Transfer Portal Starting to Load (do NOT mention ANY current UConn player until Apr 9) | Page 4 | The Boneyard

Transfer Portal Starting to Load (do NOT mention ANY current UConn player until Apr 9)

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
6,241
Reaction Score
19,989
The problem with your premise is that players are not going to stick around long enough to be developed
If a player isn’t in the rotation in his freshman year, he’s not going to stay
The 13 man roster and it’s completely outdated
I suspect going forward the coaches will be looking to have rosters of no more than 10 to 11 players
In today’s environment if you’re playing 8 to 9 players and then there’s two that aren’t going to be happy
That’s not really a problem for bigger programs as long as you show you’re willing to invest in them. And it hasn’t really been a problem for us.

We shot ourselves in the foot this year playing the portal game with Mahaney. I’m not blaming our young guys because we had to double down on a bad decision instead of giving them a shot.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
3,621
Reaction Score
13,389
I doubt anyone would disagree that the best way to do it is get your absolute pick of the best high school players and supplement that by getting your absolute pick of the best mature, tough upperclassmen. The more interesting question is what does every other program besides Duke do?
I know stating some of the obvious with Duke given their natural advantages. Had hoped the portal might neutralize some of their advantages and would level the playing field (because I hate Duke), as they seemed committed to just doing the same old build through Burger Boys routine. Rather than wait out a lot of his home grown guys like Roach & Mitchell, took the proactive and cleaned house to accelerate to the year over model by adding in portal upgrades and better roster fits. What's it's generally saying is that continuity (which is an advantage for many programs that can't recruit at that level), means jack, talent wins. With some of the super old guy COVID advantages dying off (which Pearl is reaping off of), that Duke model looks more and more sustainable. Not many can do what they are doing - although what's interesting is that Samson is bringing in a killer class this year, really a first for him after being more of a developmental guy. I consider him one of the smarter coaches out there.

Pearl is trying to hold onto the old guy recipe bringing in JUCO's at this point, which aren't docked eligibility any longer. Now that is an interesting angle.

I think all we can do is a bit of what Hurley is doing with this Frosh class - get the absolute best class you can, hold onto your 2-3 best returners and go grab really great portal gets. My concern this year is some of those really great portal players are going to be hot commodities, so I'm wondering how we fair.
 

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
6,241
Reaction Score
19,989
Exactly - 611 seems to see this from a program choice standpoint only. Kids will equally have choices and bolt to where they get PT & $$. You're not keeping a freshman for more than a year unless they have a clear sightline to starting year 2. There is really no replacement to develop then real playing time. So unless you're a coach that is willing to play a below grade player allowing and hoping they develop at the sake of fielding a bad team, you're going to lose them.
Where we have a disconnect is the belief that doing this is succumbing to being a worst team and losing.

There’s possibilities that investing in young guys early can do what it used to do, have them playing like sophomores by the end of the season. But if everything is about being risk adverse and what can you do right now we’re never going to get that development of watching a freshman turn into a sophomore.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
3,621
Reaction Score
13,389
That’s not really a problem for bigger programs as long as you show you’re willing to invest in them. And it hasn’t really been a problem for us.

We shot ourselves in the foot this year playing the portal game with Mahaney. I’m not blaming our young guys because we had to double down on a bad decision instead of giving them a shot.
You have to get your portal players right - and there is much less excuse as there is plenty of tape at the required level. Bombing in the portal will be the kiss of death.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
3,621
Reaction Score
13,389
Where we have a disconnect is the belief that doing this is succumbing to being a worst team and losing.
If you are seeing multiple frosh & sophomores big minutes when they aren't ready, you're unlikely to field a NC caliber team.
 

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
6,241
Reaction Score
19,989
If you are seeing multiple frosh & sophomores big minutes when they aren't ready, you're unlikely to field a NC caliber team.
2011 is a prime example of that not being true.

Also, you can’t win a championship every year. This was one of those years.

Eventually you’ll have to have a middling year where the focus is on the process over the prize. I would’ve loved a year where we invested in our freshman, sophomore group to see them gelling by March and ready to be actual contenders next year.

I mean the strategy from this year had us losing 3 games in Maui in a bad start and getting an 8 seed anyways. Was it really worth not focusing on developing guys for the future?
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
3,621
Reaction Score
13,389
2011 is a prime example of that not being true.

Also, you can’t win a championship every year. This was one of those years.

Eventually you’ll have to have a middling year where the focus is on the process over the prize. I would’ve loved a year where we invested in our freshman, sophomore group to see them gelling by March and ready to be actual contenders next year.

I mean the strategy from this year had us losing 3 games in Maui in a bad start and getting an 8 seed anyways. Was it really worth not focusing on developing guys for the future?
Please don't reference old Uconn teams from another era - they just aren't relevant. There was no portal back then. Need to look forward, not backwards.

As for the last question, well that's a hard one. You can kick the can on the frosh or you can hope that the guys you counted on to be an NC team figure it out. I think most coaches these days at top programs opt for the latter.
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
51,574
Reaction Score
185,834
2011 is a prime example of that not being true.

Also, you can’t win a championship every year. This was one of those years.

Eventually you’ll have to have a middling year where the focus is on the process over the prize. I would’ve loved a year where we invested in our freshman, sophomore group to see them gelling by March and ready to be actual contenders next year.

I mean the strategy from this year had us losing 3 games in Maui in a bad start and getting an 8 seed anyways. Was it really worth not focusing on developing guys for the future?
Our freshmen and sophomores aren't good enough outside of Solo. This season would've been a disaster if Nowell, Solo, Ross, Stewart, Abraham were getting the big minutes.

This season isn't over, it's annoying posters are pretending it is. It's also annoying how posters are pretending you need a team full of 5 stars and the top portal players to be successful.

There's so much nonsense posted in this thread.
 
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
14,544
Reaction Score
98,032
2011 is a prime example of that not being true.

Also, you can’t win a championship every year. This was one of those years.

Eventually you’ll have to have a middling year where the focus is on the process over the prize. I would’ve loved a year where we invested in our freshman, sophomore group to see them gelling by March and ready to be actual contenders next year.

I mean the strategy from this year had us losing 3 games in Maui in a bad start and getting an 8 seed anyways. Was it really worth not focusing on developing guys for the future?
The young guys who are important to next year's success were developed this season just as they should have been
 
Joined
Sep 16, 2011
Messages
51,574
Reaction Score
185,834
Why does Georgia Tech suck so much? We have guys hoping we can get two of their studs through the transfer portal and Asa Newell is a lottery pick.
 

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
6,241
Reaction Score
19,989
Please don't reference old Uconn teams from another era - they just aren't relevant. There was no portal back then. Need to look forward, not backwards.

As for the last question, well that's a hard one. You can kick the can on the frosh or you can hope that the guys you counted on to be an NC team figure it out. I think most coaches these days at top programs opt for the latter.
That’s exactly why the coach who figures out caring about player development (and can actually recruit) more than winning will win easily.

This mindset is very shortsighted without a guarantee of a win.
Our freshmen and sophomores aren't good enough outside of Solo. This season would've been a disaster if Nowell, Solo, Ross, Stewart, Abraham were getting the big minutes.

This season isn't over, it's annoying posters are pretending it is. It's also annoying how posters are pretending you need a team full of 5 stars and the top portal players to be successful.

There's so much nonsense posted in this thread.
I don’t care about having a 2007 season when I know a 2009 season is guaranteed. (Even though I’m not suggesting exactly what you’re saying).

What I don’t want is constant 2022 seasons.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2011
Messages
2,365
Reaction Score
6,567
Are we going to track most of the 2000 or so players who will enter the portal in this thread or only ones UConn shows interest in or ones we think UConn should show interest in? Because if you want us to post all the players who enter the portal then this is going to be one long thread.

Just show me the stud PGs
 

HuskyWarrior611

Mid range white knight
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
6,241
Reaction Score
19,989
Don't see why they wouldn't look at the possibility of Solo being PG-ish. When Cam and Tristan were playing together, I guess Newt was your PG, but I don't think there is exclusivity to the role when you have multiple guys who can handle the ball, and have vision. The system is based on passing, not dribbling.
I’m just of the belief the things Solo needs to get better at are very teachable. There was a whole segment for the Marquette game on how hard he works.

If we ask him to work on a skill with his work ethic, there’s little doubt in my mind he will get better.

We asked him to be a shooter and after one summer he’s one of the best in the country.
 

StllH8L8ner

You’ll get nothing and like it!
Joined
Mar 22, 2020
Messages
2,377
Reaction Score
13,096
Just show me the stud PGs

Proud Of You Yes GIF


Spend every nickel on a high IQ guy who can get open when pressed and doesn’t panic under pressure. Does Doron have any college age kids?
 

Online statistics

Members online
390
Guests online
2,094
Total visitors
2,484

Forum statistics

Threads
162,022
Messages
4,288,366
Members
10,122
Latest member
angelo


.
..
Top Bottom