, ball is a shooting guard and County is a freshman. We need a couple strong ball handlers. We have none on the team right now.
Expand ...
I'd reverse the order somewhat. Center, 2 PF, 1 Point Guard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
167,716
Messages
4,536,160
Members
10,412
Latest member
RusS


Top Bottom