I repeated myself because your response didn't make any sense. Either your reading comprehension isn't very good, or you're moving the goalposts on purpose.
1) You say that by my logic the TO at 4-0 was a good idea, simply because I said KO is bad at calling timeouts before we're down 20 points? Great spin there.
2) My point was that KO has been bad at calling TO's his entire career here. There are plenty of people here who have complained about this. I'm not the only one. Yes, I did have complaints about this in 2014 as did many others. So by your logic since we won a national championship that means it didn't happen throughout that year? Or that it's ok to suck at calling timeouts because we had a great three week run 3 years ago? Again great logic, and you didn't even address my actual point.
I'm not one of the people who comes on here and complains a lot, I'm a pretty positive fan. I'm not calling for KO's head. He has some weaknesses as a coach and calling timeouts is one of them and has been his entire tenure. Your lone arguements to refute that point were "we had a great 3 week run 3 years ago so that somehow means you're wrong" and "KO called a timeout at 4-0 which is exactly what you want." which is obviously a gross reinterpretation of my point which was that he shouldn't wait until we're down 20 points to call a TO.
If you have an arguement that actually refutes my point I'm all ears.