Time to get rich y’all Illinois (-20) @ UConn | Page 3 | The Boneyard

Time to get rich y’all Illinois (-20) @ UConn

.-.
whaler11 said:
nope. and im smart enough to know when im not. thats the difference between us
Expand ...
When you know you are not, perhaps you should alter your behavior a little. And how would you know the difference between us?
 
LIUCHusky said:
When you know you are not, perhaps you should alter your behavior a little. And how would you know the difference between us?
Expand ...

that you think this angle is a winner makes the difference between us clear.
 
whaler11 said:
that you think this angle is a winner makes the difference between us clear.
Expand ...
Please explain this clear difference to this guy who knows he is not always the smartest guy in the room.
 
LIUCHusky said:
Please explain this clear difference to this guy who knows he is not always the smartest guy in the room.
Expand ...

since you asked... i’m still young enough to actually know when i’m not the smartest person in the room. i dont need to use faux modesty to try and make a point.
 
ShakyTheMohel said:
They looked good against the run. There are still significant issues against the pass. Better than last year, but still a big issue.
Expand ...


One side more than the other and I agree it needs work
 
.-.
uconnbill said:
Suck it up buttercup you took a crappier today with you pick of a blowout, so own it
Expand ...

have to love you totally missing the point. never change
 
whaler11 said:
have to love you totally missing the point. never change
Expand ...

Nah I didn't miss the point at all, just jabbing you as I knew you would respond and you didn't disappoint me :cool:
 
whaler11 said:
since you asked... i’m still young enough to actually know when i’m not the smartest person in the room. i dont need to use faux modesty to try and make a point.
Expand ...
Still haven't explained the difference between us.
 
LIUCHusky said:
Still haven't explained the difference between us.
Expand ...

when i have the opportunity to dunk on someone here i am successful. hope that cleared it up
 
LIUCHusky said:
Sincerely doubt could dunk on my 10 year old grandson. Good night.
Expand ...

pro tip: get good enough at the internet to stop double quoting posts if you wanna pretend to be the smartest guy in room.
 
.-.
Very rarely do I like or agree with Whaler's constant negativity but I need to apologize for my post about degenerate gamblers typically lashing out when they lose and suggest we leave his pre game "get paid" post out of any future arguments. Not my business but I'm assuming he lost a few jingles today. That being said, despite his negativity and personal loss, he's still trying to argue why we should have won this game. That means something to me and immediately takes "degenerate" off the table.

My bad, Whaler. I apologize for throwing that label on you.
 
Last edited:
whaler11 said:
pro tip: get good enough at the internet to stop double quoting posts if you wanna pretend to be the smartest guy in room.
Expand ...
So thankful I have never met anyone in real life so full of himself as you are on the internet.
 
Dream Jobbed 2.0 said:
Who are going to play that’s better? Is Richard Lagow still at Indiana? Did they see Milton’s leg back on?
Expand ...

Penix is a ridiculously talented rs frosh who turned down tenn and fla st to go to Indiana. Great athlete. I’m a big fan of his. Plus Houston has a good QB.
 
.-.
formerlurker said:
Very rarely do I like or agree with Whaler's constant negativity but I need to apologize for my post about degenerate gamblers typically lashing out when they lose and suggest we leave his pre game "get paid" post out of any future arguments. Not my business but I'm assuming he lost a few jingles today. That being said, despite his negativity and personal loss, he's still trying to argue why we should have won this game. That means something to me and immediately takes "degenerate" off the table.

My bad, Whaler. I apologize for throwing that label on you.
Expand ...

i was 3-2 and won $80. i think im gonna be ok.

the subject was sarcastic - it was a reference to being able to take the 20 and get rich. im a firm believer that the market is very efficient - there is no such thing as a lock or nonsense like that.

i dont think the should have won the game. had they been more aggressive at 7-0 and 10-0 they could have won the game.

some weeks i bet on them others i dont - it just makes the game more interesting - anyone who knows me can tell you im not sweating the $ on any bet.
 
formerlurker said:
That being said, despite his negativity and personal loss, he's still trying to argue why we should have won this game. That means something to me and immediately takes "degenerate" off the table.
Expand ...

I would disagree.

I am certain he is a degenerate on some level.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
168,260
Messages
4,560,335
Members
10,448
Latest member
MillerLitEd


Top Bottom