the title is "the top perimeter teams" not backcourts. It's a classic ambiguous ESPN article to stir up the pot. It also makes it easy for the author to write because he doesn't have to do deep research. He basically removed all one dimensional low post players with no perimeter skills from each roster and then ranked the teams. Since skill position players have about 90% of the influence in college games, than he was able to just pick 10 of the top 15 teams for next season and list their "perimeter" players. These articles really annoy me. An intern could have written this in about 45 minutes.