- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 2,526
- Reaction Score
- 9,737
So are youYou're clueless.
So are youYou're clueless.
So, explain this to me. We have great athletes who could play fast? Cuz, let's be clear, I'm not saying our offense is great but we can't shoot and can't finish.You're clueless.
Because our guards have no handle to break the press. Give me Walker, Napier, Boat, and I’ll show you guards who could break the press and punish you for overplaying them.Why does UConn never ATTACK the press???
Unfortunately we have lots of evidence of that. Although I find people to be far more insufferable this year than when we were in the AAC. Exhibit A, rcarj right below youMan, if this is the Boneyard after a loss in the Big East, I can’t imagine what it’d look like after a loss in the AAC.
Alabama is very good. Indiana not so much. Oh well.They lost to SH by 17
They split w Marquette
They split w Creighton
They lost to St John's by 11
They lost to three other opponents we haven't played (Gtown, Nova, Xavier)
OOC they got smoked by Indiana and Alabama. Their best OOC win is TCU.
Wow, that sounds like a powerhouse to me......
Our players are more talented and more athletic than PC's players and we're deeper. Hurley was badly outcoached today.So, explain this to me. We have great athletes who could play fast? Cuz, let's be clear, I'm not saying our offense is great but we can't shoot and can't finish.
Or do you think our upperclassmen are good players? Because all but Martin and Cole are actively not particularly good.
The most athletic and talented players on this team are either injured, freshmen, or, in the case of Gaffney, still figuring himself out.
Hurley, and UConn, will be fine. When the other team has the two best players on the court, you're not going to win much despite coaching.
I feel very confident saying this is not the caseHurleys seat is gonna be getting very hot soon if he goes 0/3 on making the tournament. This is UConn, not some bush league A10 team.
Which of our players is better than David Duke? Which of them are better than Watson?Our players are more talented and more athletic than PC's players and we're deeper. Hurley was badly outcoached today.
That’s just not accurate at all. But I’m not gonna argue w you anymore. We have way more talent than PC that was on the floor TODAY.Alabama is very good. Indiana not so much. Oh well.
Are we going to beat those three teams without Bouknight? How much were we down to Seton Hall.
They basically look like a team that—if we had Bouk—we'd beat in a tough game, but beat 7 or 8 times out of 10. Without him, we're going to lose to them 8 out of every 10 times.
They had—objectively—the two best players on the floor. They've played more games. They've had more practices. They're best players are upperclassmen with Big East experience while our upperclassmen are A10 level talents and our best players are injured, were recently injured, and all are underclassmen. Give us a healthy Bouk and we still win.That’s just not accurate at all. But I’m not gonna argue w you anymore. We have way more talent than PC that was on the floor TODAY.
Hurleys seat is gonna be getting very hot soon if he goes 0/3 on making the tournament. This is UConn, not some bush league A10 team.
UConn broke the press and then sat and waited for the defense to set up. I don’t think even once did they try and attack the basket once they broke the press. I consider that a tactical error/coaching error. It’s not necessarily fast but it’s an attacking approach. I think our offense is much too passive for a team without offensive firepower.So, explain this to me. We have great athletes who could play fast? Cuz, let's be clear, I'm not saying our offense is great but we can't shoot and can't finish.
Or do you think our upperclassmen are good players? Because all but Martin and Cole are actively not particularly good.
The most athletic and talented players on this team are either injured, freshmen, or, in the case of Gaffney, still figuring himself out.
Hurley, and UConn, will be fine. When the other team has the two best players on the court, you're not going to win much despite coaching.
I don’t think you understand the meaning of the word objectivelyThey had—objectively—the two best players on the floor. They've played more games. They've had more practices. They're best players are upperclassmen with Big East experience while our upperclassmen are A10 level talents and our best players are injured, were recently injured, and all are underclassmen. Give us a healthy Bouk and we still win.
In two years we're rolling out teams that house a team that looks like this PC team. I just don't understand why people can't objectively look at the what we've got.
Because when we get thumped by a terrible team we're supposed to adjust our expectations downwards and our excuses upwards. Coach Cooley had his guys ready and Coach Hurley didn't. Along with our anemic shooting that hasn't been resolved that's the entire story. Not prepared and can't shoot. If I'm the Coach I'm making adjustments in preparation and gameplan. Shuffling the lineup has already been exhausted when everybody is just repeating the same plan and coming up empty. And I'm tired of the sideshow where my Coach seems more focused on extraneous calls than our lack of execution. We adjust too little, too late. Without a coach on the floor, a go to guy we look lost.The idea you're okay with us scoring 59 points and think we aren't capable of beating Providence is a joke. They just gave up 92 points to St. John's their last game. They just ran a really weak press against us since the opening tip and Hurley never got them to adjust to it and attack it. Polley and Carlton are weak no doubt, Whaley is a good player. The rest of the team is all Hurley's recruits, if he can't be expected to win against Big East teams just because his star player is out we have major problems.
The BIg East is a very good conference but this is a weak year for the conference and Providence isn't good.
Honestly, which non-Bouknight player on our team is consistently better than Duke or Watson?I don’t think you understand the meaning of the word objectively