- Joined
- Aug 25, 2011
- Messages
- 16,722
- Reaction Score
- 33,201
It just so happened that Kane, Appling, Wilbekin, and the Harrison twins all picked the wrong team to play an awful game. Bad luck.
Fixed
It just so happened that Kane, Appling, Wilbekin, and the Harrison twins all picked the wrong team to play an awful game. Bad luck.
This ranking of coaches is flawed, but today I was in the car listening to Cowherd and he normally is semi rational. He's making a point today that it's not talent that wins but it's coaches with great systems. His example for college basketball was that Duke doesn't always have the best talent but with a great coach and system they always win. Do they not get 5 star and McD's every year or am I hallucinating?
His example of doing more with less and great coaching should have been us, we have been the poster program for exactly that even though yes we have had big recruits in the past, but look at last year's roster for example. The media including broadcasters and of course ESPN perpetuate this kind of crap continuously.
That didn't have bad games. They were all sick. Each caught a quick and nearly fatal case of Huskyinurazzitis. There was no treatment and certainly no cure.It just so happened that Kane, Appling, Wilbekin, and the Harrison twins all picked the wrong time to play an awful game. Bad luck.
Cowherd seems to be viewed as pretty good here…..I think he's less than educated on most sports but knows enough to talk about it intellectually I guess……in this case he didn't do his homework using Coach K and Duke……..McD's AA's that never get better? yeah ok
In fairness, is there anyone that can comment intelligently on all sports? Pretty hard to do. Challenging enough for analysts who focus on only one sport.
Well most of it is about how he apparently did so much with so little, just read the portion of the article talking about him losing to UConn (for the SECOND TIME, as the author oh so conveniently forgot to mention) and it's a full paragraph of excuses. The K article was pretty much the same.It is kind of weird that Donovan is given this ranking in the same year where he has clearly the best team in the country and doesn't win the title.
Have there ever been teams with as much talent as Calipari has had over the past three or four years??? Maybe with John Wooden, in the late 60's and 70's but other than that, NO! I realize that Calipari did a nice job to integrate these freshmen into a viable team but can you coach natural ability and talent? He had all-star teams on his roster over these seasons. His recruiting ability far exceeded his coaching ability though I do feel he's a good coach. Even then, with all the talent he had, the team needed months to become an outstanding team this past year. Earlier in the season, they were embarrassing themselves at times. That's why their seeding was so ridiculously poor. For a time, there was a question as to whether they were going to get in though the committee will often defer to the "elite" programs and bend rules to insure the legendary programs are seldom out of the dance.If it's recent history...how can Calipari not be number 1? NCAA title, Final Game, and Final four in 3 seasons. That's the best.
The absurdity of that is ludicrous. How many times has Duke not had a top ten recruiting class in the last 25 years. More often than not, they've had a Top 3 recruiting class or better. The only team that ever had more McDonald players on their roster than Duke was North Carolina, at least until Calipari got into Lexington. Duke has often had more McDonald players on their active roster than UConn has had in their HISTORY! Stupid remarks that people who get paid for a living to be all knowing in sports get away with. Sometimes I think these guys are worse than weathermen who can continually be wrong, day after day and still make the big bucks on major market stations.This ranking of coaches is flawed, but today I was in the car listening to Cowherd and he normally is semi rational. He's making a point today that it's not talent that wins but it's coaches with great systems. His example for college basketball was that Duke doesn't always have the best talent but with a great coach and system they always win. Do they not get 5 star and McD's every year or am I hallucinating?
His example of doing more with less and great coaching should have been us, we have been the poster program for exactly that even though yes we have had big recruits in the past, but look at last year's roster for example. The media including broadcasters and of course ESPN perpetuate this kind of crap continuously.
I don't think there's any question that Pitino and Donovan are better coaches than Calipari because they often get players that are not top ten type players upon arriving and inevitably these players blossom and exceed expectations. Quite similarly to what Calhoun and now Ollie are doing. Calipari has been blessed with great players due to his great "snake oil" recruiting style and has been very successful. I don't think he's nearly at the same level as the two afore mentioned coaches are.I'm pleasantly surprised Coach K was "only" #4.
I think that you can't help paying attention to careers and not just the present. I would pick Ollie as my coach over all of them but if they put Ollie too low after only one tournament, it would have beem weird.
I think Donovan & Cal deserve the top spots.
And then they beat undefeated Wichita State, Louisville, Michigan and Wisconsin before losing to UConn.Even then, with all the talent he had, the team needed months to become an outstanding team this past year. Earlier in the season, they were embarrassing themselves at times. That's why their seeding was so ridiculously poor. For a time, there was a question as to whether they were going to get in though the committee will often defer to the "elite" programs and bend rules to insure the legendary programs are seldom out of the dance.
It is kind of weird that Donovan is given this ranking in the same year where he has clearly the best team in the country and doesn't win the title.
I don't think there's any question that Pitino and Donovan are better coaches than Calipari because they often get players that are not top ten type players upon arriving and inevitably these players blossom and exceed expectations. Quite similarly to what Calhoun and now Ollie are doing. Calipari has been blessed with great players due to his great "snake oil" recruiting style and has been very successful. I don't think he's nearly at the same level as the two afore mentioned coaches are.
Have there ever been teams with as much talent as Calipari has had over the past three or four years??? Maybe with John Wooden, in the late 60's and 70's but other than that, NO! I realize that Calipari did a nice job to integrate these freshmen into a viable team but can you coach natural ability and talent? He had all-star teams on his roster over these seasons. His recruiting ability far exceeded his coaching ability though I do feel he's a good coach. Even then, with all the talent he had, the team needed months to become an outstanding team this past year. Earlier in the season, they were embarrassing themselves at times. That's why their seeding was so ridiculously poor. For a time, there was a question as to whether they were going to get in though the committee will often defer to the "elite" programs and bend rules to insure the legendary programs are seldom out of the dance.
It is kind of weird that Donovan is given this ranking in the same year where he has clearly the best team in the country and doesn't win the title.
Has squid slime totally erased everyone's memory of Pitino slime?
But Pitino's is more sticky...Different type. Pitino's is absolutely hilarious. Squid 's is just icky.