I'll go along with your "at least 90 minutes" for the 3 players you mention, which seems to exclude 6 of our Nasty Nine from your "best players" category.
So that means 110 minutes or less for the following group: ONO, DJ, AE, EW, CW, and NM, who you seem to consider as a step down from your named best players. 80 of the 110 minutes must go to cover the 4 & 5 positions. Let's give CD 10 of her 30+ minutes as a 4 , so that means 70 of the 80 positions 4 & 5 (or 23 minutes each) will be covered by ONO, DJ and AE Now we have 40 minutes left (200-90-70) to spread among 1) our motor and Conf DPOY, NM; 2) our 1st team All-Conference and recently top scorer, CW ; and 3) the team spark plug off the bench, EW, so they get 13 minutes each. And clearly none of this last group can be considered (by you at least) as anywhere close to our best group of players, although many BY posters would disagree.
I think it best to allow our HOF HC to decide who and when certain players need to be in the game.
Why can't we just accept that we are very lucky to have this group of 9 very talented young women with a wide variety of complementary skills? They all seem to have one priority-WINNING, no matter how many minutes they play in any particular game. They might just be good enough to win NC # 12 !