That sentence says it all.Unlike past years, Tiff did not get down on herself, and she kept working. She got rebounds and assists and played defense. If she has made a couple of layups and one more trey, we would be raving about her game.
Go back and look at the video of the first half. There is nothing wrong with her shot selection. She threw up one wild shot after she got a rebound too far under the basket to do anything with it and, being surrounded by trees, just threw it up, for lack of anything else to do with it. On another drive, she seemed to slip. Other than that, she drew three fouls, got clobbered on at least on other drive but did not get the call. Her three-point attempts were within the flow of the game. This "wild shots" business is inacurate.
I've been totally amazed at how out of control Tiffany Hayes has been. Isn't she a senior??? I've never seen anyone whose put up such outrageous shots from every conceivable angle and place on the floor. Thankfully we have an outstanding freshman that's keeping us in this game.
For all of us who hoped that another year of maturation would prove beneficial to Tiff's game, this was a pretty big disappointment, much as it pains me to say it. Aggressive? Yes. But in trying to do too much, she played just as wildly out of control as she did in the big games the previous few years. Come tourney time, this is going to hurt our chances....it's getting late in the day to expect a more mature approach to combine with her undeniable ahleticism. Great kid....but the same player we saw last year.
Hey now...no one seems to be mentioning Tiffany's number one area of improvement over last year. It appears she has relinquished her position as the human floor polisher.![]()
I can't help but wonder what kind of reactions I would see if certain unnamed players had put together the numbers that TH did?
Perhaps the old saying is really true.
Strongly held beliefs and emotions can influnce our perceptions of reality.
Okay, I made that up. But I hope you get my point.
Peace,
John Fryer
Point well taken. A very apt quote.
Hey now...no one seems to be mentioning Tiffany's number one area of improvement over last year. It appears she has relinquished her position as the human floor polisher.![]()
I can't help but wonder what kind of reactions I would see if certain unnamed players had put together the numbers that TH did?
Perhaps the old saying is really true.
Strongly held beliefs and emotions can influnce our perceptions of reality.
Okay, I made that up. But I hope you get my point.
Peace,
John Fryer
13 boards and 8 assists obviously don't please you guys. I guess if she DID have some refinement and basketball IQ, she would have made more of her open threes. Sheesh!
She did a lot of good things, but she didn't play close to the level that she can. I'm not sure why you are trying to excuse that. UConn won't beat Baylor the way Hayes played against Stanford.
To me the fact that she can do so much besides jack up shots (the rebounds, assists, and defense) doesn't make her awful decisions with ball better - it makes it worse. She is not a good three point shooter. She should not be shooting 8 threes in a game. She should take the ball to the hoop, and do so under control. She should take 1 or 2 threes a game; only when she is open, set, and right on the line - not 3 feet behind it.
She is a female Dyson, which is both a good and bad thing - terrific athlete, lots of heart, but not a smart player.
She did a lot of good things, but she didn't play close to the level that she can. I'm not sure why you are trying to excuse that. UConn won't beat Baylor the way Hayes played against Stanford.
To me the fact that she can do so much besides jack up shots (the rebounds, assists, and defense) doesn't make her awful decisions with ball better - it makes it worse. She is not a good three point shooter. She should not be shooting 8 threes in a game. She should take the ball to the hoop, and do so under control. She should take 1 or 2 threes a game; only when she is open, set, and right on the line - not 3 feet behind it.
She is a female Dyson, which is both a good and bad thing - terrific athlete, lots of heart, but not a smart player.
She did a lot of good things, but she didn't play close to the level that she can. I'm not sure why you are trying to excuse that. UConn won't beat Baylor the way Hayes played against Stanford.
To me the fact that she can do so much besides jack up shots (the rebounds, assists, and defense) doesn't make her awful decisions with ball better - it makes it worse. She is not a good three point shooter. She should not be shooting 8 threes in a game. She should take the ball to the hoop, and do so under control. She should take 1 or 2 threes a game; only when she is open, set, and right on the line - not 3 feet behind it.
She is a female Dyson, which is both a good and bad thing - terrific athlete, lots of heart, but not a smart player.